Advance Care Planning for Persons with Intellectual Disabilities

GeroPsych ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monika T. Wicki

Abstract. As people live longer, they become more likely to die from prolonged, incurable, chronic illnesses occurring more frequently in old age. This study explores the usefulness, quality, and reliability of documented advance care planning interviews to determine the decision-making capacity of persons with intellectual disabilities (IDs). A volunteer sample of 60 persons rated the capacity to consent to treatment of four persons deciding on two end-of-life decisions. Sensitivity, specificity, and percent agreement were calculated. Interrater reliability was assessed using Fleiss’ κ and Krippendorff’s α. A Yates’ corrected χ2 was used to analyze differences in ratings between groups of raters. The sensitivity value was 62%; the specificity value was 95%. The percent agreement for all participants was 70%, Fleiss’ κ was 0.396, and Krippendorff’s α was 0.395. Of the participants, 72 found documented advance care planning discussions useful for diagnosing the decision-making capacity of people with IDs. The documented interviews helped to identify those persons with IDs who had the decision-making capacity. Documented interviews on end-of-life decisions could make a valuable contribution to fostering their self-determination in end-of-life issues.

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 233372142110217
Author(s):  
Irma Huayanay ◽  
Celia Pantoja ◽  
Chelsea Chang

COVID-19 pandemic brought difficult scenarios that patients and families are facing about end- of-life decisions. This exposed some weak areas in the healthcare system where we can continue improve in reducing disparities and emphasizing advance care planning from a primary level of care. We present a case of challenges in end-of-life decision-making in a Latino patient.


Author(s):  
Robert C. Macauley

A specific application of advance care planning has to do with determining the “code status” of a patient. Many of the terms used to document this status are misunderstood or carry unfortunate connotations, such as “DNR.” It is more appropriate to refer to a “Do Not Attempt Resuscitation” (DNAR), to emphasize the uncertainty as to whether attempted resuscitation will be successful. Code status is especially relevant to patients who “want everything,” which may include high-burden and low-benefit procedures. Time-limited trials and Do Not Escalate Treatment orders may be considered in those situations. There may also be situations when a patient’s refusal should be overridden, when the patient’s decision-making capacity is compromised.


2001 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seiji Bito ◽  
Neil S. Wenger ◽  
Momoyo Ohki ◽  
Shunichi Fukuhara

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 391-391
Author(s):  
Frederick Bartholomew ◽  
Laura M. De Castro

Abstract Abstract 391 Advance Care Planning (ACP) is the process by which patients, families and health care practitioners consider their values and goals and express preferences for future care. Written ACP includes living wills, designation of a health care proxy, and do not resuscitate (DNR) orders. ACP provides a legal framework for end-of-life decisions and aligns patient's care with his/her end-of-life decisions if their decision-making ability becomes compromised. The high mortality and potential for unexpected deadly complications among sickle cell disease (SCD) patients, suggests that end-of-life care conversations between patients, family members and providers should be a necessary and helpful aspect of routine health care. Despite the early mortality of SCD patients, there is a lack of information regarding: 1) use of ACP in this population; 2) need for ACP as perceived by patients; and 3) psychosocial impact of ACP information. We therefore performed a study with a three-fold purpose: 1) to determine patient's perceived need for ACP information and their experiences with ACP: thoughts, wishes, and comfort discussing ACP; 2) to explore how an informational intervention designed to teach patients how to understand and complete ACP changes patients' perception of need and comfort discussing ACP and 3) to examine the impact of ACP information on patient perceptions of disease controllability. We hypothesized that when asked about ACP planning, most SCD adults would indicate thinking about ACP issues, but a significant portion of this population would not have completed advance directives and/or indicated specific end-of-life wishes. All 70 subjects -47 (67%) females and 23 males- completed a Pre-Informational Questionnaire (Pre-Q), 60 requested and received the ACP education session, and 62 completed the Post-Informational Questionnaire (Post-Q). Mean age for the patients studied was 38.07 years (females 40.3, males 33.6). Sickle genotypes were as follows: HgbSS / Sβ0thal genotype: 45 (64%), HgbSC 16 (23%), and HgbSβ+thal 9 (13%). Sixty one (87% of the subjects), reported not having written decisions for end-of-life medical treatment. All 9 patients with written decision were females. The mean age was significantly different (p=.0128) between those with written decisions (52 yrs, 32 – 77 yrs) and those without (35 yrs, 18–60 yrs). Fifty-four of those who completed the Post-Q reported not having written ACPs when enrolled in the study. Mean time between completion of Pre-Q and Post-Q was 11.6 weeks (range 3 – 41).Sixty one patients requested ACP information. The mean age of those who did not want ACP information was 34.7, while the mean age of those who did was 38.6. All patients who had written ACPs requested more information. Variables Pre – Q N=61* Post – Q N=54** Thoughts on whom you would like to make decisions   Very Much 17 (28) 25 (47)   Somehow 29 (47) 23 (43)   Not much 15 (25) 5 (9) Specific wishes about medical treatments   Yes 28 (46) 30 (55)   No 5 (8) 8 (15)   Not sure 28 (46) 16 (30) Comfort level   Taking with Family     A 39 (64) 33 (61)     B 11 (18) 15 (27)     C 3 (5) 4 (8)     D 3 (5) 1 (2)     E 5 (8) 1 (2)   Taking with SCD provider     A 33 (54) 32 (60)     B 19 (30) 16 (30)     C 3 (5) 3 (6)     D 3 (5) 2 (4)     E 5 (8) 1 (2)   Appointing someone     A 28 (46) 26 (48)     B 21 (35) 18 (33)     C 2 (3) 6 (11)     D 5 (8) 2 (4)     E 5 (8) 2 (4) Control   Pain Episodes     A 9 (15) 8 (15)     B 32 (52) 28 (52)     C 15 (24) 14 (25)     D 5 (8) 3 (6)     E 0 1 (2)   Hospitalizations     A 13 (21) 12 (22)     B 33 (54) 29 (54)     C 12 (20) 10 (19)     D 3 (5) 2 (4)     E 0 1 (2)   Need/Use Medications     A 20 (33) 18 (33)     B 28 (46) 26 (48)     C 9 (15) 7 (13)     D 2 (3) 2 (4)     E 2 (3) 1 (2)   Disease Outcome     A 7 (11) 6 (11)     B 34 (55) 34 (62)     C 10 (16) 9 (17)     D 9 (16) 4 (8)     E 1 (2) 1 (2) A=Very B=Somewhat C=Not Very D=Not at All E= Not sure. * Patients without. ACP ** Patients without ACP that completed visit 2. We conclude that the majority of adult SCD patients studied do not have written advance directives (87%). This represents a large proportion of patients with chronic illness and high health services utilization but with unknown ACP wishes. About half (46%) of patients report having specific wishes about medical treatment if becoming very ill while an equal number are unsure, which shows a dichotomy regarding self-identified ACP decision making. There is a need for increasing SCD patient awareness and use of ACP. Further studies will help define how to address this need in SCD and similar chronically ill populations Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Author(s):  
Simon Chapman ◽  
Ben Lobo

This chapter provides an overview of the MCA’s impact on end-of-life care. It situates the MCA in the current context of policy and practice. It describes how the MCA can be used to improve care, enable people to express and protect choices, and empower and enable the professional and/or the proxy decision maker. It also presents an introduction and explanation of the role of the IMCA and how it might apply to advance care planning (ACP) and end of life decision making, and an explanation of the legal and ethical process involved in reaching best interest decisions, especially for potentially vulnerable people in care homes and other settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document