Assessment of left ventricular mass and volume by cross-sectional echocardiography in newborns and infants with tricuspid atresia prior to surgical intervention

1993 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-38
Author(s):  
Michael Vogel ◽  
Jan Skovaranek ◽  
Konrad Bühlmeyer
Keyword(s):  
Surface Area ◽  
Left Ventricular Mass ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Left Ventricular Volume ◽  
Ventricular Volume ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Tricuspid Atresia ◽  
Ventricular Mass ◽  
Normal Left Ventricular

SummaryBecause left ventricular mass may be important in judging feasibility of Fontan type of palliation in tricuspid atresia, this study was undertaken to generate data on left ventricular mass, volume and mass to volume ratio in newborns and infants with tricuspid atresia, native pulmonary stenosis and concordant ventriculoarterial connections prior to any surgical palliation to obtain values for “normal” left ventricular dimensions in tricuspid atresia. The left ventricle was evaluated in the apical two and four chamber view. From these two perpendicular imaging planes, we calculated mass as difference between epicardial and endocardial volume x 1.05 (specific gravity of heart muscle). Mass divided by volume at end-diastole yields the index: mass to volume. Data from 23 newborns and infants with tricuspid atresia were compared to data from 30 age-matched controls with normal hearts. In both patient and control groups, growth of the left ventricle was not linear but related to the 1.4 (volume) or 1.25 (mass) power of body surface area. The equation best describing relation between left ventricular volume and body surface area in normals is volume = 60.7(body surface area)1.4−0.2 ml; in patients with tricuspid atresia volume calculates as 96.7(body surface area)1.4+0.9 ml. In relation to normal infants, infants with tricuspid atresia had a left ventricular volume of 167 (135–206)% of normal and a left ventricular mass of 163 (132–201)% of normal. Left ventricular mass assessed in normals calculates as mass = 59.9(body surface area)1.25+1.3 grams; in patients with tricuspid atresia it calculates as mass= 117.5 (body surface area)1.25−0.9 grams. The index of left ventricular mass to volume in patients with tricuspid atresia measured 1.32, not significantly different from controls, in whom this index calculates as 1.34.

scholarly journals Maternal Cardiac Assessment at 35 to 37 Weeks Improves Prediction of Development of Preeclampsia

Hypertension ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 514-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Coral Garcia-Gonzalez ◽  
Georgios Georgiopoulos ◽  
Samira Abdel Azim ◽  
Fernando Macaya ◽  
Nikos Kametas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Area ◽  
Left Ventricular Mass ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Interquartile Range ◽  
Ventricular Mass ◽  
Cardiac Indices

Preeclampsia at term accounts for half of maternal deaths from hypertensive disorders. We aimed to assess differences in maternal cardiac indices at 35 +0 to 36 +6 weeks’ gestation between women who subsequently developed preeclampsia at term compared with those with uncomplicated pregnancy and to evaluate whether cardiac indices offer incremental prognostic value to the available screening algorithm for preeclampsia. We recruited 1602 women with singleton pregnancies who attended for a routine hospital visit at 35 +0 to 36 +6 weeks’ gestation between April and November 2018. We recorded maternal characteristics and preeclampsia-risk-score derived from a competing risks model and measured cardiac indices. Preeclampsia developed in 3.12% (50/1602) of participants. Women with preeclampsia, compared with those without, had increased mean arterial pressure (97.6, SD, 5.53 versus 87.9, SD, 6.82 mm Hg), systemic vascular resistance (1500, interquartile range, 1393–1831 versus 1400, interquartile range, 1202–1630 PRU) and preeclampsia-risk-score (23.4, interquartile range, 9.13–40 versus 0.9, interquartile range, 0.32–3.25). Multivariable analysis demonstrated independent association between the incidence of preeclampsia and E/e′ (hazard ratio, 1.19/unit [95% CI, 1.03–1.37]; P =0.018) as well as left ventricular mass indexed for body surface area (hazard ratio, 1.03/[g·m 2 ] [95% CI, 1.003–1.051]; P =0.029). Women with E/e′ ≥7.3 and left ventricular mass indexed for body surface area ≥63.2 g/m 2 had an increased risk for developing preeclampsia, despite low preeclampsia-risk-score <5% (hazard ratio, 20.1 [95% CI, 10.5–38.7], P <0.001). Increased left ventricular mass and E/e′ offer incremental information to available scoring systems and better stratify women at risk of developing preeclampsia at term.

