Chromatographic Science Series. Volume 83. Micellar Liquid Chromatography By Alain Berthod (Universite Claude Bernard, Lyon 1) and Celia Garcia-Alvarez-Coque (University of Valencia). Marcel Dekker:  New York and Basel. 2000. 632 pp. $195. ISBN 0-8247-9993-3.

2000 ◽  
Vol 122 (48) ◽  
pp. 12068-12068
Author(s):  
Colin F. Poole
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Micellar Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Claude Bernard

Micellar liquid chromatography of plant extracts components

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 420-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Stępnik ◽  
Irena Malinowska ◽  
Edward Rój
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Plant Extracts ◽  
Micellar Liquid Chromatography

Selectivity in Micellar Liquid Chromatography: Surfactant Bondee Phase Interactions. I. C-18

1997 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry K. Lavine ◽  
Sumar Hendayana ◽  
William T. Cooper ◽  
Yifang He
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Micellar Liquid Chromatography

scholarly journals Analysis of Some Biogenic Amines by Micellar Liquid Chromatography

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irena Malinowska ◽  
Katarzyna E. Stępnik
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate ◽  
Biogenic Amines ◽  
Physicochemical Parameters ◽  
Mobile Phase ◽  
Sodium Dodecyl ◽  
Micellar Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Ionic Surfactant ◽  
Mobile Phases ◽  
Dodecyl Sulfate

Micellar liquid chromatography (MLC) with the use of high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to determine some physicochemical parameters of six biogenic amines: adrenaline, dopamine, octopamine, histamine, 2-phenylethylamine, and tyramine. In this paper, an influence of surfactant’s concentration and pH of the micellar mobile phase on the retention of the tested substances was examined. To determine the influence of surfactant’s concentration on the retention of the tested amines, buffered solutions (at pH 7.4) of ionic surfactant—sodium dodecyl sulfate SDS (at different concentrations) with acetonitrile as an organic modifier (0.8/0.2 v/v) were used as the micellar mobile phases. To determine the influence of pH of the micellar mobile phase on the retention, mobile phases contained buffered solutions (at different pH values) of sodium dodecyl sulfate SDS (at 0.1 M) with acetonitrile (0.8/0.2 v/v). The inverse of value of retention factor () versus concentration of micelles () relationships were examined. Other physicochemical parameters of solutes such as an association constant analyte—micelle ()—and partition coefficient of analyte between stationary phase and water (hydrophobicity descriptor) () were determined by the use of Foley’s equation.

Gradient elution in micellar liquid chromatography I. Micelle concentration gradient

1994 ◽  
Vol 683 (2) ◽  
pp. 321-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lillian S. Madamba-Tan ◽  
Joost K. Strasters ◽  
Morteza G. Khaledi
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Concentration Gradient ◽  
Gradient Elution ◽  
Micellar Liquid Chromatography
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document