Novel Chitosan Particles and Chitosan-Coated Emulsions Inducing Immune Response via Intranasal Vaccine Delivery

2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 671-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Nagamoto ◽  
Yoshiyuki Hattori ◽  
Kozo Takayama ◽  
Yoshie Maitani
Nanocarriers ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vandana Patravale ◽  
Priyanka Prabhu

AbstractVaccination has indubitably made noteworthy contribution to global health. Recent years have witnessed the employment of subunit antigens rather than inactivated or live attenuated vaccines, owing to the superior safety of the former. The intrinsic weak immunogenicity of subunit antigens makes it imperative to formulate them with an adjuvant. Presently, the armamentarium of approved vaccine adjuvants is very poor. Nanocarriers hold great promise for successful vaccine delivery owing to their versatility, excellent cellular uptake properties, capacity to protect antigen, amenability to targeting, and ability to offer prolonged antigen presentation. All these attributes ultimately endow nanocarriers with immense potential to achieve needle-free vaccine delivery, reduce the number of vaccinations, attain dose sparing of antigen, and lead to stronger immune response generation. Nanocarriers can be explored in manifold ways to accomplish targeted antigen delivery to antigen presenting cells. They can be formulated to contain both antigen and immunostimulant molecules, and they can be engineered from specific materials to achieve antigen presentation through the desired pathway to stimulate a particular arm of the immune response. This review discusses the basics of immune response generation, mechanisms of adjuvanticity by nanocarriers, parameters influencing their adjuvanticity, and finally describes the incredible opportunities offered by a gamut of nanocarriers for vaccine delivery


Author(s):  
Andrew Hill ◽  
Marie Beitelshees ◽  
Blaine A. Pfeifer

2009 ◽  
Vol 75 (24) ◽  
pp. 7739-7744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie A. Parlane ◽  
D. Neil Wedlock ◽  
Bryce M. Buddle ◽  
Bernd H. A. Rehm

ABSTRACT Bioengineered bacterial polyester inclusions have the potential to be used as a vaccine delivery system. The biopolyester beads were engineered to display a fusion protein of the polyester synthase PhaC and the two key antigens involved in immune response to the infectious agent that causes tuberculosis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, notably antigen 85A (Ag85A) and the 6-kDa early secreted antigenic target (ESAT-6) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Polyester beads displaying the respective fusion protein at a high density were successfully produced (henceforth called Ag85A-ESAT-6 beads) by recombinant Escherichia coli. The ability of the Ag85A-ESAT-6 beads to enhance mouse immunity to the displayed antigens was investigated. The beads were not toxic to the animals, as determined by weight gain and absence of lesions at the inoculation site in immunized animals. In vivo injection of the Ag85A-ESAT-6 beads in mice induced significant humoral and cell-mediated immune responses to both Ag85A and ESAT-6. Vaccination with Ag85A-ESAT-6 beads was efficient at stimulating immunity on their own, and this ability was enhanced by administration of the beads in an oil-in-water emulsion. In addition, vaccination with the Ag85A-ESAT-6 beads induced significantly stronger humoral and cell-mediated immune responses than vaccination with an equivalent dose of the fusion protein Ag85A-ESAT-6 alone. The immune response induced by the beads was of a mixed Th1/Th2 nature, as assessed from the induction of the cytokine gamma interferon (Th1 immune response) and increased levels of immunoglobulin G1 (Th2 immune response). Hence, engineered biopolyester beads displaying foreign antigens represent a new class of versatile, safe, and biocompatible vaccines.


2016 ◽  
Vol 513 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 410-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirmal Marasini ◽  
Zeinab G. Khalil ◽  
Ashwini Kumar Giddam ◽  
Khairunnisa Abdul Ghaffar ◽  
Waleed M. Hussein ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 1934578X2110427
Author(s):  
Alberto Boretti

Quercetin is an antioxidant, detox, and anti-inflammatory agent, which may help lower inflammation as well as reduce toxic effects. It has been argued that vaccines have potential risks of local and systemic inflammatory responses and toxic effects of synthetic nucleosides and components for vaccine delivery. Administration of substances such as Quercetin may then mitigate these effects. It has similarly been argued that substances such as Quercetin may reduce the efficacy of vaccines, which works in building an immune response to produce antibodies. Under this other perspective, the assumption of Quercetin should be avoided when receiving vaccines. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the information available to understand if Quercetin may mitigate the damage from novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, or also reduce their efficacy.


Vaccine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (18) ◽  
pp. 3464-3473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer H. Wilson-Welder ◽  
Paola Boggiatto ◽  
Jarlath E. Nally ◽  
Emad I. Wafa ◽  
David P. Alt ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document