Left ventricular mass by echocardiographic measures in children and adolescents

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 727-737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudhir K. Mehta
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Surface Area ◽  
Left Ventricular Mass ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Mass ◽  
Cardiovascular Morbidity And Mortality

AbstractBackgroundRecent evidence in adults suggests that left ventricular mass measured as left ventricular mass/height1.7 predicts cardiovascular morbidity and mortality better than the two widely used indices, left ventricular mass/body surface area and left ventricular mass/height2.7. Standards of left ventricular mass/height1.7 have not been reported in children, for whom, owing to lack of significant cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, body mass index has traditionally been used as a potential cardiovascular risk factor.MethodsIn this retrospective study, 692 clinically normal children aged 1 day to 18 years underwent detailed echocardiographic assessment to assess whether any of the left ventricular mass indices – left ventricular mass/height1.7, left ventricular mass/body surface area, and left ventricular mass/height2.7 – are associated with obesity as measured by body mass index. Correlations, t-tests, and linear regressions were used for statistical testing.ResultsLeft ventricular mass/height1.7 was better correlated (R2 = 0.36) with body mass index than left ventricular mass/body surface area (R2 = 0.179) and left ventricular mass/height2.7 (R2 = 0.006), although all three dependent variables show a significant correlation (p < 0.035). In addition, a higher percentage of obese patients were noted to have elevated left ventricular mass as measured by left ventricular mass/height1.7 than by the other two methods.ConclusionsLeft ventricular mass/height1.7 is a reliable indicator of obesity-associated left ventricular hypertrophy. Left ventricular mass/height1.7 can be used conveniently during transitions from youth to adults for long-term follow-up. These findings support the importance of including left ventricular mass/height1.7 in future studies of cardiovascular risks and preventive strategies in children and adolescents.

Limitations of Expressing Left Ventricular Mass Relative to Height and to Body Surface Area in Children

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 410-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bethany J. Foster ◽  
Tao Gao ◽  
Andrew S. Mackie ◽  
Babette S. Zemel ◽  
Huma Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Area ◽  
Left Ventricular Mass ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Mass

scholarly journals Left Ventricular Mass in Normal Children and its Correlation with Weight, Height and Body Surface Area

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 982-987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piraye Kervancioglu ◽  
Mehmet Kervancioglu ◽  
M. Cudi Tuncer ◽  
E. Savas Hatipoglu
Keyword(s):  
Surface Area ◽  
Left Ventricular Mass ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Normal Children ◽  
Ventricular Mass

scholarly journals Lean body mass is the strongest anthropometric predictor of left ventricular mass in the obese paediatric population

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 476-481
Author(s):  
James R. Shea ◽  
Melissa H. Henshaw ◽  
Janet Carter ◽  
Shahryar M. Chowdhury
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricular Hypertrophy ◽  
Surface Area ◽  
Left Ventricular Mass ◽  
Lean Body Mass ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Ventricular Hypertrophy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Obese Children ◽  
Ventricular Mass

AbstractBackground:Indexing left ventricular mass to body surface area or height2.7 leads to inaccuracies in diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy in obese children. Lean body mass predictive equations provide the opportunity to determine the utility of lean body mass in indexing left ventricular mass. Our objectives were to compare the diagnostic accuracy of predicted lean body mass, body surface area, and height in detecting abnormal left ventricle mass in obese children.Methods:Obese non-hypertensive patients aged 4–21 years were recruited prospectively. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to measure lean body mass. Height, weight, sex, race, and body mass index z-score were used to calculate predicted lean body mass.Results:We enrolled 328 patients. Average age was 12.6 ± 3.8 years. Measured lean body mass had the strongest relationship with left ventricular mass (R2 = 0.84, p < 0.01) compared to predicted lean body mass (R2 = 0.82, p < 0.01), body surface area (R2 = 0.80, p < 0.01), and height2.7 (R2 = 0.65, p < 0.01). Of the clinically derived variables, predicted lean body mass was the only measure to have an independent association with left ventricular mass (β = 0.90, p < 0.01). Predicted lean body mass was the most accurate scaling variable in detecting left ventricular hypertrophy (positive predictive value = 88%, negative predictive value = 99%).Conclusions:Lean body mass is the strongest predictor of left ventricular mass in obese children. Predicted lean body mass is the most accurate anthropometric scaling variable for left ventricular mass in left ventricular hypertrophy detection. Predicted lean body mass should be considered for clinical use as the body size correcting variable for left ventricular mass in obese children.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document