scholarly journals Evaluation of new GRACE time-variable gravity data over the ocean

2006 ◽  
Vol 33 (17) ◽  
Author(s):  
Don P. Chambers
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Data ◽  
Time Variable ◽  
Time Variable Gravity ◽  
Variable Gravity

scholarly journals Supporting large-scale hydrogeological monitoring and modelling by time-variable gravity data

2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Güntner ◽  
Roland Schmidt ◽  
Petra Döll
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Time Variable ◽  
Time Variable Gravity ◽  
Variable Gravity

Water Storage Changes in Three Gorges Water Systems Area Inferred from Grace Time-Variable Gravity Data

2007 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 650-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han-Sheng WANG ◽  
Zhi-Yong WANG ◽  
Xu-Dong YUAN ◽  
Patrick Wu ◽  
Elena Rangelova
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Data ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Water Systems ◽  
Time Variable ◽  
Three Gorges ◽  
Time Variable Gravity ◽  
Variable Gravity

scholarly journals Regional acceleration in ice mass loss from Greenland and Antarctica using GRACE time-variable gravity data

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (22) ◽  
pp. 8130-8137 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Velicogna ◽  
T. C. Sutterley ◽  
M. R. van den Broeke
Keyword(s):  
Mass Loss ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Time Variable ◽  
Time Variable Gravity ◽  
Variable Gravity

Spherical and ellipsoidal surface mass change from GRACE time-variable gravity data

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michal Šprlák ◽  
Khosro Ghobadi-Far ◽  
Shin-Chan Han ◽  
Pavel Novák
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Field ◽  
Gravitational Potential ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Time Variable ◽  
Mass Change ◽  
Spherical Approximation ◽  
Surface Mass ◽  
Time Variable Gravity ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Variable Gravity

<p>The problem of estimating mass redistribution from temporal variations of the Earth’s gravity field, such as those observed by GRACE, is non-unique. By approximating the Earth’s surface by a sphere, surface mass change can be uniquely determined from time-variable gravity data. Conventionally, the spherical approach of Wahr et al. (1998) is employed for computing the surface mass change caused, for example, by terrestrial water and glaciers. The accuracy of the GRACE Level 2 time-variable gravity data has improved due to updated background geophysical models or enhanced data processing. Moreover, time series analysis of ∼15 years of GRACE observations allows for determining inter-annual and seasonal changes with a significantly higher accuracy than individual monthly fields. Thus, the improved time-variable gravity data might not tolerate the spherical approximation introduced by Wahr et al. (1998).</p><p>A spheroid (an ellipsoid of revolution) represents a closer approximation of the Earth than a sphere, particularly in polar regions. Motivated by this fact, we develop a rigorous method for determining surface mass change on a spheroid. Our mathematical treatment is fully ellipsoidal as we concisely use Jacobi ellipsoidal coordinates and exploit the corresponding series expansions of the gravitational potential and of the surface mass. We provide a unique one-to-one relationship between the ellipsoidal spectrum of the surface mass and the ellipsoidal spectrum of the gravitational potential. This ellipsoidal spectral formula is more general and embeds the spherical approach by Wahr et al. (1998) as a special case. We also quantify the differences between the spherical and ellipsoidal approximations numerically by calculating the surface mass change rate in Antarctica and Greenland.</p><p> </p><p>References:</p><p>Wahr J, Molenaar M, Bryan F (1998) Time variability of the Earth’s gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 103(B12), 30205-30229.</p>

scholarly journals Evaluation of GRACE/GRACE Follow-On Time-Variable Gravity Field Models for Earthquake Detection above Mw8.0s in Spectral Domain

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (16) ◽  
pp. 3075
Author(s):  
Ming Xu ◽  
Xiaoyun Wan ◽  
Runjing Chen ◽  
Yunlong Wu ◽  
Wenbing Wang
Keyword(s):  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Time Variable ◽  
Model Errors ◽  
Signal To Noise ◽  
Time Variable Gravity ◽  
Earthquake Detection ◽  
Gravity Fields ◽  
Variable Gravity ◽  
Gravity Recovery ◽  
Gravity Field Models

