Weakly-injective modules over hereditary noetherian prime rings

1995 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 287-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Jain ◽  
S. R. López-Permouth
Keyword(s):  
Simple Module ◽  
Injective Module ◽  
Injective Hull ◽  
Prime Rings ◽  
Direct Sum ◽  
Injective Modules ◽  
Hereditary Noetherian Prime Ring ◽  
Free Modules ◽  
Torsion Modules ◽  
Torsion Free

AbstractA module M is said to be wealdy-injective if and only if for every finitely generated submodule N of the injective hull E(M) of M there exists a submodule X of E(M), isomorphic to M such that N ⊂ X. In this paper we investigate weakly-injective modules over bounded hereditary noetherian prime rings. In particular we show that torsion-free modules over bounded hnp rings are always wealdy-injective, while torsion modules with finite Goldie dimension are weakly-injective only if they are injective.As an application, we show that weakly-injective modules over bounded Dedekind prime rings have a decomposition as a direct sum of an injective module B, and a module C satisfying that if a simple module S is embeddable in C then the (external) direct sum of all proper submodules of the injective hull of S is also embeddable in C. Indeed, we show that over a bounded hereditary noetherian prime ring every uniform module has periodicity one if and only if every weakly-injective module has such a decomposition.

scholarly journals On injectiveL-modules

2005 ◽  
Vol 2005 (5) ◽  
pp. 747-754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Isaac
Keyword(s):  
Exact Sequence ◽  
Short Exact Sequence ◽  
Injective Module ◽  
Projective Modules ◽  
Module Theory ◽  
Direct Sum ◽  
Injective Modules ◽  
Free Modules

The concepts of free modules, projective modules, injective modules, and the like form an important area in module theory. The notion of free fuzzy modules was introduced by Muganda as an extension of free modules in the fuzzy context. Zahedi and Ameri introduced the concept of projective and injectiveL-modules. In this paper, we give an alternate definition for injectiveL-modules and prove that a direct sum ofL-modules is injective if and only if eachL-module in the sum is injective. Also we prove that ifJis an injective module andμis an injectiveL-submodule ofJ, and if0→μ→fv→gη→0is a short exact sequence ofL-modules, thenν≃μ⊕η.

Injective modules over Mori domains

2003 ◽  
Vol 40 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 33-40
Author(s):  
L. Fuchs
Keyword(s):  
Injective Module ◽  
The Other ◽  
Injective Hull ◽  
Maximum Condition ◽  
Direct Sum ◽  
Injective Modules ◽  
Special Case ◽  
False Claim

Injective modules are considered over commutative domains. It is shown that every injective module admits a decomposition into two summands, where one of the summands contains an essential submodule whose elements have divisorial annihilator ideals, while the other summand contains no element with divisorial annihilator. In the special case of Mori domains (i.e., the divisorial ideals satisfy the maximum condition), the first summand is a direct sum of a S-injective module and a module that has no such summand. The former is a direct sum of indecomposable injectives, while the latter is the injective hull of such a direct sum. Those Mori domains R are characterized for which the injective hull of Q/R is S-injective (Q denotes the field of quotients of R) as strong Mori domains, correcting a false claim in the literature.

Injective Hulls of Torsion Free Modules

1971 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 1094-1101 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Zelmanowitz
Keyword(s):  
Nonzero Element ◽  
Injective Hull ◽  
Direct Products ◽  
Finitely Generated ◽  
Basic Theorem ◽  
Direct Sum ◽  
Free Modules ◽  
Injective Hulls ◽  
First Time ◽  
Torsion Free

In § 1, we begin with a basic theorem which describes a convenient embedding of a nonsingular left R-module into a complete direct product of copies of the left injective hull of R (Theorem 2). Several applications follow immediately. Notably, the injective hull of a finitely generated nonsingular left R-module is isomorphic to a direct sum of injective hulls of closed left ideals of R (Corollary 4). In particular, when R is left self-injective, every finitely generated nonsingular left R-module is isomorphic to a finite direct sum of injective left ideals (Corollary 6).In § 2, where it is assumed for the first time that rings have identity elements, we investigate more generally the class of left R-modules which are embeddable in direct products of copies of the left injective hull Q of R. Such modules are called torsion free, and can also be characterized by the property that no nonzero element is annihilated by a dense left ideal of R (Proposition 12).

scholarly journals Relative injectivity and CS-modules

1994 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 661-666
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Ahmed Kamal
Keyword(s):  
Direct Decomposition ◽  
Injective Hull ◽  
Extra Condition ◽  
Direct Sums ◽  
Direct Sum ◽  
Injective Modules ◽  
Semisimple Module ◽  
Continuous Module

