scholarly journals Privileging the Machines: American Engineers, Indentured Chinese and White Workers in South Africa's Deep-Level Gold Mines, 1902–1907

2007 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Higginson

Economists and historians have identified the period between 1870 and 1914 as one marked by the movement of capital and labor across the globe at unprecedented speed. The accompanying spread of the gold standard and industrial techniques contained volatile and ambiguous implications for workers everywhere. Industrial engineers made new machinery and industrial techniques the measure of human effort. The plight of workers in South Africa's deep-level gold mines in the era following the Anglo-Boer War of 1899–1902 provides a powerful example of just how lethal the new benchmarks of human effort could be. When by 1904 close to 50,000 Africans refused to return to the mines, mining policy began to coalesce around solving the “labor shortage” problem and dramatically reducing working costs. Engineers, especially American engineers, rapidly gained the confidence of the companies that had made large investments in the deep-level mines of the Far East Rand by bringing more than 60,000 indentured Chinese workers to the mines to make up for the postwar shortfall in unskilled labor in late 1904. But the dangerous working conditions that drove African workers away from many of the deep-level mines persisted. Three years later, in 1907, their persistence provoked a bitter strike by white drill-men.

Author(s):  
Sergey Belozercev ◽  
◽  

In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Chinese subjects worked in the mountain gold mines of Siberia and the Far East. According to historical evidence, part of the gold mined by Chinese workers was stolen, smelted, and smuggled to China. The smuggling of gold across the Russian-Chinese border provoked the growth of serious and especially serious crimes. Chinese miners were hunted by Chinese and Russian bandits who robbed and killed workers.


2020 ◽  
pp. 108-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. A. Bryzgalin ◽  
Е. N. Nikishina

The paper investigates cross-cultural differences across Russian regions using the methodology of G. Hofstede. First, it discusses the most common approaches in measuring culture and the application of the Hofstede methodology in subnational studies. It identifies the critical issues in measuring culture at the regional level and suggests several strategies to address them. Secondly, the paper introduces subregional data on individualism and uncertainty avoidance using a survey of students across 27 Russian universities. The data allow to establish geographical patterns of individualism in Russia. It is demonstrated that collectivism is most prevalent in the Volga region, while individualism characteristic becomes stronger towards the Far East. The findings are robust to the inclusion of various controls and different specifications of the regression model. Finally, the paper provides a discussion about the potential of applying the sociocultural approach in economics.


1937 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 45-47
Author(s):  
R. G. S.
Keyword(s):  
Far East ◽  

1938 ◽  
Vol 7 (18) ◽  
pp. 205-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter A. Radius
Keyword(s):  
Far East ◽  

1936 ◽  
Vol 5 (18) ◽  
pp. 189-193
Author(s):  
Frederick V. Field
Keyword(s):  
Far East ◽  

1944 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 59-62
Author(s):  
Raymond Dennett
Keyword(s):  
Far East ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document