scholarly journals 26 A Phase 3 Study to Determine the Antipsychotic Efficacy and Safety of ALKS 3831 in Adult Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Schizophrenia

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 187-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven G Potkin ◽  
Jelena Kunovac ◽  
Bernard L Silverman ◽  
Adam Simmons ◽  
Ying Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Gain ◽  
Acute Exacerbation ◽  
Scale Score ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Study Objective ◽  
Antipsychotic Efficacy

AbstractBackgroundALKS 3831, currently under development for the treatment of schizophrenia, is composed of olanzapine (OLZ) and a fixed dose of 10mg of samidorphan. In a Phase 2 study in stable patients with schizophrenia, ALKS 3831mitigated OLZ-associated weight gain while maintaining an antipsychotic efficacy profile similar to OLZ.Study objectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of ALKS 3831 in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia.MethodsThis was a Phase 3, 4-week, randomized, double-blind, active and placebo (PBO)-controlled study of ALKS 3831 in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02634346). Eligible patients (N=403) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive ALKS 3831, OLZ, or PBO. Patients were treated in an inpatient setting for the first 2weeks of the study and could be treated as inpatients or outpatients for the remaining 2weeks. Patients were excluded if they received OLZ within 6months prior to screening. Antipsychotic efficacy was assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and Clinical Global Impression–Severity (CGI-S) and CGI–Improvement (CGI-I) scales. Safety and tolerability were assessed as adverse events (AEs).ResultsOf 401 randomized patients who received ALKS 3831, OLZ, or PBO, 91%, 89%, and 83% of patients, respectively, completed treatment. The most common reason for discontinuation was withdrawal by patient (6% in both the ALKS 3831and PBO groups, and 7% in the OLZ group). Baseline characteristics were generally similar between groups; however, baseline mean body mass index was higher in the OLZ group than in the ALKS 3831 group. Baseline mean±standard deviation scores were 101.7±11.9 for PANSS total score and 5.1±0.7 for CGI-S scale score. The mean OLZ dose was 18.4mg/day in both active treatment arms. Least squares (LS) mean difference±standard error (SE) vs PBO from baseline to Week 4 in PANSS total score was –6.4±1.8 (P<.001) for the ALKS 3831 group and –5.3±1.8 (P=.004) for the OLZ group. LS mean difference±SE vs PBO from baseline to Week 4 in CGI-S scale score was −0.4±0.1 (P=.002) for the ALKS3831 group and −0.4±0.1 (P<.001) for the OLZ group. The percentage of patients with improvement in PANSS response (≥30% from baseline) at Week 4 was 60%, 54%, and 38% in the ALKS 3831, OLZ, and PBO groups, respectively. The percentage of patients with an improvement in CGI-I scale response (score of ≤2) at Week 4 was 58%, 51%, and 33% in the ALKS 3831, OLZ, and PBO groups, respectively. Discontinuation due to AEs was low in all groups. Common AEs (≥5% in any group) included weight gain, somnolence, dry mouth, anxiety, headache, and schizophrenia.DiscussionTreatment with ALKS 3831 was more effective than PBO, as measured by the PANSS and CGI-S scale, and its antipsychotic efficacy was similar to the active control OLZ. The safety profile of ALKS 3831 was similar toOLZ.Funding Acknowledgements: This study was funded by Alkermes, Inc.

scholarly journals F232. A PHASE 3 STUDY TO DETERMINE THE ANTIPSYCHOTIC EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ALKS 3831 IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH ACUTE EXACERBATION OF SCHIZOPHRENIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S312-S312
Author(s):  
David McDonnell ◽  
Steven G Potkin ◽  
Adam Simmons ◽  
Ying Jiang ◽  
Lauren DiPetrillo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Exacerbation ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Antipsychotic Efficacy

scholarly journals Asenapine for the treatment of adults with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia: results from a randomized, double-blind, fixed-dose, placebo-controlled trial with olanzapine as an active control

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Landbloom ◽  
Mary Mackle ◽  
Xiao Wu ◽  
Linda Kelly ◽  
Linda Snow-Adami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Gain ◽  
Acute Exacerbation ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Text Revision ◽  
Syndrome Scale ◽  
The Difference

