scholarly journals Characteristics and clinical use of ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials for evaluating paediatric candidates for cochlear implants

2016 ◽  
Vol 131 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
X-D Xu ◽  
J Hu ◽  
Q Zhang ◽  
Y Zhang ◽  
X-T Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Inner Ear ◽  
Temporal Bone ◽  
Cochlear Implants ◽  
Bone Structure ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential ◽  
Myogenic Potential ◽  
Ear Malformations

AbstractObjective:This study aimed to define the characteristics and use of ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials for evaluating paediatric cochlear implant candidates.Methods:Ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials of 34 paediatric cochlear implant candidates were analysed. All patients also underwent a routine audiological examination, including computed tomography.Results:In all, 27 patients with normal inner-ear structures had absent or impaired vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses. In paediatric candidates with inner-ear malformations, ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials had lower thresholds and higher amplitudes. Vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses in this cohort were classified into three groups. There was significant concordance between vestibular evoked myogenic potentials and temporal bone computed tomography findings.Conclusion:Ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential waveforms were different in paediatric candidates with normal and abnormal inner-ear structures. Therefore, vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses can indicate temporal bone structure.

scholarly journals Cochlear Implant Outcomes and Genetic Mutations in Children with Ear and Brain Anomalies

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Micol Busi ◽  
Monica Rosignoli ◽  
Alessandro Castiglione ◽  
Federica Minazzi ◽  
Patrizia Trevisi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Inner Ear ◽  
Cochlear Implants ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Developmental Disorders ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Brain Abnormalities ◽  
Brain Anomalies ◽  
Ear Malformations

Background. Specific clinical conditions could compromise cochlear implantation outcomes and drastically reduce the chance of an acceptable development of perceptual and linguistic capabilities. These conditions should certainly include the presence of inner ear malformations or brain abnormalities. The aims of this work were to study the diagnostic value of high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in children with sensorineural hearing loss who were candidates for cochlear implants and to analyse the anatomic abnormalities of the ear and brain in patients who underwent cochlear implantation. We also analysed the effects of ear malformations and brain anomalies on the CI outcomes, speculating on their potential role in the management of language developmental disorders.Methods. The present study is a retrospective observational review of cochlear implant outcomes among hearing-impaired children who presented ear and/or brain anomalies at neuroimaging investigations with MRI and HRCT. Furthermore, genetic results from molecular genetic investigations (GJB2/GJB6and, additionally, in selected cases,SLC26A4or mitochondrial-DNA mutations) on this study group were herein described. Longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis was conducted using statistical tests.Results. Between January 1, 1996 and April 1, 2012, at the ENT-Audiology Department of the University Hospital of Ferrara, 620 cochlear implantations were performed. There were 426 implanted children at the time of the present study (who were <18 years). Among these, 143 patients (64 females and 79 males) presented ear and/or brain anomalies/lesions/malformations at neuroimaging investigations with MRI and HRCT. The age of the main study group (143 implanted children) ranged from 9 months and 16 years (average = 4.4; median = 3.0).Conclusions. Good outcomes with cochlear implants are possible in patients who present with inner ear or brain abnormalities, even if central nervous system anomalies represent a negative prognostic factor that is made worse by the concomitant presence of cochlear malformations. Common cavity and stenosis of the internal auditory canal (less than 2 mm) are negative prognostic factors even if brain lesions are absent.

Cochlear Implants in Children: Reliability of Computed Tomography

1992 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. 410-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Seicshnaydre ◽  
Michele H. Johnson ◽  
M. Suzanne Hasenstab ◽  
George H. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Temporal Bone ◽  
Cochlear Implants ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Presurgical Evaluation ◽  
Preoperative Ct ◽  
Ct Studies

Preoperative temporal bone computed tomography (CT) can demonstrate anatomic details relevant to surgical management and is therefore essential in the presurgical evaluation of patients receiving cochlear implants. The purpose of this study was to evaluate preoperative CT studies and compare them to surgical findings in 34 children who received the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. The focus of this report is to discuss the dependability of CT scans in predicting surgical findings at the time of cochlear implantation. Results indicate that agreement of CT interpretations with surgical findings is partially related to the etiology of hearing loss and the experience of the surgeon and neuroradiologist. Advantages and limitations of the CT scans in predicting surgical findings are discussed.

