Polyoxotitanate Molecular Cage Featuring Four Types of Ethylenediamines: Formation Mechanism Insight from Host–Guest Interaction and Crystallographic Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoqin Cui ◽  
Fu-Qiang Zhang ◽  
Xin Li ◽  
Juan-Juan Hou ◽  
Huan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Formation Mechanism ◽  
Crystallographic Study

scholarly journals The formation of impact coesite

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Campanale ◽  
E. Mugnaioli ◽  
M. Gemmi ◽  
L. Folco
Keyword(s):  
Shock Wave ◽  
Amorphous Phase ◽  
Formation Mechanism ◽  
Nucleation And Growth ◽  
Transformation Model ◽  
Porous Rocks ◽  
Formation Pathway ◽  
Crystallographic Study ◽  
Impact Ejecta ◽  
Topotactic Transformation

AbstractCoesite in impact rocks is traditionally considered a retrograde product formed during pressure release by the crystallisation of an amorphous phase (either silica melt or diaplectic glass). Recently, the detailed microscopic and crystallographic study of impact ejecta from Kamil crater and the Australasian tektite strewn field pointed in turn to a different coesite formation pathway, through subsolidus quartz-to-coesite transformation. We report here further evidence documenting the formation of coesite directly from quartz. In Kamil ejecta we found sub-micrometric single-coesite-crystals that represent the first crystallization seeds of coesite. Coesite in Australasian samples show instead well-developed subeuhedral crystals, growing at the expenses of hosting quartz and postdating PDF deformation. Coesite (010) plane is most often parallel to quartz {10–11} plane family, supporting the formation of coesite through a topotactic transformation. Such reaction is facilitated by the presence of pre-existing and shock-induced discontinuities in the target. Shock wave reverberations can provide pressure and time conditions for coesite nucleation and growth. Because discontinuities occur in both porous and non-porous rocks and the coesite formation mechanism appears similar for small and large impacts, we infer that the proposed subsolidus transformation model is valid for all types of quartz-bearing target rocks.

Polymorphic phase transition of a membrane protein - analysis of continuous diffuse electron diffraction intensity

1986 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 166-167
Author(s):  
Douglas L. Dorset ◽  
Andrew K. Massalski
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Sieve ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Pore Geometry ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Diffraction Intensity ◽  
Polymorphic Phase Transition ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Crystallographic Study ◽  
Hexagonal Form ◽  
Polymorphic Forms

Matrix porin, the ompF gene product of E. coli, has been the object of a electron crystallographic study of its pore geometry in an attempt to understand its function as a membrane molecular sieve. Three polymorphic forms have been found for two-dimensional crystals reconstituted in phospholipid, two hexagonal forms with different lipid content and an orthorhombic form coexisting with and similar to the hexagonal form found after lipid loss. In projection these have been shown to retain the same three-fold pore triplet geometry and analyses of three-dimensional data reveal that the small hexagonal and orthorhombic polymorphs have similar structure as well as unit cell spacings.

A Crystallographic Study of Bis[S-benzyl-5-bromo-2-oxoindolin-3-ylidenemethanehydrazonthioate] Disulfide Solvated with Dimethylsulfoxide

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Mohd Abdul Fatah Abdul Manan ◽  
M. Ibrahim M. Tahir ◽  
Karen A. Crouse ◽  
Fiona N.-F. How ◽  
David J. Watkin
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structure ◽  
Hydrogen Bonds ◽  
Solvent Molecule ◽  
Site Occupancy ◽  
Unit Cell Parameters ◽  
Intermolecular Hydrogen Bonds ◽  
Triclinic Space Group ◽  
Cell Parameters ◽  
Crystallographic Study ◽  
Thiol Form

The crystal structure of the title compound has been determined. The compound crystallized in the triclinic space group P -1, Z = 2, V = 1839 .42( 18) A3 and unit cell parameters a= 11. 0460( 6) A, b = 13 .3180(7) A, c=13. 7321 (8) A, a = 80.659(3 )0, b = 69 .800(3 )0 and g = 77 .007 (2)0 with one disordered dimethylsulfoxide solvent molecule with the sulfur and oxygen atoms are distributed over two sites; S101/S102 [site occupancy factors: 0.6035/0.3965] and 0130/0131 [site occupancy factor 0.3965/0.6035]. The C22-S2 l and C 19-S20 bond distances of 1. 779(7) A and 1. 788(8) A indicate that both of the molecules are connected by the disulfide bond [S20-S21 2.055(2) A] in its thiol form. The crystal structure reveals that both of the 5-bromoisatin moieties are trans with respect to the [S21-S20 and CI 9-Nl 8] and [S20-S21 and C22-N23] bonds whereas the benzyl group from the dithiocarbazate are in the cis configuration with respect to [S21-S20 and C19-S44] and [S20-S21 and C22-S36] bonds. The crystal structure is further stabilized by intermolecular hydrogen bonds of N9-H35···O16 formed between the two molecules and N28-H281 ···O130, N28-H281 ···O131 and C4 l-H4 l l ···O 131 with the solvent molecule.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document