Celestial Reference Systems Derivable from Solar System Dynamics

1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 223-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. Duncombe ◽  
P. K. Seidelmann ◽  
T. C. Van Flandern

AbstractSolar system dynamics define a number of planes which could be the basis of a coordinate system. The equatorial, ecliptic, invariant, and planetary orbit planes are compared to an inertial coordinate system. Selection of a fiducial point requires consideration of precession and equinox motion and the relationships between the coordinate system of the celestial sphere, observed hour angles and the terrestrial longitude system. A time system might be based on the rotation of the Earth, the motion of the Sun, Moon and planets, or some nondynamical repetitive phenomena. Consideration must be given to the difficulties of the various systems, such as the irregrular rotation of the Earth, the uncertain tidal friction and anomalies of the Moon’s motion, the rapidity and accuracy of time determination-, and relativistic effects.

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (09) ◽  
pp. 1750117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuele Battista ◽  
Giampiero Esposito ◽  
Luciano Di Fiore ◽  
Simone Dell’Agnello ◽  
Jules Simo ◽  
...  

Recent work in the literature has advocated using the Earth–Moon–planetoid Lagrangian points as observables, in order to test general relativity and effective field theories of gravity in the solar system. However, since the three-body problem of classical celestial mechanics is just an approximation of a much more complicated setting, where all celestial bodies in the solar system are subject to their mutual gravitational interactions, while solar radiation pressure and other sources of nongravitational perturbations also affect the dynamics, it is conceptually desirable to improve the current understanding of solar system dynamics in general relativity, as a first step towards a more accurate theoretical study of orbital motion in the weak-gravity regime. For this purpose, starting from the Einstein equations in the de Donder–Lanczos gauge, this paper arrives first at the Levi-Civita Lagrangian for the geodesic motion of planets, showing in detail under which conditions the effects of internal structure and finite extension get canceled in general relativity to first post-Newtonian order. The resulting nonlinear ordinary differential equations for the motion of planets and satellites are solved for the Earth’s orbit about the Sun, written down in detail for the Sun–Earth–Moon system, and investigated for the case of planar motion of a body immersed in the gravitational field produced by the other bodies (e.g. planets with their satellites). At this stage, we prove an exact property, according to which the fourth-order time derivative of the original system leads to a linear system of ordinary differential equations. This opens an interesting perspective on forthcoming research on planetary motions in general relativity within the solar system, although the resulting equations remain a challenge for numerical and qualitative studies. Last, the evaluation of quantum corrections to location of collinear and noncollinear Lagrangian points for the planar restricted three-body problem is revisited, and a new set of theoretical values of such corrections for the Earth–Moon–planetoid system is displayed and discussed. On the side of classical values, the general relativity corrections to Newtonian values for collinear and noncollinear Lagrangian points of the Sun–Earth–planetoid system are also obtained. A direction for future research will be the analysis of planetary motions within the relativistic celestial mechanics set up by Blanchet, Damour, Soffel and Xu.


1985 ◽  
Vol 38 (02) ◽  
pp. 216-217
Author(s):  
G. A. Wilkins

New techniques of measurement make it possible in 1984 to determine positions on the surface of the Earth to a much higher precision than was possible in 1884. If we look beyond the requirements of navigation we can see useful applications of global geodetic positioning to centimetric accuracy for such purposes as the control of mapping and the study of crustal movements. These new techniques depend upon observations of external objects, such as satellites or quasars rather than stars, and they require that the positions of these objects and the orientation of the surface of the Earth are both known with respect to an appropriate external reference system that is ‘fixed’ in space. We need networks of observing stations and analysis centres that monitor the motions of the external objects and the rotation of the Earth. Observations of stars by a transit circle are no longer adequate for this purpose.


1990 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 213-217
Author(s):  
Jeanne E. Bishop

Many educators have found that models can add a lot to the understanding of astronomical concepts. Attractive commercial models of the solar system and celestial globes are readily available. Many models can be constructed of common materials — I found in my doctoral dissertation work that models made and manipulated by students increased retention of concepts of the celestial sphere and rotation, the seasons, lunar phases, and planet motions.But there is another type of model which I have found very successful. I call it the “dynamic human model.” Actually, the concept is not new. I know that many good teachers have a favorite demonstration in which one or more students represent the Earth, sun, or moon. Also, the Elementary-School Science Project of the University of Illinois contained activities for student models to distinguish between Ptolemaic and Copernican systems. However, I do not think the idea has been extended as far as it should be. I would like to suggest ideas for dynamic human models beyond what I have seen elsewhere.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document