scholarly journals Correction to “Performance of a Small-Scale Haber Process: A Techno-Economic analysis”

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1969-1969
Author(s):  
Bosong Lin ◽  
Theodore Wiesner ◽  
Mahdi Malmali
2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q. S. Yin ◽  
H. Y. Li ◽  
Q. H. Fan ◽  
L. X. Jia ◽  
J. G. Weisend ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mauro Villarini ◽  
Enrico Bocci ◽  
Andrea Di Carlo ◽  
Danilo Sbordone ◽  
Maria Carmen Falvo ◽  
...  

Fuel ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 279 ◽  
pp. 118552 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Sousa Cardoso ◽  
Valter Silva ◽  
Daniela Eusébio ◽  
Inês Lima Azevedo ◽  
Luís A.C. Tarelho

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (15) ◽  
pp. 5391
Author(s):  
Sang Hyun Lee ◽  
Dong-Ha Lim ◽  
Kyungtae Park

In this study, exergy and economic analysis were conducted to gain insight on small-scale movable LNG liquefaction considering leakage. Optimization and comparison were performed to demonstrate the quantitative results of single mixed refrigerant, dual nitrogen expansion, and the propane pre-cooling self-refrigeration processes. For the optimization, exergy efficiency was used as the objective function; the results showed that exergy efficiencies are 38.85%, 19.96%, and 13.65%, for single mixed refrigerant, dual nitrogen expansion, and propane pre-cooling self-refrigeration, respectively. Further, the cost analysis showed that the product cost of each process is 4002.3 USD/tpa, 5490.2 USD/tpa, and 9608.5 USD/tpa. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine parameters that affect exergy and cost. The SMR process is the most competitive in terms of exergy efficiency, product cost, and operability, without considering makeup facilities.


Energy Policy ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 2569-2578 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.F. Dzenajavičienė ◽  
V. Kveselis ◽  
C. McNaught ◽  
M. Tamonis

2020 ◽  
Vol 157 ◽  
pp. 1008-1024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tryfon C. Roumpedakis ◽  
George Loumpardis ◽  
Evropi Monokrousou ◽  
Konstantinos Braimakis ◽  
Antonios Charalampidis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document