Statistical structure of turbulent-boundary-layer velocity–vorticity products at high and low Reynolds numbers

2007 ◽  
Vol 570 ◽  
pp. 307-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. A. PRIYADARSHANA ◽  
J. C. KLEWICKI ◽  
S. TREAT ◽  
J. F. FOSS
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Reynolds Shear Stress ◽  
Rough Wall ◽  
Reynolds Stresses ◽  
Wall Boundary Layer ◽  
Layer Flow

The mean wall-normal gradients of the Reynolds shear stress and the turbulent kinetic energy have direct connections to the transport mechanisms of turbulent-boundary-layer flow. According to the Stokes–Helmholtz decomposition, these gradients can be expressed in terms of velocity–vorticity products. Physical experiments were conducted to explore the statistical properties of some of the relevant velocity–vorticity products. The high-Reynolds-number data (Rθ≃O(106), where θ is the momentum thickness) were acquired in the near neutrally stable atmospheric-surface-layer flow over a salt playa under both smooth- and rough-wall conditions. The low-Rθdata were from a database acquired in a large-scale laboratory facility at 1000 >Rθ> 5000. Corresponding to a companion study of the Reynolds stresses (Priyadarshana & Klewicki,Phys. Fluids, vol. 16, 2004, p. 4586), comparisons of low- and high-Rθas well as smooth- and rough-wall boundary-layer results were made at the approximate wall-normal locationsyp/2 and 2yp, whereypis the wall-normal location of the peak of the Reynolds shear stress, at each Reynolds number. In this paper, the properties of thevωz,wωyanduωzproducts are analysed through their statistics and cospectra over a three-decade variation in Reynolds number. Hereu,vandware the fluctuating streamwise, wall-normal and spanwise velocity components and ωyand ωzare the fluctuating wall-normal and spanwise vorticity components. It is observed thatv–ωzstatistics and spectral behaviours exhibit considerable sensitivity to Reynolds number as well as to wall roughness. More broadly, the correlations between thevand ω fields are seen to arise from a ‘scale selection’ near the peak in the associated vorticity spectra and, in some cases, near the peak in the associated velocity spectra as well.

scholarly journals Assessment of inner–outer interactions in the urban boundary layer using a predictive model

2019 ◽  
Vol 875 ◽  
pp. 44-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Blackman ◽  
Laurent Perret ◽  
Romain Mathis
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Predictive Model ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Limited Range ◽  
Rough Wall ◽  
Wall Boundary ◽  
Layer Flow

Urban-type rough-wall boundary layers developing over staggered cube arrays with plan area packing density, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{p}$, of 6.25 %, 25 % or 44.4 % have been studied at two Reynolds numbers within a wind tunnel using hot-wire anemometry (HWA). A fixed HWA probe is used to capture the outer-layer flow while a second moving probe is used to capture the inner-layer flow at 13 wall-normal positions between $1.25h$ and $4h$ where $h$ is the height of the roughness elements. The synchronized two-point HWA measurements are used to extract the near-canopy large-scale signal using spectral linear stochastic estimation and a predictive model is calibrated in each of the six measurement configurations. Analysis of the predictive model coefficients demonstrates that the canopy geometry has a significant influence on both the superposition and amplitude modulation. The universal signal, the signal that exists in the absence of any large-scale influence, is also modified as a result of local canopy geometry suggesting that although the nonlinear interactions within urban-type rough-wall boundary layers can be modelled using the predictive model as proposed by Mathis et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 681, 2011, pp. 537–566), the model must be however calibrated for each type of canopy flow regime. The Reynolds number does not significantly affect any of the model coefficients, at least over the limited range of Reynolds numbers studied here. Finally, the predictive model is validated using a prediction of the near-canopy signal at a higher Reynolds number and a prediction using reference signals measured in different canopy geometries to run the model. Statistics up to the fourth order and spectra are accurately reproduced demonstrating the capability of the predictive model in an urban-type rough-wall boundary layer.

