Diverse perennial crop mixtures sustain higher productivity over time based on ecological complementarity

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 317-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentín D. Picasso ◽  
E. Charles Brummer ◽  
Matt Liebman ◽  
Philip M. Dixon ◽  
Brian J. Wilsey

AbstractCropping systems that rely on renewable energy and resources and are based on ecological principles could be more stable and productive into the future than current monoculture systems with serious unintended environmental consequences such as soil erosion and water pollution. In nonagricultural systems, communities with higher species diversity have higher productivity and provide other ecosystem services. However, communities of well-adapted crop species selected for biomass production may respond differently to increasing diversity. Diversity effects may be due to complementarity among species (complementary resource use and facilitative interactions) or positive selection effects (e.g., species with higher productivity dominate the mixture), and these effects may change over time or across environments. Our goal was to identify the ecological mechanisms causing diversity effects in a biodiversity experiment using agriculturally relevant species, and evaluate the implications for the design of sustainable cropping systems. We seeded seven perennial forage species in a replicated field experiment at two locations in Iowa, USA, and evaluated biomass productivity of monocultures and two- to six-species mixtures over 3 years after the establishment year under management systems of contrasting intensity: one or three harvests per year. Productivity increased with seeded species richness in all environments, and the positive relationship did not change over time. Polyculture overyielding was due to complementarity among species in the community rather than to selection effects of individual species. Complementarity increased as a log-linear function of species richness in all environments, and this trend was consistent across years. Legume–grass facilitation may explain much of this complementarity effect. Although individual species with high biomass production had a major effect on productivity of mixtures, the species producing the highest biomass in monoculture changed over the years in most environments. Furthermore, transgressive overyielding was observed and was more prevalent in later years, in some environments. We conclude that choosing a single well-adapted species for maximizing productivity may not be the best alternative over the long term and that high levels of species diversity should be included in the design of productive and ecologically sound agricultural systems.

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liangjun HU ◽  
Qinfeng GUO

How species diversity relates to productivity remains a major debate. To date, however, the underlying mechanisms that regulate the ecological processes involved are still poorly understood. Three major issues persist in early efforts at resolution. First, in the context that productivity drives species diversity, how the pathways operate is poorly-explained. Second, productivity  per se varies with community or ecosystem maturity. If diversity indeed drives productivity, the criterion of choosing appropriate measures for productivity is not available. Third, spatial scaling suggests that sampling based on small-plots may not be suitable for formulating species richness-productivity relationships (SRPRs). Thus, the long-standing assumption simply linking diversity with productivity and pursuing a generalizing pattern may not be robust. We argue that productivity, though defined as ‘the rate of biomass production’, has been measured in two ways environmental surrogates and biomass production leading to misinterpretations and difficulty in the pursuit of generalizable SRPRs. To tackle these issues, we developed an integrative theoretical paradigm encompassing richer biological and physical contexts and clearly reconciling the major processes of the systems, using proper productivity measures and sampling units. We conclude that loose interpretation and confounding measures of productivity may be the real root of current SRPR inconsistencies and debate.


2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Ambili ◽  
George V. Thomas ◽  
Murali Gopal Alka Gupta

<p>Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) species diversity and extent of association were investigated in arecanut based cropping systems<br />differing in crop combinations. The study was carried out in farmers’ fields under acidic soil conditions at three locations representing<br />low land (Maneikkara), midland (Cheruvanjeri) and high land (Nedumpoyil) regions of Kannur district in Kerala. The cropping<br />systems in Maneikkara, Cheruvanjeri and Nedumpoyil had arecanut-banana, arecanut-banana-black pepper and arecanut-bananablack<br />pepper-cardamom as component crops. AM spore load and root colonization differed significantly in arecanut in the three<br />cropping systems. Highest spore load was recorded in Maneikkara followed by that in Nedumpoyil and Cheruvanjeri regions.<br />Crops which formed components of the cropping system differed in root colonization levels, with banana recording the highest<br />level, followed by arecanut, black pepper and cardamom. Colonization pattern was Paris type in all crops, but varied with respect<br />to predominance of arbuscules in arecanut and vesicles in banana. Arecanut-black pepper-banana system at Cheruvanjeri in<br />midland was superior with respect to species diversity and species richness as evidenced by Shannon–Weiner index (Hs), Simpson’s<br />index of diversity (Ds) and species richness index. Arecanut-banana cropping system in Maneikkara in low land had low level of<br />species diversity and species richness, indicating the combined influence of crop combinations and soil factors such as N and P on<br />AM diversity and distribution. Rhizophagus fasciculatus, Funneliformis geosporum, F. mosseae, Glomus macrocarpum,<br />G. aggregatum, G. multicaule, G. glomerulatum and Acaulospora bireticulata were the AMF species identified from the arecanut<br />cropping systems. F. geosporum was the most abundant (29-50%) species in the cropping system. The relative occurrence and<br />abundance of AM species varied significantly with respect to the crops and locations.</p>


Weed Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Connor L. Hodgskiss ◽  
Travis R. Legleiter ◽  
Bryan G. Young ◽  
William G. Johnson

Abstract The addition of dicamba as a weed control option in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is a valuable tool. However, this technology must be utilized with other herbicide sites of action (SOAs) to reduce selection pressure on weed communities and ensure its prolonged usefulness. A long-term trial was conducted for 7 yr in Indiana to evaluate weed community densities and species richness with four levels of dicamba selection pressure in a corn (Zea mays L.)–soybean rotation. Monocot densities and richness increased over time in the dicamba-reliant treatment. Dicot densities in the dicamba-reliant treatment declined over time, but dicot richness increased. The soil weed seedbank was affected by the varying herbicide strategies. The dicamba-reliant strategy had greater than 43% higher total weed density than all other treatments, primarily due to having a monocot density that was at least 71% higher than the other treatments. The fully diversified strategy with eight SOAs and residual herbicides used every year had the lowest total weed species richness in the soil seedbank, which supported the in-field observations.


GCB Bioenergy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 1000-1014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey P. Morris ◽  
Zhenbin Hu ◽  
Paul P. Grabowski ◽  
Justin O. Borevitz ◽  
Marie-Anne de Graaff ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Garbarini ◽  
Hung-Bin Sheu ◽  
Dana Weber

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam Nordberg ◽  
Louis G. Castonguay ◽  
Benjamin Locke

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document