Where do our patients die? A review of the place of death of cancer patients in Cape Town, South Africa

2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clare Manicom
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Cape Town ◽  
Acute Care Hospital ◽  
Community Support ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Place Of Death ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Oncology Unit ◽  
At Home

AbstractObjective: A 3-year review of the place of death of patients from a private oncology unit in Cape Town explores the length of time patients spent in acute care hospital beds, under the oncologist's care, prior to their death. Implications for improved staff training, patient support, and family education are identified.Method: This is an exploratory quantitative study that captures details of place of death and particulars of length of acute care hospital stay for cancer patients of a private oncology unit. Data was gathered from 424 patient files, from January 2006 to December 2008, and is interpreted using simple descriptive statistics.Results: Of the 424 recorded deaths, the average age at death was 66.09 years, with lung and bronchial cancer accounting for the leading diagnosis at death (23.82%). Most of patient deaths recorded (42.92%) occurred at home, with death under the oncologist's care in an acute medical ward comprising the second largest category (34.20%). The majority of the patients who died in this ward (38%) died within 3 days of admission.Significance of results: Although medical and community support for end-of-life care at home are not uniformly available to all South Africans, the patients and families in this study had good access to hospice care, and achieved a higher “death at home” rate than that seen in several more developed countries. The review of place of death and length of hospitalization prior to death highlights the need for staff at private oncology units to be trained in and comfortable with palliative care. Attention is also drawn to the very real needs of carers and family members of patients, if death is planned to occur in the patient's home.

scholarly journals Can This Patient Be Discharged Home? Factors Associated With At-Home Death Among Patients With Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 1159-1167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Alonso-Babarro ◽  
Eduardo Bruera ◽  
María Varela-Cerdeira ◽  
María Jesús Boya-Cristia ◽  
Rosario Madero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Perceived Social Support ◽  
Acute Care Hospital ◽  
Place Of Death ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Home Death ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Decision Making Model ◽  
At Home

Purpose The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with at-home death among patients with advanced cancer and create a decision-making model for discharging patients from an acute-care hospital. Patients and Methods We conducted an observational cohort study to identify the association between place of death and the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with advanced cancer who received care from a palliative home care team (PHCT) and of their primary caregivers. We used logistic regression analysis to identify the predictors of at-home death. Results We identified 380 patients who met the study inclusion criteria; of these, 245 patients (64%) died at home, 72 (19%) died in an acute-care hospital, 60 (16%) died in a palliative care unit, and three (1%) died in a nursing home. Median follow-up was 48 days. We included the 16 variables that were significant in univariate analysis in our decision-making model. Five variables predictive of at-home death were retained in the multivariate analysis: caregiver's preferred place of death, patients' preferred place of death, caregiver's perceived social support, number of hospital admission days, and number of PHCT visits. A subsequent reduced model including only those variables that were known at the time of discharge (caregivers' preferred place of death, patients' preferred place of death, and caregivers' perceived social support) had a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 81% in predicting place of death. Conclusion Asking a few simple patient- and family-centered questions may help to inform the decision regarding the best place for end-of-life care and death.

Pediatric End-of-Life Care for Taiwanese Children Who Died As a Result of Cancer From 2001 Through 2006

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 890-894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siew Tzuh Tang ◽  
Yen-Ni Hung ◽  
Tsang-Wu Liu ◽  
Dong-Tsamn Lin ◽  
Yueh-Chih Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Pediatric Cancer ◽  
Hospice Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospital ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Pediatric Cancer Patients ◽  
Eol Care ◽  
To Receive

Purpose Patterns of aggressive end-of-life (EOL) care have not been extensively explored in a pediatric cancer population, especially outside Western countries. The purpose of this population-based study was to examine trends in aggressive pediatric EOL cancer care in Taiwan. Methods Retrospective cohort study that used administrative data among 1,208 pediatric cancer decedents from 2001 through 2006. Results Taiwanese pediatric cancer patients who died in 2001 through 2006 received aggressive EOL care. The majority of these patients in their last month of life continued to receive chemotherapy (52.5%), used intensive care (57.0%), underwent intubation (40.9%), underwent mechanical ventilation (48.2%), or spent greater than 14 days (69.5%) in hospital, and they died in an acute care hospital (78.8%). Of these pediatric cancer patients, one in four received cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the month before they died, and only 7.2% received hospice care. Among those who received hospice care, 21.8% started such care within the last 3 days of life. This pattern of aggressive EOL care did not change over the study period except for significantly decreased intubation in the last month of life. Conclusion Continued chemotherapy and heavy use of life-sustaining treatments in the last month of life coupled with lack of hospice care to support Taiwanese pediatric cancer patients dying at home may lead to multiple unplanned health care encounters, prolonged hospitalization at EOL, and eventual death in an acute care hospital for the majority of these patients. Future research should design interventions that enable Taiwanese pediatric cancer patients to receive EOL care that best meets the individual or the parental needs and preferences.

