Treatment of visceral artery aneurysms: Retrospective study of 35 cases

VASA ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Popov ◽  
Boskovic ◽  
Sagic ◽  
Radevic ◽  
Ilijevski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Celiac Trunk ◽  
Visceral Artery ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Active Approach ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Visceral Artery Aneurysms ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Age Range

Background: Visceral artery aneurysms (VAA) represent a rare clinical entity with possible life-threatening complications. The presentation, diagnosis and management vary accordingly to the artery involved and the underlying pathology. Patients and methods: During a 25-year period (1980–2005), 35 patients (25 males + 10 females, age range 36–73 years-median 59.2 years) with VAA were treated at two tertiary vascular surgery centers in Belgrade. All data were retrospectively collected from the patient’s records. Results: On presentation, 19/35 patients were symptomatic, and 3/35 had ruptured VAA. Surgery was performed in 28 cases; most commonly involved arteries were splenic (11), hepatic (5), celiac trunk (5), superior mesenteric (3), inferior mesenteric (3) and gastroduodenal (1). Fatal rupture occurred in two patients. In 5 patients abdominal aortic aneurysm was associated with VAA, and in 4 patients multiple aneurysms of the involved artery were noted. Successful embolization was performed in 3 patients. Overall, four patients were treated medically. In the surgically treated patients, perioperative mortality and morbidity were 11% (3/28) and 40% (10/25) respectively. Of 25 patients included in the long-term follow up, six died. Conclusion: Since VAA have considerable tendency to rupture, an active approach is necessary. Based on our experience, surgical treatment could be recommended for any VAA patient with symptoms. In addition, we believe that the choice of the therapeutic procedure should be made on an individual basis.

Endovascular Treatment of Visceral Artery Aneurysms

2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Gabelmann ◽  
Johannes Görich ◽  
Elmar M. Merkle
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Necrotizing Pancreatitis ◽  
Artery Aneurysm ◽  
Endovascular Embolization ◽  
Visceral Artery ◽  
Recurrent Bleeding ◽  
Visceral Artery Aneurysms ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Transcatheter Coil Embolization

Purpose: To review a 10-year experience with endovascular embolization of visceral artery aneurysms. Methods: Twenty-five patients (13 men; mean age 52.1 years, range 31–80) presented with VAAs of varying locations and etiologies: 10 splenic, 3 gastroduodenal, 2 pancreaticoduodenal, 3 hepatic, 3 superior mesenteric, 2 celiac, 1 left gastric, and 1 jejunoileal. Ten patients were asymptomatic; 7 aneurysms were ruptured. Transcatheter coil embolization was the treatment of choice in all patients. Results: Coil placement was initially (<7 days) successful in 23 (92%) patients. One superior mesenteric artery aneurysm remained perfused, and recurrent bleeding occurred 2 days after intervention in 1 case, but repeated embolization excluded the aneurysm. One patient with necrotizing pancreatitis died from sepsis 10 days after endovascular treatment and surgery (4% 30-day mortality). Long-term follow-up revealed excellent results after an average 48.7 months (range 14–75) with only 1 recurrence after 12 months. Conclusions: Embolotherapy is the treatment of choice in visceral artery aneurysms, regardless of etiology, location, or clinical presentation.

Endovascular Exclusion of Visceral Artery Aneurysms with Stent-Grafts: Technique and Long-Term Follow-up

2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Rossi ◽  
Alberto Rebonato ◽  
Laura Greco ◽  
Michele Citone ◽  
Vincenzo David
Keyword(s):  
Visceral Artery ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Visceral Artery Aneurysms ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

scholarly journals Endovascular management of giant visceral artery aneurysms

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcello Andrea Tipaldi ◽  
Miltiadis Krokidis ◽  
Gianluigi Orgera ◽  
Matteo Pignatelli ◽  
Edoardo Ronconi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Splenic Abscess ◽  
Visceral Artery ◽  
Complete Relief ◽  
Endovascular Management ◽  
Visceral Artery Aneurysms ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

AbstractEndovascular management of small visceral artery aneurysms is an established treatment with satisfactory outcomes. However, when size exceeds 5 cm visceral aneurysms are considered as “giant” (giant visceral artery aneurysms or GVAAs) and management is significantly more complex. Between August 2007 and June 2019 eleven cases of GVAAs that were endovascularly treated were retrospectively reviewed and included in this single center study. Mean size was 80 mm (± 26.3 mm) x 46 mm (+ \-11.8 mm). Nine of the lesions were true aneurysms, and two were pseudoaneurysms. In 8 patients, the lesion was causing compression symptoms in the surrounding organs, one patient developed a contained rupture while 2 patients were completely asymptomatic. However, all patients were hemodynamically stable at the time of treatment. Technical success was defined as immediate complete exclusion of the aneurysmal sac, and clinical success as complete relief from clinical symptoms. Follow-up was performed with CT angiography, ultrasound and clinical examination. Mean follow-up was 45 months (range 6–84). Technical and clinical success were both 91%. Complications were one lack of control of contained rupture that was subsequently operated, one case of self-limiting non-target spleen embolization and one case of splenic abscess. Three patients died, one due to the contained rupture 15 days after procedure, the other two for other causes and occurred during the long-term follow-up. This series suggests that endovascular treatment of giant visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneuryms is a valid minimally invasive solution with very satisfactory immediate and long-term outcomes unless the aneurysm is already ruptured. A variety of endovascular tools may be required for successful treatment.

