scholarly journals Ionospheric response to the interplanetary magnetic field southward turning: Fast onset and slow reconfiguration

2002 ◽  
Vol 107 (A8) ◽  
pp. SIA 2-1-SIA 2-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Lu ◽  
T. E. Holzer ◽  
D. Lummerzheim ◽  
J. M. Ruohoniemi ◽  
P. Stauning ◽  
...  
2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 782-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. Pryse ◽  
A. M. Smith ◽  
L. Kersley

Abstract. The response of the dayside ionosphere to changes in polarity of the interplanetary magnetic field was observed by two independent techniques. The signatures were seen in the 630.0 nm red-line emission, measured by a meridian scanning photometer at Ny-Ålesund on Svalbard, and also in the line-of-sight plasma velocities monitored by the Finland CUTLASS SuperDARN radar. A time difference of some 6 to 8 min occurred between the responses of the two techniques, with the flows being first to respond. In the present case study, the longer delay in the optics suggests that ion precipitation controls the auroral emission.Key words: Ionosphere (ionosphere-magnetosphere interactions) · Magnetospheric physics (magnetosphere-ionosphere interactions; polar cap phenomena)


2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 1763-1770 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Grocott ◽  
T. K. Yeoman ◽  
S. E. Milan ◽  
S. W. H. Cowley

Abstract. This paper presents the first interhemispheric radar observations interpreted as the ionospheric response to tail reconnection during IMF-northward non-substorm intervals. SuperDARN measurements of plasma convection in the nightside ionospheres of both hemispheres, taken on 21–22 February and 26–27 April 2000, show bursts of flow in the midnight sector which are understood to be characteristic of such phenomena. Upstream interplanetary magnetic field data confirm that the field orientation at the dayside magnetopause was northwards, but with a significant IMF By component (negative during the first interval, positive during the second), for many hours prior to the bursts being observed. During the By-negative interval the bursts were directed westwards in the Northern Hemisphere and eastwards in the Southern Hemisphere; during the By-positive interval their directions were reversed. These two asymmetries between the different orientations of IMF By and between the two hemispheres are key to our understanding of the magnetospheric phenomenon responsible for generating the bursts. They provide further evidence in support of the idea that the bursts are a result of reconnection in an asymmetric tail under the prolonged influence of IMF By. Concurrent data from ground magnetometers and geosynchronous satellites confirm that the bursts have no associated substorm characteristics, consistent with previous studies. Keywords. Ionosphere (Plasma convection; Ionospheremagnetosphere interactions) – Magnetospheric Physics (Magnetotail)


1996 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bremer

The Mean Solar Magnetic Field (MSMF) measured daily by ground based observations at the Standford Observatory shows similar structures like the Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) near the Earth about 5 to 7 days later. The ionospheric effect in the mid-latitude F2-region due to such MSMF changes is most marked for strong MSMF changes from anti to pro sectors. The mean ionospheric response is very similar to the results obtained earlier with IMF sector structure data derived from Svalgaard (1976) and Wilcox (1982, private communication). Therefore, the MSMF data can successfully be used to predict the mean IMF sector structure and the mean ionospheric response 5 to 7 days in advance.


1996 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bremer ◽  
J. Lastovicka ◽  
Y. Tulunay

The structure of the Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) is responsible for an essential part of the variability of the ionospheric plasma as demonstrated by investigations of the influence of IMF sector boundary crossings as well as of ?Bz-changes (defined from satellite observations) to the maximal electron density of the F2-layer at different stations in mid-latitudes. It could be shown that negative Bz-values cause distinct negative ionospheric effects. Maximal effects were detected at high geomagnetic latitudes (ionospheric response decreases with decreasing latitude), high solar/geomagnetic activity, equinoxes and night-time conditions.


2000 ◽  
Vol 105 (A10) ◽  
pp. 22955-22977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masakazu Watanabe ◽  
Natsuo Sato ◽  
Raymond A. Greenwald ◽  
Michael Pinnock ◽  
Marc R. Hairston ◽  
...  

Nature ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 318 (6045) ◽  
pp. 451-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Rishbeth ◽  
P. R. Smith ◽  
S. W. H. Cowley ◽  
D. M. Willis ◽  
A. P. van Eyken ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (10) ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Praveen Kumar Gupta ◽  
◽  
Puspraj Singh Puspraj Singh ◽  
Puspraj Singh Puspraj Singh ◽  
P. K. Chamadia P. K. Chamadia

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document