scholarly journals Socioeconomy as a prognostic factor for location of death in Swedish palliative cancer patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Nilsson ◽  
Georg Holgersson ◽  
Gustav Ullenhag ◽  
Malin Holmgren ◽  
Bertil Axelsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Community Support ◽  
Place Of Death ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Home Death ◽  
Location Of Death ◽  
Community Support Services ◽  
Dying At Home ◽  
At Home

Abstract Background An important aspect of end-of-life care is the place of death. A majority of cancer patients prefer home death to hospital death. At the same time, the actual location of death is often against patient’s last-known wish. The aim of this study was to analyze whether socioeconomic factors influence if Swedish palliative cancer patients die at home or at a hospital. There is no previous study on location of death encompassing several years in Swedish cancer patients. Methods Data was collected from the Swedish Register of Palliative Care for patients diagnosed with brain tumor, lung, colorectal, prostate or breast cancer recorded between 2011 and 2014. The data was linked to the Swedish Cancer Register, the Cause of Death Register and the Longitudinal Integration Database for health-insurance and labor-market studies. A total of 8990 patients were included. Results We found that marital status was the factor that seemed to affect the place of death. Lack of a partner, compared to being married, was associated with a higher likelihood of dying at a hospital. Conclusion Our findings are in line with similar earlier studies encompassing only 1 year and based on patients in other countries. Whether inequalities at least partly explain the differences remains to be investigated. Patients dying of cancer in Sweden, who do not have a life partner, may not have the option of dying at home due to lack of informal support. Perhaps the need of extensive community support services to enable home death have to improve, and further studies are warranted to answer this question.

Unmet supportive needs of cancer patients in an acute care hospital in Japan—a census study

2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 1393-1403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisuke Fujisawa ◽  
Sunre Park ◽  
Rieko Kimura ◽  
Ikuko Suyama ◽  
Yurie Koyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospital ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Supportive Needs

scholarly journals Interventions to Promote Early Discharge and Avoid Inappropriate Hospital (Re)Admission: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (14) ◽  
pp. 2457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Coffey ◽  
Leahy-Warren ◽  
Savage ◽  
Hegarty ◽  
Cornally ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Discharge Planning ◽  
Acute Care Hospital ◽  
Early Discharge ◽  
Community Services ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Term Care ◽  
At Home

Increasing pressure on limited healthcare resources has necessitated the development of measures promoting early discharge and avoiding inappropriate hospital (re)admission. This systematic review examines the evidence for interventions in acute hospitals including (i) hospital-patient discharge to home, community services or other settings, (ii) hospital discharge to another care setting, and (iii) reduction or prevention of inappropriate hospital (re)admissions. Academic electronic databases were searched from 2005 to 2018. In total, ninety-four eligible papers were included. Interventions were categorized into: (1) pre-discharge exclusively delivered in the acute care hospital, (2) pre- and post-discharge delivered by acute care hospital, (3) post-discharge delivered at home and (4) delivered only in a post-acute facility. Mixed results were found regarding the effectiveness of many types of interventions. Interventions exclusively delivered in the acute hospital pre-discharge and those involving education were most common but their effectiveness was limited in avoiding (re)admission. Successful pre- and post-discharge interventions focused on multidisciplinary approaches. Post-discharge interventions exclusively delivered at home reduced hospital stay and contributed to patient satisfaction. Existing systematic reviews on tele-health and long-term care interventions suggest insufficient evidence for admission avoidance. The most effective interventions to avoid inappropriate re-admission to hospital and promote early discharge included integrated systems between hospital and the community care, multidisciplinary service provision, individualization of services, discharge planning initiated in hospital and specialist follow-up.

scholarly journals Comparative Effectiveness of Long-Term Acute Care Hospital versus Skilled Nursing Facility Transfer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anil Makam ◽  
Oanh Kieu Nguyen ◽  
Michael E. Miller ◽  
Sachin J Shah ◽  
Kandice A. Kapinos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Inpatient Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospital ◽  
Healthcare Spending ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Skilled Nursing ◽  
Medicare Claims ◽  
One Year ◽  
At Home