Endovascular treatment of visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms - evaluation of efficacy and safety based on long-term results

2019 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Pyra ◽  
Maciej Szmygin ◽  
Michał Sojka ◽  
Anna Drelich-Zbroja ◽  
Tomasz Jargiełło
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Visceral Artery ◽  
Covered Stents ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Visceral Artery Aneurysms ◽  
Life Threatening

Background: With estimated prevalence of 1% of the general population, visceral artery aneurysms are not a frequent pathology, however, their rupture is a life-threatening occurrence with mortality rate ranging from 10% to 25%, up to 75% in case of pregnant women. Therefore, the identification and treatment of visceral artery aneurysms is of great importance in the prevention of early rupture. Purpose: To assess the effectiveness and safety of treatment of visceral artery aneurysms with various endovascular methods focusing on technical aspects, complications and long-term clinical outcome. Materials and Methods: 60 patients with visceral artery aneurysms were treated percutaneously. Various techniques were used: coiling (23), covered stents (15), thrombin (7), and other mixed techniques. Aneurysm characteristics, size and localization, procedural data, peri-procedural complications, technical success, 90- and 180-day clinical success and follow-up period (aneurysm exclusion, patency of the artery and complications) were prospectively analyzed. Results: Te procedure was performed in 57 of 60 patients. In 56 of 57 patients aneurysms ware effectively excluded. Te success rate was 93.3% (56 of 60 enrolled patients). Technical success after the intervention was 82.4%, after second 98.2%. Embolization with covered stents ware characterized by highest efficiency. Serious complications occurred in 1.8% of cases. Conclusions. The minimally invasive endovascular treatment of visceral artery aneurysms is characterized by high efficacy and safety. Good treatment results depend on proper assessment of the aneurysm’s morphology as well as on selection of the appropriate vascular approach and endovascular technique.

No relation between biomarkers at age 47–49 and aortic diameter after 14–19 years of follow-up – a population-based study

VASA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soumia Taimour ◽  
Moncef Zarrouk ◽  
Jan Holst ◽  
Olle Melander ◽  
Gunar Engström ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Population Based ◽  
Aortic Diameter ◽  
Aortic Dilatation ◽  
Population Based Study ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Old Men

Abstract. Background: Biomarkers reflecting diverse pathophysiological pathways may play an important role in the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysm (aortic diameter ≥30 mm, AAA), levels of many biomarkers are elevated and correlated to aortic diameter among 65-year-old men undergoing ultrasound (US) screening for AAA. Probands and methods: To evaluate potential relationships between biomarkers and aortic dilatation after long-term follow-up, levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), proneurotensin (PNT), copeptin (CPT), lipoprotein-associated phospholipase 2 (Lp-PLA2), cystatin C (Cyst C), midregional proatrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), and midregional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) were measured in 117 subjects (114 [97 %] men) aged 47–49 in a prospective population-based cohort study, and related to aortic diameter at US examination of the aorta after 14–19 years of follow-up. Results: Biomarker levels at baseline did not correlate with aortic diameter after 14–19 years of follow up (CRP [r = 0.153], PNT [r = 0.070], CPT [r = –.156], Lp-PLA2 [r = .024], Cyst C [r = –.015], MR-proANP [r = 0.014], MR-proADM [r = –.117]). Adjusting for age and smoking at baseline in a linear regression model did not reveal any significant correlations. Conclusions: Tested biomarker levels at age 47–49 were not associated with aortic diameter at ultrasound examination after 14–19 years of follow-up. If there are relationships between these biomarkers and aortic dilatation, they are not relevant until closer to AAA diagnosis.

Fifteen-minute consultation: how to identify and treat children with acute kidney injury

2021 ◽  
pp. edpract-2020-319928
Author(s):  
Maura Scott ◽  
Grace McCall
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Fluid Management ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Case Presentation ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Fluid Status ◽  
Close Observation ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is under-recognised in children and neonates. It is associated with increased mortality and morbidity along with an increased incidence of chronic kidney disease in adulthood. It is important that paediatricians are able to recognise AKI quickly, enabling prompt treatment of reversible causes. In this article, we demonstrate an approach to recognising paediatric AKI, cessation of nephrotoxic medication, appropriate investigations and the importance of accurately assessing fluid status. The mainstay of treatment is attempting to mimic the kidneys ability to provide electrolyte and fluid homeostasis; this requires close observation and careful fluid management. We discuss referral to paediatric nephrology and the importance of long-term follow-up. We present an approach to AKI through case-presentation.

