A dreadful sign of aortic dissection: Aortic intimo-intimal intussusception with prominent intimal flap prolapsing into the left ventricular apex

VASA ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozer ◽  
Davutoglu ◽  
Burma ◽  
Sucu ◽  
Sarı

Intimo-intimal intussusception is an unusual clinical form of aortic dissection resulting from circumferential detachment of the intima. Clinical presentation varies according to the level of detached intima in the aorta. We present a case of acute type A dissection with prominent prolapse of the circumferential detachment intimal flap into the left ventricular cavity extended to the apex.

2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 519-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
John G.T. Augoustides ◽  
Wilson Y. Szeto ◽  
Nimesh D. Desai ◽  
Alberto Pochettino ◽  
Albert T. Cheung ◽  
...  

Choonpa Igaku ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-499
Author(s):  
Fumihiko HARA ◽  
Masahiko HARADA ◽  
Koichi YOSHIKAWA ◽  
Kyoko HAYASHI ◽  
Yuichi TAKARADA ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony L Estrera ◽  
Charles C Miller ◽  
Ali Azizzadeh ◽  
Taek-Yeon Lee ◽  
Saad Abdullah ◽  
...  

Introduction: Recent reports of retrograde acute type A aortic dissection (RTAAD) following thoracic aortic endovascular repair have been associated with poor outcomes. This raises concerns about outcomes with RTAAD in general. We report and compare outcomes of retrograde acute Type A aortic dissection repair with classic acute aortic dissection (CAAD). Methods: Between 8/1991 and 5/2008, we repaired 322 patients with acute type A dissection. This cohort was divided into two groups: RTAAD Group (52 cases), and CAAD Group (270 cases). RTAAD was defined as the presence of a dissection tear originating distal to the arch as identified intra-operatively. Tears in the ascending aorta denoted dissection as classic. Repairs using circulatory arrest were similar between groups, p>0.33. Preoperative, operative, and post-operative variables were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Retrograde type A aortic dissection occurred in 16.1% (52/322) of patients. RTAAD differed from CAAD in the median time from initial symptoms to operation (75+−87 hours vs. 47+−61 hours) and specific presenting conditions. (See Table 1 ) Outcomes (stroke: RTAAD, 2.1% vs. CAAD, 3.6%, bleeding: 4% vs. 9%, myocardial infarction: 6% vs. 6%, and mortality: 11% vs. 18%) did not differ significantly between the groups, p>0.05. Conclusions: RTAAD presented later for repair and less frequently with redo-sternotomy and aortic valvular insufficiency. Despite these differences, outcomes from surgical repair did not differ significantly. Acceptable outcomes may be achieved with timely intervention. Table 1: Preoperative Variables


Circulation ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 106 (12_suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer G. Leyh ◽  
Stefan Fischer ◽  
Klaus Kallenbach ◽  
Theo Kofidis ◽  
Klaus Pethig ◽  
...  

Background Valve-sparing surgery including the replacement of the sinus of valsalvae were initially meant to be promising approaches in the treatment of acute type A aortic dissection. However, the long-term outcome after valve-sparing aortic root replacement in acute type A dissection is currently the subject of intense debate, and the evidence reported in the literature is sparse. Here we report on our experience on valve sparing aortic root replacement inpatients with acute type A dissection. Methods From August 1995 to November 2000, 30 patients with acute type A dissection received valve-sparing aortic root replacement. Two different techniques were performed: the “remodeling” technique, first described by Yacoub in 1983 (8 patients) and the “reimplantation” technique, initially described by David and Feindel, in 1992 (22 patients). Endpoints of the study were early and late mortality, as well as aortic valve-related complications and reoperations. Results The mean follow-up time was 22.6±15.4 months. The overall 30 day mortality was 17% (5/29) and the late mortality 4% (1/24). During the observation period, 4 patients had to be reoperated (n=3) for acute aortic valve regurgitation after aortic root remodeling and for acute aortic valve endocarditis (n=1) after aortic root reimplantation. In the 3 patients with acute aortic valve regurgitation, symptoms occurred 44, 24, and 17 months after the initial operation in these patients. Intraoperatively prolapsing aortic leaflets because of commissural detachment was found in all 3 cases. In all other patients the latest echocardiographic follow-up examination revealed freedom from aortic regugitation higher than grade 1. Conclusions The high failure rate of aortic root remodeling inpatients with acute type A aortic dissection is discouraging. Whether this technique should be applied in acute type A aortic dissection is questionable. In contrast, aortic root reimplantation lead to favorable midterm outcome. Thus, we recommend consideration of this technique for surgical treatment of patients with acute type A aortic dissection.


2010 ◽  
Vol 58 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Kobuch ◽  
S Hirt ◽  
L Rupprecht ◽  
M Hilker ◽  
C Schmid

Aorta ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 03 (06) ◽  
pp. 195-198
Author(s):  
Guillermo Stöger ◽  
Matías Ríos ◽  
Roberto Battellini ◽  
Daniel Bracco ◽  
Vadim Kotowicz

AbstractThe correct management of acute Type A dissection continues to be a challenge. The primary goal is to save the patient´s life. However, the decision regarding the surgical approach determines possible later complications. We present the case of a 59-year-old female patient with a past history of emergent surgery for acute Type A dissection treated by supracoronary ascending and aortic valve replacement 19 years previously. Later, in a second endovascular approach, the descending aorta was treated by a thoracic endoprosthesis. During follow-up a dilated aortic root and a Type I endoleak were observed, and complex reoperation was required. We performed a total aortic arch replacement with a 4-branched graft and a complete aortic root replacement using the Cabrol technique for the reinsertion of the coronary arteries. The mechanical aortic normally functioning valve was preserved. The patient was discharged 30 days postoperatively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document