Abstract BACKGROUND: Long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) use varies considerably across the U.S., which may reflect uncertainty about the effectiveness of LTACHs vs. skilled nursing facilities (SNF), the principal post-acute care alternative. Given that LTACHs receive over triple the reimbursement of SNFs for comparable diagnoses, we sought to compare outcomes and spending between LTACH versus SNF transfer. METHODS: Using Medicare claims linked to electronic health record (EHR) data from six Texas Hospitals between 2009-2010, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized on a medicine service in a high-LTACH use region and discharged to either an LTACH or SNF and followed for one year. The primary outcomes included mortality, 60-day recovery without inpatient care, days at home, and healthcare spending.RESULTS: Of 3,503 patients, 18% were transferred to an LTACH. Patients transferred to LTACHs were younger (median 71 vs. 82 years), less likely to be female (50.5 vs 66.6%) and white (69.0 vs. 84.1%), but were sicker (24.3 vs. 14.2% for prolonged intensive care unit stay; median diagnosis resource intensity weight of 2.03 vs. 1.38). In unadjusted analyses, patients transferred to an LTACH vs. SNF were less likely to survive (59.1 vs. 65.0%) or recover (62.5 vs 66.0%), and spent fewer days at home (186 vs. 200). Adjusting for demographic and clinical confounders available in Medicare claims and EHR data, LTACH transfer was not significantly associated with differences in mortality (HR, 1.12, 95% CI, 0.94-1.33), recovery (SHR, 1.07, 0.93-1.23), and days spent at home (IRR, 0.96, 0.83-1.10), but was associated with greater Medicare spending ($16,689 for one year, 95% CI, $12,216-$21,162).CONCLUSION: LTACH transfer for Medicare beneficiaries is associated with similar clinical outcomes but with higher healthcare spending compared to SNF transfer. LTACH use should be reserved for patients who require complex inpatient care and cannot be cared for in SNFs.

scholarly journals Comparative effectiveness of long-term acute care hospital versus skilled nursing facility transfer

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anil N. Makam ◽  
Oanh Kieu Nguyen ◽  
Michael E. Miller ◽  
Sachin J. Shah ◽  
Kandice A. Kapinos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Inpatient Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospital ◽  
Healthcare Spending ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Skilled Nursing ◽  
One Year ◽  
At Home

Abstract Background Long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) use varies considerably across the U.S., which may reflect uncertainty about the effectiveness of LTACHs vs. skilled nursing facilities (SNF), the principal post-acute care alternative. Given that LTACHs provide more intensive care and thus receive over triple the reimbursement of SNFs for comparable diagnoses, we sought to compare outcomes and spending between LTACH versus SNF transfer. Methods Using Medicare claims linked to electronic health record (EHR) data from six Texas Hospitals between 2009 and 2010, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized on a medicine service in a high-LTACH use region and discharged to either an LTACH or SNF and followed for one year. The primary outcomes included mortality, 60-day recovery without inpatient care, days at home, and healthcare spending Results Of 3503 patients, 18% were transferred to an LTACH. Patients transferred to LTACHs were younger (median 71 vs. 82 years), less likely to be female (50.5 vs 66.6%) and white (69.0 vs. 84.1%), but were sicker (24.3 vs. 14.2% for prolonged intensive care unit stay; median diagnosis resource intensity weight of 2.03 vs. 1.38). In unadjusted analyses, patients transferred to an LTACH vs. SNF were less likely to survive (59.1 vs. 65.0%) or recover (62.5 vs 66.0%), and spent fewer days at home (186 vs. 200). Adjusting for demographic and clinical confounders available in Medicare claims and EHR data, LTACH transfer was not significantly associated with differences in mortality (HR, 1.12, 95% CI, 0.94–1.33), recovery (SHR, 1.07, 0.93–1.23), and days spent at home (IRR, 0.96, 0.83–1.10), but was associated with greater Medicare spending ($16,689 for one year, 95% CI, $12,216–$21,162). Conclusion LTACH transfer for Medicare beneficiaries is associated with similar clinical outcomes but with higher healthcare spending compared to SNF transfer. LTACH use should be reserved for patients who require complex inpatient care and cannot be cared for in SNFs.

scholarly journals Acute-Care Hospital Use Patterns Near End-of-Life for Cancer Patients Who Die in Hospital in Canada

