The role of income and neighborhood poverty in the association between the 2009 WIC food package change and child obesity among WIC-participating children in Los Angeles County, 2003-2016

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
M. Pia Chaparro ◽  
Shannon E. Whaley ◽  
Christopher E. Anderson ◽  
May C. Wang ◽  
Catherine M. Crespi

Abstract Objective: To determine whether a previously reported association between the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) food package change and reduced child obesity risk among WIC-participating children in Los Angeles County holds across levels of family income and neighborhood poverty. Design: Analysis of prospectively collected WIC administrative data. The outcome was obesity at age 4 (BMI-for-age≥95th percentile). Poisson regression was applied to a matched sample (N=79,502) to determine if the association between the WIC food package change and child obesity was modified by family income (<50% federal poverty level [FPL], 50-100% FPL, >100% but <185% FPL) and neighborhood poverty. Setting: Los Angeles County, California. Participants: Children who participated in WIC in Los Angeles County between 2003 and 2016; children were grouped as receiving the old WIC food package (2003-2009) or the new WIC food package (2010-2016). Results: Receiving the new WIC food package (i.e. post-2009) was associated with 7-18% lower obesity risk across all family income categories Neither family income nor neighborhood poverty significantly modified the association between the WIC food package and child obesity. However, certain subgroups seemed to benefit more from the food package change than others. In particular, boys from families with income above poverty but residing in the poorest neighborhoods experienced the greatest reductions in obesity risk (RR=0.77; 95%CI=0.66-0.88). Conclusions: The WIC food package revisions were associated with reduced childhood obesity risk among all WIC-participating families in Los Angeles County, across levels of income-eligibility and neighborhood poverty.

2019 ◽  
Vol 109 (5) ◽  
pp. 1414-1421 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Pia Chaparro ◽  
Catherine M Crespi ◽  
Christopher E Anderson ◽  
May C Wang ◽  
Shannon E Whaley

ABSTRACT Background In 2009, for the first time since the program's inception in 1974, the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) changed their food packages, providing food options better aligned with the 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the 2009 WIC food package change was associated with changes in growth trajectories from age 0 to 4 y or obesity at age 4 among children who participated in WIC in Los Angeles County between 2003 and 2016. Methods Children were grouped into 1 of 4 exposure groups: full-dose, new food package group (participating in WIC from birth to age 4, post 2009, N = 70,120), full-dose, old food package group (participating from birth to age 4, pre 2009, N = 85,871), late-dose, new food package group (participating from age 2 to 4 y, post 2009, N = 8386), and late-dose, old food package group (participating from age 2 to 4 y, pre 2009, N = 18,241). Children were matched across groups on gender, race/ethnicity, maternal education and language, family income, and initial weight status, and matched analyses were performed. Longitudinal growth trajectories were modeled using piecewise linear spline mixed models, and differences in obesity at age 4 were compared using Poisson regression models. Results Children receiving a full dose of the new food package had healthier growth trajectories and a lower obesity risk at age 4 than children receiving a full dose of the old food package (RR [95% CI]: 0.88 [0.86, 0.91] for boys, 0.90 [0.87, 0.93] for girls). Boys, but not girls, in the late-dose, new food package group had a lower obesity risk at age 4 compared with boys in the late-dose, old food package group (RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.81, 0.98). Conclusions The WIC food package change appears to be associated with improved childhood obesity outcomes. These findings are important in informing policymakers considering further improvements to the WIC food packages.