scholarly journals Severe and persistent facial nerve stimulation after cochlear implantation in a patient with cochlear–facial dehiscence: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (11) ◽  
pp. 030006052110578
Author(s):  
Jingyuan Chen ◽  
Biao Chen ◽  
Lifang Zhang ◽  
Yongxin Li
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Facial Nerve ◽  
Inner Ear ◽  
Cochlear Implants ◽  
Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Computed Tomography Images ◽  
Ear Malformations ◽  
Facial Nerve Stimulation

Generally, cochlear implants (CIs) are effective in helping patients improve their hearing performance; however, some patients have poor hearing performance owing to facial nerve stimulation (FNS), which is often associated with cochlear anomalies. We report a case with a normal cochlea and severe and persistent FNS owing to cochlear–facial dehiscence (CFD) that affected the CI outcomes. Preoperatively, a careful review of the computed tomography images before CI surgery is necessary not only for patients with otosclerosis and inner ear malformations but also for patients with normal cochlear structures because facial nerve anomalies could be present.

A new cochlear implant electrode with a “cork”-type stopper for inner ear malformations

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 331-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Levent Sennaroğlu ◽  
Gamze Atay ◽  
Münir Demir Bajin
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Inner Ear ◽  
Inner Ear Malformations ◽  
Ear Malformations

Role of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in detecting the Prevalence of inner ear anomalies among cochlear implant candidates

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alaa Nasser Hussain Zaher ◽  
Tougan Taha Abd El Aziz ◽  
Ahmed Samy Abdelrahman
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Inner Ear ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
High Resolution Computed Tomography ◽  
Vestibular Aqueduct ◽  
Incomplete Partition ◽  
Ear Anomalies

Abstract Background Hearing loss management using cochlear implants in patients with inner ear anomalies has long been discussed in the otology community. Magnetic resonances imaging (B,/IRI) and Computed tomography (CT) play important roles in the preoperative assessment of inner ear abnormalities such as cochlear nerve deficiency and variant anatomy as these abnormalities may not only affect the decision of the implantation procedure or the patient's prognosis regarding auditory improvement, but also the risk of complications. Objective To examine the prevalence of inner ear anomalies among cochlear implant recipients in patients with congenital sensorineural hearing loss among the pediatric age group in the Demerdash hospital, Ain Shams university using High resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and MRI imaging. Methods A retrospective descriptive study over the course of 9 months that included all patients that are candidates for cochlear implant referred to the Radiology department, Ain Shams University Hospitals for a preoperative imaging in the form of CT and VIRI scans. Results CT and MRI scans of 33 patients who had congenital hearing loss and were candidates for cochlear implantation with total 66 ears were reviewed. Inner ear anomalies were identified in 8 patients representing a prevalence (24.2%) with 14 ear diseased. Anomalies were seen bilaterally in 6 patients and unilaterally in 2 patients. Among the 14 diseased ear, 9 ears (64.3%) were seen with incomplete partition Il, 7 ears (50%) were seen with enlarged vestibular aqueduct, 4 ears (28.6%) were seen with cochlear hypoplasia, 3 ears (21.4%) were seen with semicircular canal aplasia, 2 ears (14.3%) were seen with incomplete partition type I, 2 ears (14.3%) were seen with cochlear nerve aplasia, 2 ears with cochlear aplasia (14.3%), I ear (7.1%) was seen with common cavity ear (7.1%) with complete labyrinthine aplasia. Conclusion Prevalence of inner ear anomalies among cochlear implant candidates was 24.2%. This result is consistent with results worldwide and the most common anomalies were Incomplete partition Il and large vestibular aqueduct. Abbreviations Computed tomography (CT), Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), High resolution computed tomography (HRCT), Internal auditory canal (IAC), Cerebellopontine angle (CPA).

scholarly journals The Effect of Pulling Out Cochlear Implant Electrodes on Inner Ear Microstructures: A Temporal Bone Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingo Todt ◽  
Rainer O. Seidl ◽  
Arne Ernst
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Inner Ear ◽  
Temporal Bone ◽  
Basilar Membrane ◽  
Temporal Sequence ◽  
Pull Out ◽  
Temporal Bones

The exchange of an cochlear implant or the re-positioning of an electrode have become more frequently required than a decade ago. The consequences of such procedures at a microstructural level within the cochlea are not known. It was the aim of the present study to further investigate the effects of an CI electrode pull-out. Therefore 10 freshly harvested temporal bones (TB) were histologically evaluated after a cochlear implant electrode pull-out of a perimodiolar electrode. In additional 9 TB the intrascalar movements of the CI electrode while being pulled-out were digitally analysed by video- capturing. Histologically, a disruption of the modiolar wall or the spiral osseous lamina were not observed. In one TB, a basilar membrane lifting up was found, but it could not be undoubtedly attributed to the pull-out of the electrode. When analyzing the temporal sequence of the electrode movement during the pull-out, the electrode turned in one case so that the tip elevates the basilar membrane. The pull- out of perimodiolarly placed CI electrodes does not damage the modiolar wall at a microstructural level and should be guided (e.g., forceps) to prevent a 90 o turning of the electrode tip into the direction of the basilar membrane.