In this paper we show that a direct decomposition of modulesM⊕N, withNhomologically independent to the injective hull ofM, is a CS-module if and only ifNis injective relative toMand both ofMandNare CS-modules. As an application, we prove that a direct sum of a non-singular semisimple module and a quasi-continuous module with zero socle is quasi-continuous. This result is known for quasi-injective modules. But when we confine ourselves to CS-modules we need no conditions on their socles. Then we investigate direct sums of CS-modules which are pairwise relatively inective. We show that every finite direct sum of such modules is a CS-module. This result is known for quasi-continuous modules. For the case of infinite direct sums, one has to add an extra condition. Finally, we briefly discuss modules in which every two direct summands are relatively inective.

scholarly journals Injective Modules Over Non-Artinian Serial Rings

1988 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 242-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Hill
Keyword(s):  
Affirmative Answer ◽  
Primitive Idempotent ◽  
Injective Hull ◽  
Finitely Generated ◽  
Serial Ring ◽  
Direct Sum ◽  
Injective Modules

AbstractA module is uniserial if its lattice of submodules is linearly ordered, and a ring R is left serial if R is a direct sum of uniserial left ideals. The following problem is considered. Suppose the injective hull of each simple left R-module is uniserial. When does this imply that the indecomposable injective left R-modules are uniserial? An affirmative answer is known when R is commutative and when R is Artinian. The following result is proved.Let R be a left serial ring and suppose that for each primitive idempotent e, eRe has indecomposable injective left modules uniserial. The following conditions are equivalent. (a) The injective hull of each simple left R-module is uniserial. (b) Every indecomposable injective left R-module is univerial. (c) Every finitely generated left R-module is serial.The rest of the paper is devoted to a study of some non-Artinian serial rings which serve to illustrate this theorem.

scholarly journals Rings all of whose torsion quasi-injective modules are injective

1984 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Ahsan ◽  
E. Enochs
Keyword(s):  
Jacobson Radical ◽  
Identity Element ◽  
Torsion Theory ◽  
Injective Hull ◽  
Torsion Class ◽  
Injective Modules ◽  
Torsion Theories ◽  
Torsion Free

Throughout this paper it is assumed that rings are associative, have the identity element, and all modules are left unital. R will denote a ring with identity, R-Mod the category of left R-modules, and for each left R-module M, E(M) (resp. J(M)) will represent the injective hull (resp. Jacobson radical) of M. Also, for a module M, A ⊆' M will mean that A is an essential submodule of M, and Z(M) denotes the singular submodule of M. M is called singular if Z(M) = M, and it is called non-singular in case Z(M) = 0. For fundamental definitions and results related to torsion theories, we refer to [12] and [14]. In this paper we shall deal mainly with Goldie torsion theory. Recall that a pair (G, F) of classes of left R-modules is known as Goldie torsion theory if G is the smallest torsion class containing all modules B/A, where A ⊆' B, and the torsion free class F is precisely the class of non-singular modules.

scholarly journals Proper classes generated by τ- closed submodules

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 83-95
Author(s):  
Yılmaz Durğun ◽  
Ayşe Çobankaya
Keyword(s):  
Proper Class ◽  
Closed Submodules ◽  
Free Modules ◽  
Torsion Modules ◽  
Exact Sequences ◽  
Torsion Free

AbstractThe main object of this paper is to study relative homological aspects as well as further properties of τ -closed submodules. A submodule N of a module M is said to be τ -closed (or τ -pure) provided that M/N is τ -torsion-free, where τ stands for an idempotent radical. Whereas the well-known proper class 𝒞losed (𝒫ure) of closed (pure) short exact sequences, the class τ −𝒞losed of τ -closed short exact sequences need not be a proper class. We describe the smallest proper class 〈τ − 𝒞losed〉 containing τ − 𝒞losed, through τ -closed submodules. We show that the smallest proper class 〈τ − 𝒞losed〉 is the proper classes projectively generated by the class of τ -torsion modules and coprojectively generated by the class of τ -torsion-free modules. Also, we consider the relations between the proper class 〈τ − 𝒞losed〉 and some of well-known proper classes, such as 𝒞losed, 𝒫ure.

scholarly journals On τ-completely decomposable modules

2004 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Septimiu Crivei
Keyword(s):  
Direct Summand ◽  
Noetherian Ring ◽  
Torsion Theory ◽  
Positive Answer ◽  
Essential Extension ◽  
Injective Module ◽  
Injective Hull ◽  
Commutative Noetherian Ring ◽  
Direct Sum ◽  
Torsion Theories

For a hereditary torsion theory τ, a moduleAis called τ-completedly decomposable if it is a direct sum of modules that are the τ-injective hull of each of their non-zero submodules. We give a positive answer in several cases to the following generalised Matlis' problem: Is every direct summand of a τ-completely decomposable module still τ-completely decomposable? Secondly, for a commutative Noetherian ringRthat is not a domain, we determine those torsion theories with the property that every τ-injective module is an essential extension of a (τ-injective) τ-completely decomposable module.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document