ObjectiveEvaluate the efficacy and safety of asenapine 2.5 mg twice daily (bid; n=97) or 5 mg bid (n=113) versus placebo (n=101) in adults with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia.MethodsAdults with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) schizophrenia diagnosis were randomized to asenapine 2.5 mg bid, 5 mg bid, placebo, or olanzapine 15 mg once daily. The primary objective was to test superiority of asenapine versus placebo as measured by the change from baseline to day 42 in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score. The key safety objective was to evaluate weight change in asenapine versus olanzapine at day 42.ResultsThe primary efficacy endpoint was met; the difference in least squares mean change from baseline to day 42 in PANSS total score between asenapine 5 mg bid and placebo was −5.5 points (unadjusted 95% CI: −10.1, −1.0; multiplicity adjusted P=0.0356). Neither asenapine 2.5 mg bid nor olanzapine 15mg were superior to placebo.Both asenapine groups demonstrated significantly less weight gain than olanzapine at day 42. Significantly higher incidences of oral hypoesthesia and dysgeusia (combined) for asenapine 2.5 mg bid (5.2% vs 0.0%; P=0.0217) and 5 mg bid (7.1% vs 0.0%; P=0.0033) were observed versus placebo. There were no significant differences between asenapine and placebo for insomnia, extrapyramidal symptoms, akathisia, dizziness, or combination of somnolence/sedation/hypersomnia.ConclusionThis study supports previous efficacy and safety findings of asenapine; asenapine 5 mg bid is the lowest effective dose in adults with schizophrenia. Asenapine was associated with significantly less weight gain than olanzapine at day 42.

485 Efficacy and Safety of Once- and Twice-Nightly Dosing of Lower-Sodium Oxybate in Adults With Idiopathic Hypersomnia

SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. A191-A192
Author(s):  
Isabelle Arnulf ◽  
Anne Marie Morse ◽  
Patricia Chandler ◽  
Rupa Parvataneni ◽  
Dan Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sodium Oxybate ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Patient Global Impression ◽  
Idiopathic Hypersomnia ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Global Impression Of Change

Abstract Introduction Idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) is a rare central hypersomnolence disorder. In a randomized, controlled study of lower-sodium oxybate (LXB; Xywav™) in adults with IH (NCT03533114), significant differences for LXB compared with placebo were observed in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS; primary efficacy endpoint), self-reported Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIc), and IH Severity Scale (IHSS; key secondary endpoints). In this clinical study, investigators were permitted to initiate LXB dosing on a once-nightly or twice-nightly regimen. Methods Eligible participants aged 18–75 years began LXB treatment, administered once or twice nightly during an open-label treatment/titration and optimization period (OLTTOP; 10–14 weeks); dose amount/regimen could be adjusted during this period. Participants next entered a 2-week, open-label, stable-dose period (SDP), then were randomized to placebo or to continue LXB treatment during a 2-week, double-blind, randomized withdrawal period (DBRWP). P values are nominal for this exploratory analysis. Results Of 154 enrolled participants, 40 (26%) initiated LXB treatment on a once-nightly regimen. In the efficacy population (n=115), 27 participants were on a once-nightly regimen during SDP (48.1% of whom initiated treatment once nightly during OLTTOP) and 88 participants were on a twice-nightly regimen during SDP (86.4% of whom initiated treatment twice nightly during OLTTOP). During SDP, median (min, max) LXB total dose was 4.5 (2.5, 6) g/night (once-nightly group) and 7.5 (4.5, 9) g/night (twice-nightly group). ESS scores worsened in participants randomized to placebo vs those continuing LXB in the once-nightly group (n=11 and n=15, respectively; LS mean difference [95% CI]: −4.93 [−7.41, −2.46]; P=0.0004) and twice-nightly group (n=47 and n=41, respectively; LS mean difference [95% CI]: −7.44 [−9.15, −5.72]; P&lt;0.0001). Worsening was also observed in PGIc (once-nightly: 81.8% [placebo] vs 26.7% [LXB]; P=0.0077; twice-nightly: 89.4% [placebo] vs 19.5% [LXB]; P&lt;0.0001) and IHSS score (estimated median difference [95% CI], once-nightly: −9.00 [−16.0, −3.0]; P=0.0028; twice-nightly: −12.00 [−15.0, −8.0]; P&lt;0.0001). Common adverse events included nausea (21.4%), headache (16.2%), anxiety (14.9%), dizziness (11.7%), insomnia (11.7%), and vomiting (10.4%). Conclusion The efficacy and safety of LXB in IH were demonstrated for both once-nightly and twice-nightly regimens. The majority of participants initiated and remained on a twice-nightly regimen. Support (if any) Jazz Pharmaceuticals

FRESCO-2: A global phase III study of the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS154-TPS154
Author(s):  
Arvind Dasari ◽  
James C. Yao ◽  
Alberto F. Sobrero ◽  
Takayuki Yoshino ◽  
William R. Schelman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
The Us