2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 1861-1868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivian H. Alfonso ◽  
Ondine von Ehrenstein ◽  
Gretchen Bandoli ◽  
Beate Ritz

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher E. Anderson ◽  
Catherine M. Crespi ◽  
May C. Wang ◽  
Shannon E. Whaley ◽  
M. Pia Chaparro

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 160-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loraine A. Escobedo ◽  
Ashley Crew ◽  
Ariana Eginli ◽  
David Peng ◽  
Michael R. Cousineau ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Simon ◽  
Choiyuk Chiang ◽  
Amy S. Lightstone ◽  
Margaret Shih

2014 ◽  
Vol 104 (S1) ◽  
pp. S112-S118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brent A. Langellier ◽  
M. Pia Chaparro ◽  
May C. Wang ◽  
Maria Koleilat ◽  
Shannon E. Whaley

2001 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
JACK CITRIN ◽  
DAVID O. SEARS ◽  
CHRISTOPHER MUSTE ◽  
CARA WONG

Multiculturalism has emerged to challenge liberalism as an ideological solution in coping with ethnic diversity in the United States. This article develops a definition of political multiculturalism which refers to conceptions of identity, community and public policy. It then analyses the 1994 General Social Survey and a 1994 survey of Los Angeles County to assess the contours of mass support and opposition to multiculturalism, testing hypotheses concerning the role of social background, liberalism–conservatism and racial hostility. The main conclusions are that ‘hard’ versions of multiculturalism are rejected in all ethnic groups, that a liberal political self-identification boosts support for multiculturalism, and that racial hostility is a consistent source of antagonism to the new ethnic agenda of multiculturalism. There is strong similarity in the results in both the national and Los Angeles samples.


2020 ◽  
pp. jech-2019-213574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher E Anderson ◽  
Shannon E Whaley ◽  
Catherine M Crespi ◽  
May C Wang ◽  
M Pia Chaparro

BackgroundResearch has found breastfeeding to be protective of obesity; however, this link remains contentious. We examined longitudinal associations between exclusive breastfeeding duration, growth trajectories and obesity at 4 years among children participating in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC), and whether these associations differed in the context of the 2009 WIC food package change, implemented to improve alignment with dietary guidelines and promote breastfeeding.MethodsLongitudinal data from 260 935 WIC-participating children in Los Angeles County, California, 2003–2016, were used to assess the relationship between duration of receipt of the fully breastfeeding package (an exclusive breastfeeding proxy) with childhood growth and obesity using mixed effects and Poisson regression models.ResultsChildren exclusively breastfed for longer duration had healthier growth trajectories and lower obesity risk at age 4. Compared with infants with no fully breastfeeding package receipt, any receipt (a breastfeeding initiation proxy) was associated with reduced obesity risk. Obesity risk was lowest for boys and girls exclusively breastfed for 7 (risk ratio (RR)=0.73, 95% CI=0.64 to 0.82) and 13 months (RR=0.63, 95% CI=0.58 to 0.69), respectively. Exclusive breastfeeding duration increased, but associations between exclusive breastfeeding duration and growth and obesity were not modified, following the 2009 WIC food package change.ConclusionIncreased duration of exclusive breastfeeding was associated with reduced obesity risk. The greatest incremental benefit was observed going from none to any exclusive breastfeeding, and the maximum cumulative benefit was among children receiving the fully breastfeeding package for more than 6 months. Breastfeeding promotion in WIC remains important for obesity prevention.


2004 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 791-794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce W Furness ◽  
Paul A Simon ◽  
Cheryl M Wold ◽  
Johanna Asarian-Anderson

AbstractObjectives:To assess the prevalence and identify the predictors of food insecurity among households in Los Angeles County with incomes below 300% of the federal poverty level.Methods:The Six-Item Short Form of the US Department of Agriculture's Household Food Security Scale was used as part of a 1999 county-wide, population-based, telephone survey.Results:The prevalence of food insecurity was 24.4% and was inversely associated with household income. Other independent predictors of food insecurity included the presence of children in the household (odds ratio (OR) 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2–2.3) and a history of homelessness in the past five years (OR 5.6, 95% CI 3.4–9.4).Conclusion:Food insecurity is a significant public health problem among low–income households in Los Angeles County. Food assistance programmes should focus efforts on households living in and near poverty, those with children, and those with a history of homelessness.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document