Czechoslovak Tariffs in the 1920s: An Example of Historical Specificity in Economic Policy

Slavic Review ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 523-543
Author(s):  
Oldřich Krpec ◽  
Vít Hloušek

Czechoslovakia was the first industrialized economy to substantially increase tariffs after the First World War. At that time, Czechoslovakia was highly export-oriented, with a large trade surplus in industrial goods. We argue that the introduction of tariffs was a consequence of the ethnically heterogeneous structure of the economy. German capital controlled the highly export-oriented light and consumer goods industries; Czech capital dominated in industries that were far less export-oriented or even import-competing, such as machinery, transportation equipment, and electrical goods. Trade and exchange-rate policy preferences of both groups clearly differed; however, the policy decision-making process (at least until 1926) was completely controlled by Czechoslovaks and Czech capital, explicitly committed to a nationalist takeover of Czechoslovakia's economy. This is why it was possible to implement an exchange rate and trade policy that ran contrary to theoretical expectations based on the general (national aggregate) indicators of the national economy.

1979 ◽  
Vol 90 ◽  
pp. 77-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.L. Major

The National Institute has launched a series of conferences on important issues of economic policy. The conference papers and accounts of the conference discussions are being published by Heinemann Educational Books. The first two books in the series, entitled Demand Management and De-industrialisation, were the outcome of conferences held in December 1977 and June 1978 respectively. The third book, of which this article gives a brief summary under the same title, appeared this month, following a conference in June 1979. The purpose of the conference was to provide a forum for discussion of the trade and exchange-rate policies which the United Kingdom should pursue domestically and advocate in the international arena, and the choice of topics reflects the attention recently devoted there to non-tariff barriers to trade, general economic relations between North and South, the European Monetary System, and its differing implications for debtor and creditor countries. Future studies will be conducted under the joint sponsorship of the National Institute, the Policy Studies Institute and the Royal Institute of International Affairs. The first under the new arrangement will take place next month, with ‘Britain in Europe’ as its theme. The series has been started with financial support from the Nuffield Foundation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 156 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erhan Uluceviz ◽  
Kamil Yilmaz

AbstractWe study macro-financial linkages and their importance within the Swiss economy from a network perspective. First, we investigate the real-financial connectedness in the Swiss economy, using the KOF economic barometer, obtained from real and financial variables, and, the real activity index (RAI), we distilled from a small set of real variables, as two alternative proxies for the real side. Whereas the KOF-barometer-based analysis shows that both sides transmit sizeable shocks to each other without one dominating the other, the RAI-based analysis shows that in the aggregate, the financial side turns out to be the net shock transmitter to the real sector. In the second part, we focus on the relative importance of financial markets as shock propagators using a network centrality measure. We find that 2008–2009 recession in Switzerland and the Swiss National Bank’s (SNB) exchange rate policy changes in 2011 and 2015 have significantly altered the way the shocks are transmitted across the two sides of the economy. During 2009–2011, stock, bond, and foreign exchange (FX) markets, in descending order, played important roles as shock propagators. Following the SNB’s 2015 policy decision to discontinue the lower bound for the EUR/CHF exchange rate, FX market has become equally important as the stock market but more important than the bond market as a shock propagator.


1980 ◽  
Vol 90 (359) ◽  
pp. 643 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. H. McNicoll ◽  
Robin Major

2004 ◽  
pp. 112-122
Author(s):  
O. Osipova

After the financial crisis at the end of the 1990 s many countries rejected fixed exchange rate policy. However actually they failed to proceed to announced "independent float" exchange rate arrangement. This might be due to the "fear of floating" or an irreversible result of inflation targeting central bank policy. In the article advantages and drawbacks of fixed and floating exchange rate arrangements are systematized. Features of new returning to exchange rates stabilization and possible risks of such policy for Russia are considered. Special attention is paid to the issue of choice of a "target" currency composite which can minimize external inflation pass-through.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document