scholarly journals Antibacterial Honeycomb Scaffolds for Achieving Infection Prevention and Bone Regeneration

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichiro Hayashi ◽  
Masaya Shimabukuro ◽  
Kunio Ishikawa
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Infection Prevention

Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Graft for Infection Prevention and Bone Regeneration in Posterolateral Spinal Fusion

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. S167
Author(s):  
Stefanie M. Shiels ◽  
Patrick Patterson ◽  
Brian Barnes ◽  
Vivek Raut ◽  
Joseph Wenke
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Spinal Fusion ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Posterolateral Spinal Fusion

Decellularized bone extracellular matrix in skeletal tissue engineering

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 755-764
Author(s):  
Benjamin B. Rothrauff ◽  
Rocky S. Tuan
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Tissue Regeneration ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Regenerative Capacity ◽  
Skeletal Tissue ◽  
Large Bone

Bone possesses an intrinsic regenerative capacity, which can be compromised by aging, disease, trauma, and iatrogenesis (e.g. tumor resection, pharmacological). At present, autografts and allografts are the principal biological treatments available to replace large bone segments, but both entail several limitations that reduce wider use and consistent success. The use of decellularized extracellular matrices (ECM), often derived from xenogeneic sources, has been shown to favorably influence the immune response to injury and promote site-appropriate tissue regeneration. Decellularized bone ECM (dbECM), utilized in several forms — whole organ, particles, hydrogels — has shown promise in both in vitro and in vivo animal studies to promote osteogenic differentiation of stem/progenitor cells and enhance bone regeneration. However, dbECM has yet to be investigated in clinical studies, which are needed to determine the relative efficacy of this emerging biomaterial as compared with established treatments. This mini-review highlights the recent exploration of dbECM as a biomaterial for skeletal tissue engineering and considers modifications on its future use to more consistently promote bone regeneration.

Rapid Test Has Its Place in GBS Infection Prevention

Ob Gyn News ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (21) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
SHARON WORCESTER
Keyword(s):  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Rapid Test

Blood Infection Prevention Tips Underutilized

2007 ◽  
Vol 37 (14) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Bruce Jancin
Keyword(s):  
Infection Prevention

Placenta mesenchymal stem cells on a chorion scaffold as a potential osteogenic graft for peripartal bone regeneration

2008 ◽  
Vol 68 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Mohr ◽  
BC Portmann-Lanz ◽  
A Schoeberlein ◽  
R Sager ◽  
DV Surbek
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Mesenchymal Stem Cells ◽  
Bone Regeneration

Combination of novel two-photon photopolymerised scaffolds and bioactive elastin-like-recombinamers induce bone regeneration

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina Kampleitner ◽  
Gerhard Hildebrand ◽  
Klaus Liefeith ◽  
Constancio Gonzalez ◽  
Jose Carlos Rodriguez-Cabello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Two Photon

SauFRa technique for the fixation of resorbable membranes in horizontal guided bone regeneration - a technical report

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saurabh Mohan Kamat ◽  
Rakshit Khandeparker ◽  
Francis Akkara ◽  
Vikas Dhupar ◽  
Ashwin Mysore
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Novel Technique ◽  
Technical Report ◽  
Suturing Techniques ◽  
Graft Migration

Membrane fixation in guided bone regeneration (GBR) has been traditionally achieved using resorbable pins, titanium tacks or miniscrews. However, these techniques are marredwith a number of clinical challenges. This article presents the “SauFRa” technique, a novel technique for stabilization of resorbable membranes in both, single as well as multiple implant sites while avoiding the shortcomings of other suturing techniques described in literature. Furthermore, the technique also eliminates the possibility of complications observed when using resorbable pins, titanium tacks or miniscrews, such as damage to adjacent roots during insertion. The authors’ employed this technique in 89 patients (51 male and 35 female) and found no complications like tissue dehiscence, infection or graft migration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document