TPS154 Background: Pts with mCRC have limited treatment options following progression on standard therapies. Current standard of care (SOC) after pts progress on trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) or regorafenib is re-challenge with previous systemic treatments, enrollment in a clinical trial, or best supportive care (BSC). Fruquintinib (Elunate) is a novel, highly selective, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor (VEGFR)-1, -2, and -3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) ( Cancer Biol Ther 2014;15:1635-1645). Fruquintinib is approved in China to treat pts with mCRC who received or are intolerant to fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based chemotherapy, anti-VEGF therapy, and, if RAS wild type, anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy. Approval was based on results of the phase 3 FRESCO study (2013-013-00CH1; NCT02314819; JAMA 2018;319:2486-2496), in which fruquintinib 5 mg daily (QD), 3 weeks on, 1 week off (3 on/1 off), significantly improved overall survival (OS) in pts with mCRC in the 3rd-line+ setting when compared to placebo (median OS 9.3 months [mo] versus 6.6 mo; hazard ratio [HR] 0.65; p < .001). Progression-free survival (PFS) was also superior (median PFS 3.7 mo versus 1.8 mo; HR 0.26; p < .001). The toxicities of fruquintinib were consistent with those of other VEGF TKIs and were manageable. At the time FRESCO was conducted in China, SOC for pts with mCRC differed from that in the US, EU, and Japan. We describe here a global phase 3 study (FRESCO-2; 2019-013-GLOB1; NCT04322539) being conducted to investigate fruquintinib’s efficacy and safety in pts with refractory mCRC and a treatment profile representative of the global SOC. Methods: FRESCO-2 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to compare fruquintinib + BSC to placebo + BSC. Key inclusion criteria are progression on or intolerance to treatment with TAS-102 and/or regorafenib; previous treatment with standard approved therapies including chemotherapy, anti-VEGF therapy, and, if RAS wild type, anti-EGFR therapy. Prior therapy with immune checkpoint or BRAF inhibitors is required for pts with corresponding tumor alterations. Pts (~522) will be randomized 2:1 to receive either fruquintinib 5 mg orally (PO) QD + BSC or placebo 5 mg PO QD + BSC, with a 3 on/1 off schedule. Randomization will be stratified by prior therapy, RAS status, and duration of metastatic disease. The primary endpoint is OS; secondary endpoints include PFS, disease control rate, objective response rate, duration of response, and safety. Final OS analyses will be performed when 364 OS events are observed; futility analysis will be conducted with 1/3 (121) OS events. If enrichment of post-regorafenib pts occurs, enrollment to that strata will be capped at approximately 262. FRESCO-2 will be activated in the US, EU, and Japan; global enrollment is anticipated over 13 mo. Clinical trial information: NCT04322539.

scholarly journals 111 Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study (P301) Assessing Efficacy and Safety of Extended-Release Viloxazine in Children with ADHD

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 272-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azmi Nasser ◽  
Joseph T. Hull ◽  
Fatima A. Chowdhry ◽  
Toyin Adewole ◽  
Tesfaye Liranso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Global Impression ◽  
Extended Release ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
T Score ◽  
Total Average

Abstract:Study Objective:SPN-812 (extended-release viloxazine) is a structurally distinct, bicyclic, Serotonin Norepinephrine Modulating Agent (SNMA) in development as a treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents. This Phase 3, randomized, double-blind study (P301) evaluated the efficacy and safety of once-daily SPN-812 at doses of 100 and 200 mg compared to placebo in children ages 6-11yrs with ADHD.Method:Inclusion criteria required subjects have a confirmed Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5) ADHD diagnosis, ADHD-Rating Scale-5 (ADHD-RS-5) score ≥28, a Clinical Global Impression-Severity score ≥4, and be free of ADHD medication ≥1 week before randomization. This investigation was conducted at 34 study sites in the United States. Subjects (N=477) were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo:100 mg SPN-812:200 mg SPN-812. The 6-week treatment period included up to 1 week of titration and 5 weeks of maintenance (intent-to-treat population: N=460; placebo=155, 100 mg=147, 200 mg=158). The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline (CFB) at end of study (EOS) in ADHD-RS-5 total score. Key secondary endpoints included Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scores at EOS, and CFB at EOS in Conners 3-Parent Short Form (Conners 3-PS) Composite T-score and in Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Version (WFIRS-P) total average score. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), laboratory tests, vital signs, physical exams, electrocardiograms, and the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale.Results:Compared to placebo, a significantly greater improvement in ADHD-RS-5 total score was observed in the 100 mg and 200 mg SPN-812 treatment groups beginning at week 1 (p=0.0004, p=0.0244; respectively) through EOS (p=0.0004, p<0.0001; respectively). Significant improvement at EOS for both 100 mg and 200 mg SPN-812 compared to placebo was also observed in CGI-I score (p=0.0020, p<0.0001; respectively), Connors 3-PS Composite T-score (p=0.0003, p=0.0002; respectively), and in WFIRS-P total average score (p=0.0019, p=0.0002, respectively). The most common (≥5%) treatment-related AEs reported were somnolence, decreased appetite, and headache.Conclusions:In this study, SPN-812 at 100 mg and 200 mg doses met the primary and secondary objectives with statistical significance. AE-related dropouts were ≤5%, indicating SPN-812 treatment was well tolerated.This study is an encore of a poster presentation at the 2019 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP).Funding Acknowledgements:This research was funded by Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Rockville, MD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document