Reversible nasal airway obstruction: does change in nasal peak inspiratory flow following decongestion predict response to topical steroids in chronic rhinosinusitis patients?

2012 ◽  
Vol 126 (12) ◽  
pp. 1238-1240 ◽  
Author(s):  
N K F Koo Ng ◽  
D Young ◽  
G W McGarry

AbstractBackground:Predicting which chronic rhinosinusitis patients have nasal obstruction due to reversible mucosal inflammation could prevent unnecessary surgery.Aim:To investigate whether the change in nasal peak inspiratory flow following maximal decongestion (i.e. mucosal reversibility) at first visit predicts the response to topical steroids in chronic rhinosinusitis patients, as measured by the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test.Methods:Prospective study of 128 consecutive new adult patients presenting with nasal obstruction due to chronic rhinosinusitis (January 2008 to July 2010). The 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test questionnaire was administered and the nasal peak inspiratory flow assessed. Following maximal nasal decongestion, the nasal peak inspiratory flow was again tested and the difference calculated. Topical steroids were administered for at least six weeks. The 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test was then repeated and the difference calculated.Results:Data were analysed using means and correlation studies (Spearman's rank correlation). There was no correlation between the pre- versus post-decongestion nasal peak inspiratory flow difference and the pre- versus post-steroid 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test difference, in chronic rhinosinusitis patients with or without nasal polyps.Conclusion:The difference between pre- and post-decongestion nasal peak inspiratory flow does not predict chronic rhinosinusitis patients' response to topical steroids.

2014 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Chin ◽  
G. Marcells ◽  
J. Malek ◽  
E. Pratt ◽  
R. Sacks ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-121
Author(s):  
D. Chin ◽  
G. Marcells ◽  
J. Malek ◽  
E. Pratt ◽  
R. Sacks ◽  
...  

Background: Identifying the cause of nasal obstruction is critical before surgical intervention. Structural nasal obstruction, due to nasal valve stenosis, is unlikely to benefit from simple septoplasty and turbinate reduction. This study assesses changes in nasal peak inspiratory flow (NPIF) as a tool for discriminating decongestable versus structural obstruction. Methodology: Cross-sectional study of patients undergoing nasal airflow assessment was performed. Rhinomanometry, nasal obstruction visual analogue scores (VAS) and NPIF were performed pre- and post-decongestion. Population groups were defined with decongestable or structural obstruction by relative post-decongestion changes in airways resistance and symptoms. Results: Fifty two patients were assessed, 24 with decongestable, 28 with structural obstruction. Pre- and post-decongestion NPIF were similar between groups. Absolute and percentage NPIF change were larger with decongestable versus structural obstruction. Sensitivity and specificity for predicting decongestable obstruction were 75.0% and 60.7% for NPIF increase >20 L/min; 75.0% and 64.3% for NPIF increase >20%. The respective positive predictive values were 62.1% and 64.3%. Conclusion: NPIF increase after decongestion is larger with decongestable than structural nasal obstruction. NPIF alone cannot discriminate the two conditions and does not replace more formal assessment.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mads Henrik Strand Moxness ◽  
Vegard Bugten ◽  
Wenche Moe Thorstensen ◽  
Ståle Nordgård

Background. The difference in nasal obstruction between OSA patients and healthy individuals is not adequately documented. Our aim was to describe the sinonasal quality of life and nasal function in OSA patients and healthy controls using the sinonasal outcome test-20 (SNOT-20), nasal obstruction visual analog scale (NO-VAS), and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF). Methodology and Principal. Ninety-three OSA patients and 92 controls were included in a case-control study from 2010 to 2015. Results. Mean SNOT-20 score in the OSA group was 1.69 (SD 0.84) compared to 0.55 (SD 0.69) in controls (p<0.001, 95% CI [0.9, 1.4]). The mean NO-VAS score was 41.3 (SD 12.8) and 14.7 (SD 14.4) in the OSA group and controls, respectively, (p<0.001, 95% CI [22.7, 30.6]). PNIF measured 105 litres/minute in the OSA group and 117 litres/minute in controls (p<0.01, 95% CI [−21.8, −3.71]). There was a positive correlation between subjective nasal obstruction and change in PNIF after decongestion in the control group alone. Conclusions. OSA patients have a reduced sinonasal QoL and lower peak nasal inspiratory flow compared to controls. Treatment of nasal obstruction in OSA patients should be made a priority along with treatment of the ailment itself.


1999 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 654
Author(s):  
Chang Hyeok An ◽  
Byung Hun Lee ◽  
Yong Bum Park ◽  
Jae Chul Choi ◽  
Hyun Suk Jee ◽  
...  

CHEST Journal ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 112 (6) ◽  
pp. 1547-1553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Il Cho ◽  
Russ Hauser ◽  
David C. Christiani

2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 256-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. G. C. M. Van Zoest ◽  
A. M. Van Der Weij ◽  
E. J. Duiverman ◽  
A. Akerlund ◽  
J. M. Kouwenberg

2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.W. Barry ◽  
N.P. Mason ◽  
J-P. Richalet

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document