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 109s-109s
Author(s):  
J. Tung ◽  
K. Decaria ◽  
D. Dudgeon ◽  
E. Green ◽  
R. Shaw Moxam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospital ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Life Care

Background: Acute-care hospitals have a role in managing the needs of people with cancer when they are at the end-of-life; however, overutilization of hospital care at the end-of-life results in poorer quality of life and can worsen the patient's experience. Early integration of comprehensive palliative care can greatly reduce unplanned visits to the emergency department, reduce avoidable admissions to hospital, shorten hospital stays, and increase the number of home deaths as well as improve the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer. Aim: To describe the current landscape of acute-care hospital utilization near the end-of-life across Canada and indirectly examine access to palliative care in cancer patients who die in hospital. Methods: Data were obtained from the Canadian Institute for Health Information. The analysis was restricted to adults aged 18+ who died in an acute care hospital in 2014/15 and 2015/16 for nine provinces and three territories. The Discharge Abstract Database was used to extract acute-care cancer death abstracts. Data on intensive care unit (ICU) admissions includes only facilities that report ICU data. Results: Acute care utilization at end-of-life remains commonplace. In Canada (excluding Québec), 43% (48,987) of deaths from cancer occurred in acute-care hospitals, with 70% admitted through the emergency department (ED). In the last six months of life, cancer patients dying in hospital had a median cumulative length of stay ranging from 17 to 25 days, depending on the province. Between 18.1% and 32.8% of patients experienced two or more admissions to the hospital in the last month of life. The proportion of cancer patients admitted to the ICU in the last 14 days of life ranged from 6.4% to 15.1%. Patient demographics (age, sex, place of residence) and clinical factors (cancer type) were often predictors of hospital utilization at end-of-life and likely point to inequities in access to palliative and end-of-life care. Conclusion: Despite previous patient surveys indicating that patients would prefer to receive care and spend their finals days at home or in a hospice, there appears to be overuse of and overreliance on acute care hospital services near the end-of-life in Canada. The high rates of hospital deaths and admissions through the ED at the end-of-life for cancer patients may signal a lack of planning for impeding death and inadequate availability of or access to community- and home-based palliative and end-of-life care services. Acute care hospitals may have a role in managing the health care needs of people affected by cancer; however, end-of-life care should be an option in other settings that align with patient preferences. Standards or practice guidelines to identify, assess and refer patients to palliative care services earlier in their cancer journey should be developed and implemented to ensure optimal quality of life.

Measuring palliative and end-of-life care for cancer patients who die in hospital in Canada.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 58-58
Author(s):  
Kristen Decaria ◽  
Deborah Dudgeon ◽  
Esther Green ◽  
Raquel Shaw Moxam ◽  
Rami Rahal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospital ◽  
Hospital Utilization ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Life Care

58 Background: High acute hospital utilization rates near end-of-life can signal that community-based palliative care may not be suiting patients’ needs. Early integration of comprehensive palliative care can greatly reduce unplanned visits to the emergency department, reduce multiple admissions to hospital, shorten hospital stays, and increase the number of home deaths as well as improving the quality of life of advanced cancer patients. This analysis reports on indicators that describe the current landscape of acute-care hospital utilization at end-of-life and indirectly examines access to palliative care in patients who died of cancer in a hospital. Methods: Data were provided by the Canadian Institute for Health Information. The Discharge Abstract Database was used to extract acute-care cancer death abstracts. Data on ICU admissions include only facilities that report ICU data. Emergency department visit data were obtained from the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System. The analysis was restricted to adults aged 18+ who died in an acute-care hospital in fiscal years 2014/15 and 2015/16 for nine provinces and three territories. Results: A total of 48,987 (43%) cancer patient deaths occurred in an acute-care hospitals, with 70% admitted through the emergency department. Preliminary analysis revealed interprovincial variation in the cumulative length of stay in hospital 6 months prior to death from a median stay of 17 to 25 days. Some variation was also seen in the proportion of patients admitted to hospital two or more times in the last month of life (ranging from 18% to 33%), and the proportion of cancer patients admitted to ICU in the last 14 days of life (ranging from 15% to 6%). Patient demographics (age, sex, place of residence) and clinical factors (cancer type) were often predictors of hospital utilization at end-of-life. Conclusions: This study provides information on the current landscape of acute-care hospital utilization by cancer patients at end-of-life across Canada and identifies interprovincial variations in management of end-of-life care. An area of focus for the Palliative and End-of-Life National Network continue to be developing nationally agreed upon system-wide palliative care indicators.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document