scholarly journals Facial nerve anomalies in paediatric cochlear implant candidates: radiological evaluation

2016 ◽  
Vol 131 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
F B Palabiyik ◽  
K Hacikurt ◽  
Z Yazici
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
High Resolution ◽  
Facial Nerve ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Inner Ear ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
High Resolution Computed Tomography ◽  
Ear Anomalies

AbstractBackground:Pre-operative radiological identification of facial nerve anomalies can help prevent intra-operative facial nerve injury during cochlear implantation. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and configuration of facial nerve anomalies and their concurrence with inner-ear anomalies in cochlear implant candidates.Methods:Inner-ear and concomitant facial nerve anomalies were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging and temporal high-resolution computed tomography in 48 children with congenital sensorineural hearing loss who were cochlear implant candidates.Results:Inner-ear anomalies were present in 11 out of 48 patients (23 per cent) and concomitant facial nerve anomalies were present on 7 sides in 4 patients (7 per cent of the total). Facial nerve anomalies were accompanied by cochlear or vestibular malformation.Conclusion:Potential facial nerve abnormalities should always be considered in patients with inner-ear anomalies. Pre-operative facial nerve imaging can increase the surgeon's confidence to plan and perform cochlear implantation. Magnetic resonance imaging should be used to detect inner-ear anomalies; if these are identified, temporal high-resolution computed tomography should be used to evaluate the facial nerve.

Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Inner Ear

1988 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 494-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert K. Jackler ◽  
William P. Dillon
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Inner Ear ◽  
Semicircular Canals ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
High Resolution Computed Tomography ◽  
Membranous Labyrinth ◽  
Prosthetic Devices ◽  
Ear Malformations

The majority of temporal bone radiographic studies are obtained either for middle ear and mastoid disease or in the evaluation of retrocochlear pathology. With recent technologic advances, diagnostic imaging of the inner ear has developed an increasing role in the evaluation and management of diseases that affect the cochlea, semicircular canals, and the vestibular and cochlear aqueducts. High-resolution computed tomography (CT) provides excellent detail of the osseous labyrinth, whereas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) generates images derived from the membranous labyrinth and its associated neural elements. Optimal techniques for obtaining high quality CT and MRI images of the normal and diseased inner ear are presented. CT has proved useful in the evaluation of inner ear malformations, cochlear otosclerosis, labyrinthine fistulization from cholesteatoma, translabyrinthine fractures, otic capsule osteodystrophies, in the assessment of cochlear patency before cochlear implantation, and in the localization of prosthetic devices such as stapes wires and cochlear implants. While MRI produces discernible images of the soft tissue and fluid components of the inner ear, it has yet to demonstrate any unique advantages in the evaluation of inner ear disease. However, MRI produces excellent and highly useful images of the audiovestibular and facial nerves, cerebellopontine angle, and brain.

Comparison of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials elicited by click and short duration tone burst stimuli

2010 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Kumar ◽  
S Kumar Sinha ◽  
A Kumar Bharti ◽  
A Barman
Keyword(s):  
Short Duration ◽  
Clinical Assessment ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Tone Burst ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential ◽  
Acoustic Stimuli ◽  
Myogenic Potential ◽  
Electrical Impulses

AbstractIntroduction:Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials are short latency electrical impulses that are produced in response to higher level acoustic stimuli. They are used clinically to diagnose sacculocollic pathway dysfunction.Aim:This study aimed to compare the vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses elicited by click stimuli and short duration tone burst stimuli, in normal hearing individuals.Method:Seventeen subjects participated. In all subjects, we assessed vestibular evoked myogenic potentials elicited by click and short duration tone burst stimuli.Results and conclusion:The latency of the vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses (i.e. the p13 and n23 peaks) was longer for tone burst stimuli compared with click stimuli. The amplitude of the p13–n23 waveform was greater for tone burst stimuli than click stimuli. Thus, the click stimulus may be preferable for clinical assessment and identification of abnormalities as this stimulus has less variability, while a low frequency tone burst stimulus may be preferable when assessing the presence or absence of vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document