Very-large-scale motions in a turbulent boundary layer

2011 ◽  
Vol 673 ◽  
pp. 80-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAE HWA LEE ◽  
HYUNG JIN SUNG
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Spatial Organization ◽  
Reynolds Shear Stress ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Hairpin Vortices ◽  
Extraction Algorithm ◽  
Normal Distance

Direct numerical simulation of a turbulent boundary layer was performed to investigate the spatially coherent structures associated with very-large-scale motions (VLSMs). The Reynolds number was varied in the range Reθ = 570–2560. The main simulation was conducted by using a computational box greater than 50δo in the streamwise domain, where δo is the boundary layer thickness at the inlet, and inflow data was obtained from a separate inflow simulation based on Lund's method. Inspection of the three-dimensional instantaneous fields showed that groups of hairpin vortices are coherently arranged in the streamwise direction and that these groups create significantly elongated low- and high-momentum regions with large amounts of Reynolds shear stress. Adjacent packet-type structures combine to form the VLSMs; this formation process is attributed to continuous stretching of the hairpins coupled with lifting-up and backward curling of the vortices. The growth of the spanwise scale of the hairpin packets occurs continuously, so it increases rapidly to double that of the original width of the packets. We employed the modified feature extraction algorithm developed by Ganapathisubramani, Longmire & Marusic (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 478, 2003, p. 35) to identify the properties of the VLSMs of hairpin vortices. In the log layer, patches with the length greater than 3δ–4δ account for more than 40% of all the patches and these VLSMs contribute approximately 45% of the total Reynolds shear stress included in all the patches. The VLSMs have a statistical streamwise coherence of the order of ~6δ; the spatial organization and coherence decrease away from the wall, but the spanwise width increases monotonically with the wall-normal distance. Finally, the application of linear stochastic estimation demonstrated the presence of packet organization in the form of a train of packets in the log layer.

The effects of a favourable pressure gradient and of the Reynolds number on an incompressible axisymmetric turbulent boundary layer. Part 1. The turbulent boundary layer

1998 ◽  
Vol 359 ◽  
pp. 329-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. H. FERNHOLZ ◽  
D. WARNACK
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Wall Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Skin Friction ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Reynolds Stresses ◽  
The Mean

The effects of a favourable pressure gradient (K[les ]4×10−6) and of the Reynolds number (862[les ]Reδ2[les ]5800) on the mean and fluctuating quantities of four turbulent boundary layers were studied experimentally and are presented in this paper and a companion paper (Part 2). The measurements consist of extensive hot-wire and skin-friction data. The former comprise mean and fluctuating velocities, their correlations and spectra, the latter wall-shear stress measurements obtained by four different techniques which allow testing of calibrations in both laminar-like and turbulent flows for the first time. The measurements provide complete data sets, obtained in an axisymmetric test section, which can serve as test cases as specified by the 1981 Stanford conference.Two different types of accelerated boundary layers were investigated and are described: in this paper (Part 1) the fully turbulent, accelerated boundary layer (sometimes denoted laminarescent) with approximately local equilibrium between the production and dissipation of the turbulent energy and with relaxation to a zero pressure gradient flow (cases 1 and 3); and in Part 2 the strongly accelerated boundary layer with ‘inactive’ turbulence, laminar-like mean flow behaviour (relaminarized), and reversion to the turbulent state (cases 2 and 4). In all four cases the standard logarithmic law fails but there is no single parametric criterion which denotes the beginning or the end of this breakdown. However, it can be demonstrated that the departure of the mean-velocity profile is accompanied by characteristic changes of turbulent quantities, such as the maxima of the Reynolds stresses or the fluctuating value of the skin friction.The boundary layers described here are maintained in the laminarescent state just up to the beginning of relaminarization and then relaxed to the turbulent state in a zero pressure gradient. The relaxation of the turbulence structure occurs much faster than in an adverse pressure gradient. In the accelerating boundary layer absolute values of the Reynolds stresses remain more or less constant in the outer region of the boundary layer in accordance with the results of Blackwelder & Kovasznay (1972), and rise both in the vincinity of the wall in conjunction with the rising wall shear stress and in the centre region of the boundary layer with the increase of production.

Turbulent boundary layers at moderate Reynolds numbers: inflow length and tripping effects

2012 ◽  
Vol 710 ◽  
pp. 5-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Schlatter ◽  
Ramis Örlü
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Reynolds Shear Stress ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Normal Velocity ◽  
Low Reynolds ◽  
Inflow Conditions

