ionospheric effects
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

406
(FIVE YEARS 39)

H-INDEX

35
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Artem B. Ishin ◽  
Sergey V. Voeykov ◽  
Tatyana V. Ishina ◽  
Vicktor V. Cheremisin

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noah Francis ◽  
Brian Breitsch ◽  
Jade Morton ◽  
Joanna Hinks

Author(s):  
Haoyu Lin ◽  
Yunkai Deng ◽  
Heng Zhang ◽  
Da Liang ◽  
Tingzhu Fang ◽  
...  

GPS Solutions ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunpeng Shi ◽  
Hao Ding ◽  
Jinyun Guo ◽  
Teng Yu
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Manuel A. Cervera ◽  
Trevor J. Harris ◽  
David A. Holdsworth ◽  
David J. Netherway

2021 ◽  
Vol 503 (1) ◽  
pp. 344-353
Author(s):  
Emma Shen ◽  
Dominic Anstey ◽  
Eloy de Lera Acedo ◽  
Anastasia Fialkov ◽  
Will Handley

ABSTRACT We modelled the two major layer of Earth’s ionosphere, the F-layer and the D-layer, by a simplified spatial model with temporal variance to study the chromatic ionospheric effects on global 21-cm observations. From the analyses, we found that the magnitude of the ionospheric disruptions due to ionospheric refraction and absorption can be greater than the expected global 21-cm signal, and the variation of its magnitude can differ, depending on the ionospheric conditions. Within the parameter space adopted in the model, the shape of the global 21-cm signal is distorted after propagating through the ionosphere, while its amplitude is weakened. It is observed that the ionospheric effects do not cancel out over time, and thus should be accounted for in the foreground calibration at each timestep to account for the chromaticity introduced by the ionosphere.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 556
Author(s):  
Dehai Li ◽  
Yamin Dang ◽  
Yunbin Yuan ◽  
Jinzhong Mi

In advance of precise positioning with phase data, cycle slip detection (CSD) is a basic work that should be implemented in phase data possessing. When the cycle slip occurred, cycle slip repair (CSR) can be taken to rebuild the continuity of phase data. Unfortunately, the large pseudorange errors can contaminate the combinations with the pseudoranges and phases such as the Hatch–Melbourne–Wubbena combination (HMW) and cause false CSD or wrong CSR results. On the other hand, the severe ionospheric time variation can deteriorate the epoch-difference geometry-free phase (GF), and tremendously interfere with the performances of CSD and CSR. To handle the aforementioned limitations, a global position system (GPS) triple-frequency CSR method (GTCSR) is proposed with two efficient treatments: (1) the significant ionospheric variations are corrected, and the influences from the residual ionospheric effects are minimized along with the observational noises; and (2) the impacts of large pseudorange errors are refrained by designing a discrimination function with a geometry-free and ionosphere-free phase to identify the correct cycle slip values. Consequently, CSR tests were conducted with three monitoring stations at different regions. First, during a strong geomagnetic storm, without correcting the ionospheric variation of CSR (WICSR) displayed obvious failures, and many epochs of cycle slip values from WICSR deviated from the known values. However, the results of the GTCSR were correct, and GTCSR presented a higher success rate than that of WICSR. Furthermore, for the real triple-frequency data, by adding gross errors of 2.5 m on all epoch-difference pseudoranges epoch by epoch, the conventional triple-frequency CSR with the optimized combinations (CTCSR) and the CSD with HMW (HMWCSD) showed many mistakes, where the results of CTCSR and HMWCSD on numerous epochs were inconsistent with the actual situations, but the success rate of GTCSR was significantly higher than those of CTCSR and HMWCSD. In summary, in the condition of the cutoff elevation being larger than 10 degrees, improved performances and higher success rates were achieved from GTCSR under environments of large pseudorange errors and severe ionospheric variations.


Atmosphere ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 185
Author(s):  
Maria A. Sergeeva ◽  
Vladislav V. Demyanov ◽  
Olga A. Maltseva ◽  
Artem Mokhnatkin ◽  
Mario Rodriguez-Martinez ◽  
...  

Possible ionospheric effects of the Morelian meteoroid that passed and exploded over Mexico on 19 February 2020 (18 February 2020 local time) were estimated. The meteoroid trajectory, velocity and time of occurrence were calculated based on outdoor camera records. Modeling was used to estimate the meteoroid initial diameter, density, mass, velocity, energy and their change during its flight in the atmosphere. The ensemble of ionospheric scintillation indices calculated from the high-rate GNSS data and the filtered slant Total Electron Content data were used to reveal the presence of ionospheric disturbances generated by shock waves excited by the meteoroid flight and explosion. The first ionospheric responses to phenomena accompanying the meteoroid were detected (2.5–3.5) min after the explosion. The disturbances were attenuated quickly with distance from their source and were rarely recorded by GNSS receivers located more than 600 km from the meteoroid explosion site. The ionospheric disturbances of intermediate-scale, small-scale, shock-acoustic-wave-scale and sometimes medium-scale were revealed. The detected disturbances corresponded to the range of acoustic-gravity waves. An asymmetry of the disturbance manifestation in different directions was observed. The obtained results are in accordance with results of the observation of other meteoroids. Although the object was smaller and of less energy than other known meteoroids, it is an interesting case because, to the best of our knowledge, it isthe first known to us low-latitude meteoroid with the detected ionospheric effects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document