Haemofiltration in the Management of Severe Paediatric Burns – Experience in a UK Burns Centre and Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Rice ◽  
Ibrahim Ibrahim ◽  
Mohamed Ismail Aly
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Metabolic Acidosis ◽  
Acute Injury ◽  
Secondary Complications ◽  
Paediatric Burns ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Age Range ◽  
And Control ◽  
Renal Support

Abstract Paediatric burns are life-threatening injuries due to the acute injury and secondary complications. In acute phase burns, hypovolaemia and vasoconstriction cause renal impairment. Sepsis and multi-organ failure compound the problem resulting in morbidity and mortality. This paper outlines 5 years’ experience using haemofiltration in major paediatric burns, and a review of the current literature.Retrospective patient data collection was undertaken identifying relevant paediatric burns undergoing Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration. Data were analysed to identify demographics, indication, duration of therapy, and outcomes. A systematic review was also performed using PRISMA principles. PubMed, Science Direct and OVID databases were explored and relevant papers were included.From January 2015-December 2019, haemofiltration was utilised in 5 cases. Age range 3-15 years (mean: 12), 4 males / 1 female, mean weight 56kg (12-125kg). TBSA 21-61% (mean: 37.6%), mechanism of injury was scald-60%, flame-40%. Overall survival was 100%. 3 patients were filtered for a brief period during the first 24 hours to correct metabolic acidosis and control temperature. 2 patients required prolonged therapy. All patients recovered without further long term renal support. A total of 3814 papers were identified for systematic review. 3 were considered relevant for inclusion.This paper reflects the benefits of haemofiltration in the management of severe paediatric burns. Renal replacement therapy is useful in managing metabolic acidosis, temperature control and renal failure. The current literature supports judicious use on a patient-by-patient basis. Given the lack of evidence in the literature, further studies are required to establish guidelines for the use of haemofiltration in paediatric burns.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Men Invited to Participate in a Population-Based Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Program

Angiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (7) ◽  
pp. 641-649
Author(s):  
Rebecka Hultgren ◽  
K. Miriam Elfström ◽  
Daniel Öhman ◽  
Anneli Linné
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Dropout Rate ◽  
Rupture Rate ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

A screening program for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), inviting 65-year-old men, was started in Stockholm in 2010 (2.3 million inhabitants). The aim was to present a long-term follow-up of men participating in screening, as well as AAA repair and ruptures among nonparticipants. Demographics were collected for men with screening detected with AAA 2010 to 2016 (n = 672) and a control group with normal aortas at screening (controls, n = 237). Medical charts and regional Swedvasc (Swedish Vascular registry) data were analyzed for aortic repair for men born 1945 to 1951. Ultrasound maximum aortic diameter (AD) as well as Aortic Size Index (ASI) was recorded. Participation was 78% and prevalence of AAA was 1.2% (n = 672). Aortic repair rates correlated with high ASI and AD. During the study period, 22% of the AAA patients were treated with the elective repair; 35 men in surveillance died (5.2%), non-AAA-related causes (82.9%) dominated, followed by unknown causes among 4 (11.4%), and 2 (5.7%) possibly AAA-related deaths. Abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture rate was higher among nonparticipants (0.096% vs 0.0036%, P < .001). The low dropout rate confirms acceptability of follow-up after screening. The efficacy is shown by the much higher rupture rate among the nonparticipating men.

scholarly journals Aorto-esophageal fistula: successful open surgical management of two cases

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siddharth Pahwa ◽  
Susmit Bhattacharya ◽  
Siddhartha Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Ashok Verma
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Management ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Hemodynamic Instability ◽  
Esophageal Fistula ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Dacron Patch ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

Abstract An aorto-esophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare yet life-threatening cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. We report our experience with open surgical management of two cases of AEF. Both cases presented with almost identical presentations: hematemesis and hemodynamic instability. The aorta in the first patient was normal; the defect was small and was repaired with a Dacron patch. The second patient had an aneurysmal aorta, which was replaced with a Dacron graft. Both cases were performed under partial bypass. The esophageal rent in both patients was debrided, primarily closed and buttressed with a vascularized intercostal pedicle. Nonavailability of endovascular personnel and equipment along with hemodynamic instability of the patient influenced our surgical strategy. Long-term follow-up of these patients is necessary to analyze the outcomes of our surgical repair.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document