AbstractA recent assessment of available direct numerical simulation (DNS) data from turbulent boundary layer flows (Schlatter & Örlü,J. Fluid Mech., vol. 659, 2010, pp. 116–126) showed surprisingly large differences not only in the skin friction coefficient or shape factor, but also in their predictions of mean and fluctuation profiles far into the sublayer. While such differences are expected at very low Reynolds numbers and/or the immediate vicinity of the inflow or tripping region, it remains unclear whether inflow and tripping effects explain the differences observed even at moderate Reynolds numbers. This question is systematically addressed by re-simulating the DNS of a zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer flow by Schlatteret al. (Phys. Fluids, vol. 21, 2009, art. 051702). The previous DNS serves as the baseline simulation, and the new DNS with a range of physically different inflow conditions and tripping effects are carefully compared. The downstream evolution of integral quantities as well as mean and fluctuation profiles is analysed, and the results show that different inflow conditions and tripping effects do indeed explain most of the differences observed when comparing available DNS at low Reynolds number. It is further found that, if transition is initiated inside the boundary layer at a low enough Reynolds number (based on the momentum-loss thickness)${\mathit{Re}}_{\theta } \lt 300$, all quantities agree well for both inner and outer layer for${\mathit{Re}}_{\theta } \gt 2000$. This result gives a lower limit for meaningful comparisons between numerical and/or wind tunnel experiments, assuming that the flow was not severely over- or understimulated. It is further shown that even profiles of the wall-normal velocity fluctuations and Reynolds shear stress collapse for higher${\mathit{Re}}_{\theta } $irrespective of the upstream conditions. In addition, the overshoot in the total shear stress within the sublayer observed in the DNS of Wu & Moin (Phys. Fluids, vol. 22, 2010, art. 085105) has been identified as a feature of transitional boundary layers.

Calculation of a Turbulent Boundary Layer Downstream of a Small Step Change in Surface Roughness

1975 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
R A Antonia ◽  
D H Wood
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Shear Stress ◽  
Step Change ◽  
Rough Wall ◽  
Small Step ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Good Agreement

SummaryMeasurements of mean velocity and Reynolds shear stress have been made in a turbulent boundary layer downstream of a small step change in surface roughness. Upstream of the step the surface is smooth, while downstream it consists of a d-type rough wall made up by a series of two-dimensional elements of square cross section placed transversely across the flow and spaced one element width apart in the direction of the flow. The calculated mean velocity and Reynolds shear stress profiles obtained using the method of Bradshaw, Ferriss and Atwell are in good agreement with the measurements throughout the relaxation region of the layer. Well downstream the calculation method adequately reproduces the self-preserving features of a d-type rough wall.

Effect of Reynolds number on drag reduction in turbulent boundary layer flow over liquid–gas interface

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (12) ◽  
pp. 122111
Author(s):  
Hongyuan Li ◽  
SongSong Ji ◽  
Xiangkui Tan ◽  
Zexiang Li ◽  
Yaolei Xiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Drag Reduction ◽  
Boundary Layer Flow ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer Flow ◽  
Layer Flow

The accelerated fully rough turbulent boundary layer

1977 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 507-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh W. Coleman ◽  
Robert J. Moffat ◽  
William M. Kays
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Stress Tensor ◽  
Skin Friction ◽  
Shape Factor ◽  
Reynolds Shear Stress ◽  
Smooth Wall ◽  
Mean Velocity

The behaviour of a fully rough turbulent boundary layer subjected to favourable pressure gradients both with and without blowing was investigated experimentally using a porous test surface composed of densely packed spheres of uniform size. Measurements of profiles of mean velocity and the components of the Reynolds-stress tensor are reported for both unblown and blown layers. Skin-friction coefficients were determined from measurements of the Reynolds shear stress and mean velocity.An appropriate acceleration parameterKrfor fully rough layers is defined which is dependent on a characteristic roughness dimension but independent of molecular viscosity. For a constant blowing fractionFgreater than or equal to zero, the fully rough turbulent boundary layer reaches an equilibrium state whenKris held constant. Profiles of the mean velocity and the components of the Reynolds-stress tensor are then similar in the flow direction and the skin-friction coefficient, momentum thickness, boundary-layer shape factor and the Clauser shape factor and pressure-gradient parameter all become constant.Acceleration of a fully rough layer decreases the normalized turbulent kinetic energy and makes the turbulence field much less isotropic in the inner region (forFequal to zero) compared with zero-pressure-gradient fully rough layers. The values of the Reynolds-shear-stress correlation coefficients, however, are unaffected by acceleration or blowing and are identical with values previously reported for smooth-wall and zero-pressure-gradient rough-wall flows. Increasing values of the roughness Reynolds number with acceleration indicate that the fully rough layer does not tend towards the transitionally rough or smooth-wall state when accelerated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document