Editorial: Operationalizing child maltreatment: Developmental processes and outcomes

2001 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 755-757 ◽  
Author(s):  
DANTE CICCHETTI ◽  
JODY TODD MANLY

Significant advances have occurred in our knowledge of the effects of maltreatment on the developmental process since the “battered child syndrome” (Kempe, Silverman, Steele, Droegemueller, & Silver, 1962) was first identified. In fact, during the mid-1980s and onward, the quality and methodological sophistication of investigations of the developmental sequelae of child maltreatment increased dramatically (for summaries, see Cicchetti & Lynch, 1995, and Cicchetti & Toth, 2000). However, overall progress has been hampered by a lack of consensus on the operationalization of the construct of child maltreatment (Barnett, Manly, & Cicchetti, 1993; Besharov, 1981; Cicchetti & Rizley, 1981; Giovannoni & Becerra, 1979). In recognition of the complexities accompanying definitional issues in the area of maltreatment, a decade ago a Special Issue of Development and Psychopathology was devoted to defining psychological maltreatment (Cicchetti, 1991). The challenges associated with defining maltreatment were again highlighted in a Special Issue of Development and Psychopathology that addressed advances and challenges in the study of the sequelae of child maltreatment (Cicchetti, 1994a). In the editorial to that issue, Cicchetti (1994b) concluded that “the lack of consensus regarding the definition of maltreatment employed by various investigators [had] made comparability across studies difficult to achieve” (p. 2).

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1972 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 160-162
Author(s):  
William B. Forsyth ◽  
John E. Allen ◽  
Joseph W. Brinkley ◽  
Alice D. Chenoweth ◽  
Gertrude Hunter ◽  
...  

In February 1966, the Committee on Infant and Preschool Child published a statement concerning the status of the problem of the battered child. The present Committee has reevaluated the statement in light of increased knowledge and experience over the past 6 years. The 1966 statement concerned itself primarily with two issues: (1) a historical review and definition of the battered child syndrome, and (2) discussion and recommendations concerning identification and protection of the abused child. While a great deal of study and activity has taken place with regard to the problem of the battered child and there have been some positive results (e.g., every state in the union now has some form of reporting mechanism of the suspected or proven case of child abuse), the consensus of the Committee and its consultants is that the total problem has become magnified and is uncontrolled by present methods of management. The Committee reaffirms and supports the following recommendations of the 1966 report: 1. Physicians should continue to be required to report suspected instances of child abuse immediately to the agency legally charged with the responsibility of investigating child abuse, preferably the county or state department of welfare or health or its local representatives, or to the nearest law enforcement agency. 2. The responsible agency must have ample personnel and resources to take action immediately on receipt of the report. 3. Reported cases should be evaluated promptly, and appropriate service should be provided for the child and family. 4. The child should be protected by the agency by continued hospitalization, supervision at home, or removal from home through family or juvenile court action.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Lauer ◽  
Elsa Ten Broeck ◽  
Moses Grossman

The medical and social service records of the 130 battered children under 10 years of age admitted to San Francisco General Hospital during a six-year period, July 1, 1965, to June 30, 1971, were reviewed. Only children with physical injuries were included. A control group was selected from concurrent admissions. The findings showed a steadily rising number of admissions for child abuse. Many of the children suffered from emotional, physical and medical neglect as well as intentional trauma and 44% had been abused previously. Six children died. Sixty-three percent of the battered children were less than 2 years old. Their parents were significantly younger than parents of controls and also much more transient. White children rather than nonwhite children were battered more often than expected when compared to the ethnic distribution of the control group.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1970 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 894-895
Author(s):  
Jacob Brem

A good deal of literature on child abuse has accumulated since Kempe and his group first described the "Battered Child Syndrome."1 Enlightened laws have been passed in the various states and management transferred from the police into the hands of social agencies. Furthermore, the reporting physician was protected from libel. However, at the grass root level, conditions are far from ideal. Physicians are unfamiliar with the various laws and are reluctant to report for fear of getting involved in unpleasant situations.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 330-330
Author(s):  
Rowland L. Mindlin ◽  
William M. Palmer

The Committee on Infant and Preschool Child and its Subcommittee on Child Abuse have received a number of requests for recommendations on the roentgenograms that should be taken routinely on a child suspected of being physically abused. We have consulted, among others, Frederic N. Silverman, M.D., a pediatric radiologist and a co-author with C. Henry Kempe, M.D., of the landmark article1 in which the term "battered child syndrome" was coined. We would like to bring Dr. Silverman's clear and reasoned response to the attention of all pediatricians, indeed to all physicians encountering children who may have been abused.


1975 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 174
Author(s):  
P.R. Van Ostenberg ◽  
W.R. Anderson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document