What works to address prejudice? Look to developmental science research for the answer

2012 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 439-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Killen ◽  
Kelly Lynn Mulvey ◽  
Aline Hitti ◽  
Adam Rutland
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognitive ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Status Quo ◽  
Moral Judgments ◽  
Childhood And Adolescence ◽  
What Works ◽  
Developmental Science ◽  
The Status ◽  
Historically Disadvantaged

AbstractDevelopmental perspectives on prejudice provide a fundamental and important key to the puzzle for determining how to address prejudice. Research with historically disadvantaged and advantaged groups in childhood and adolescence reveals the complexity of social cognitive and moral judgments about prejudice, discrimination, bias, and exclusion. Children are aware of status and hierarchies, and often reject the status quo. Intervention, to be effective, must happen early in development, before prejudice and stereotypes are deeply entrenched.

scholarly journals „Efekt aureoli” i „efekt uczestnictwa” a niezależność prawników-naukowców

2017 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. 133-148
Author(s):  
Jolanta Jabłońska-Bonca
Keyword(s):  
Mass Media ◽  
21St Century ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Status Quo ◽  
Occupational Roles ◽  
The World ◽  
The Status ◽  
Ethics Of Research ◽  
The Mass Media

“THE EFFECT OF AUREOLE” AND “EFFECT OF PARTICIPATION” IN THE LIGHT OF INDEPENDENCE OF LAWYERS-SCIENTISTSThe purpose of the text is to signal the need to investigate the conditions for the preserva­tion of the independence of lawyers who practice and simultaneously engage in science. Research independence is understood in the text as loyalty to the principles of methodology and ethics of research. There have been, and will be, lawyers-scientists who are creative, well-skilled to do re­search, and also autonomous, capable of criticizing the status quo, striving for truth no matter what the consequences. In the 21st century, being in such aposition is getting harder and harder. This is due to the fact that many lawyers-scientists concurrently perform important social and occupational roles besides scientific research. The article focuses on two examples of conditions that hinder the preservation of independence and entice lawyers-scientists into the world of politics and ideology. It is: a the activity of lawyers-scientists in the mass media and the consequences of the so-called “aureole effect”, as well as b the “dual occupancy” and the meaning of “participation effect”.

scholarly journals The Research Method we Need or Deserve? A Literature Review of the Design Science Research Landscape

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadhg Nagle ◽  
Cathal Doyle ◽  
Ibrahim Alhassan ◽  
David Sammon
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Design Science ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Design Science Research ◽  
Status Quo ◽  
Actual Performance ◽  
Community Needs ◽  
Coding Scheme ◽  
Senior Scholar ◽  
The Status

Despite multiple efforts by senior scholars, Design Science Research is viewed as underperforming given its distinct value for the IS domain. Conducting a descriptive literature review, this study sets out to survey the DSR landscape in the Senior Scholar Basket to measure the actual performance of DSR and provide a benchmark for future DSR strategies and studies. Reviewing 111 studies using a coding scheme developed over seven iterations, the status quo of DSR is depicted and analyzed. The results present: (i) the current balance between theoretical and practical impacts achieved in DSR, (ii) a pattern of perpetual black box prototyping, and (iii) a reluctance to tackle real-world messy problems and deliver practically useful artefacts. Finally, the study provides the IS community with the opportunity to reflect on the shape DSR has taken and decide if indeed this is what the community needs or deserves.

scholarly journals The Research Method we Need or Deserve? A Literature Review of the Design Science Research Landscape

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadhg Nagle ◽  
Cathal Doyle ◽  
Ibrahim Alhassan ◽  
David Sammon
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Design Science ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Design Science Research ◽  
Status Quo ◽  
Actual Performance ◽  
Community Needs ◽  
Coding Scheme ◽  
Senior Scholar ◽  
The Status

Despite multiple efforts by senior scholars, Design Science Research is viewed as underperforming given its distinct value for the IS domain. Conducting a descriptive literature review, this study sets out to survey the DSR landscape in the Senior Scholar Basket to measure the actual performance of DSR and provide a benchmark for future DSR strategies and studies. Reviewing 111 studies using a coding scheme developed over seven iterations, the status quo of DSR is depicted and analyzed. The results present: (i) the current balance between theoretical and practical impacts achieved in DSR, (ii) a pattern of perpetual black box prototyping, and (iii) a reluctance to tackle real-world messy problems and deliver practically useful artefacts. Finally, the study provides the IS community with the opportunity to reflect on the shape DSR has taken and decide if indeed this is what the community needs or deserves.

scholarly journals What and How We See Matters: Critical Theories for Anti-Racist Adolescent Research

2021 ◽  
pp. 074355842110451
Author(s):  
Mariah Kornbluh ◽  
Leoandra Onnie Rogers ◽  
Joanna Lee Williams
Keyword(s):  
Adolescent Development ◽  
Ways Of Knowing ◽  
Status Quo ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Critical Theories ◽  
Developmental Science ◽  
The Status ◽  
Critical Approaches ◽  
Multiple Ways Of Knowing

The second installment of the Special Issue “Critical Approaches to Adolescent Development: Reflections on theories and methods for pursuing anti-racist developmental science” focuses primarily on theory and the theoretical lenses that shape how we “see” adolescents. Such a focus is necessary for moving forward anti-racist adolescent research. Theories serve as starting points, establishing our assumptions about what we know, the place where we move from. We cannot “do” better research if we do not take stock of what we “know” and more critically “how” we know it. The authors in this issue do this with candor, clarity, and intentionality, offering us theoretical frames that identify, name, and destabilize the status quo. They offer us anti-racist lenses and language to (re)define what adolescence and adolescent development is and does—and what it ought to be. They present theories that embed action and activism, that move us—across disciplines, outside of academic spaces, and into spaces that are often silenced and invisible. They shift our vision from objective, white-centric knowledge to multiple ways of knowing. It is our hope that the contributions in this double Special Issue will change how we see and do research with adolescents, and also change us as scholars and humans.

Prejudice toward immigrant groups: How perceptions of ingroup discrimination moderate the effect of challenges to the status quo

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amber L. Garcia ◽  
Michael T. Schmitt ◽  
Naomi Ellemers ◽  
Nyla R. Branscombe
Keyword(s):  
Status Quo ◽  
The Status
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document