This study compares the Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment (GRACE)/GRACE Follow-On (GFO) errors with the coseismic gravity variations generated by earthquakes above Mw8.0s that occurred during April 2002~June 2017 and evaluates the influence of monthly model errors on the coseismic signal detection. The results show that the precision of GFO monthly models is approximately 38% higher than that of the GRACE monthly model and all the detected earthquakes have signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) larger than 1.8. The study concludes that the precision of the time-variable gravity fields should be improved by at least one order in order to detect all the coseismic gravity signals of earthquakes with M ≥ 8.0. By comparing the spectral intensity distribution of the GFO stack errors and the 2019 Mw8.0 Peru earthquake, it is found that the precision of the current GFO monthly model meets the requirement to detect the coseismic signal of the earthquake. However, due to the limited time length of the observations and the interference of the hydrological signal, the coseismic signals are, in practice, difficult to extract currently.

scholarly journals Earth’s Time-Variable Gravity from GRACE Follow-On K-Band Range-Rates and Pseudo-Observed Orbits

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1766
Author(s):  
Igor Koch ◽  
Mathias Duwe ◽  
Jakob Flury ◽  
Akbar Shabanloui
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Field ◽  
Time Variable ◽  
Time Variable Gravity ◽  
Gravity Field Recovery ◽  
Variable Gravity ◽  
Earth’S System ◽  
Grace Mission ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
K Band

During its science phase from 2002–2017, the low-low satellite-to-satellite tracking mission Gravity Field Recovery And Climate Experiment (GRACE) provided an insight into Earth’s time-variable gravity (TVG). The unprecedented quality of gravity field solutions from GRACE sensor data improved the understanding of mass changes in Earth’s system considerably. Monthly gravity field solutions as the main products of the GRACE mission, published by several analysis centers (ACs) from Europe, USA and China, became indispensable products for quantifying terrestrial water storage, ice sheet mass balance and sea level change. The successor mission GRACE Follow-On (GRACE-FO) was launched in May 2018 and proceeds observing Earth’s TVG. The Institute of Geodesy (IfE) at Leibniz University Hannover (LUH) is one of the most recent ACs. The purpose of this article is to give a detailed insight into the gravity field recovery processing strategy applied at LUH; to compare the obtained gravity field results to the gravity field solutions of other established ACs; and to compare the GRACE-FO performance to that of the preceding GRACE mission in terms of post-fit residuals. We use the in-house-developed MATLAB-based GRACE-SIGMA software to compute unconstrained solutions based on the generalized orbit determination of 3 h arcs. K-band range-rates (KBRR) and kinematic orbits are used as (pseudo)-observations. A comparison of the obtained solutions to the results of the GRACE-FO Science Data System (SDS) and Combination Service for Time-variable Gravity Fields (COST-G) ACs, reveals a competitive quality of our solutions. While the spectral and spatial noise levels slightly differ, the signal content of the solutions is similar among all ACs. The carried out comparison of GRACE and GRACE-FO KBRR post-fit residuals highlights an improvement of the GRACE-FO K-band ranging system performance. The overall amplitude of GRACE-FO post-fit residuals is about three times smaller, compared to GRACE. GRACE-FO post-fit residuals show less systematics, compared to GRACE. Nevertheless, the power spectral density of GRACE-FO and GRACE post-fit residuals is dominated by similar spikes located at multiples of the orbital and daily frequencies. To our knowledge, the detailed origin of these spikes and their influence on the gravity field recovery quality were not addressed in any study so far and therefore deserve further attention in the future. Presented results are based on 29 monthly gravity field solutions from June 2018 until December 2020. The regularly updated LUH-GRACE-FO-2020 time series of monthly gravity field solutions can be found on the website of the International Centre for Global Earth Models (ICGEM) and in LUH’s research data repository. These operationally published products complement the time series of the already established ACs and allow for a continuous and independent assessment of mass changes in Earth’s system.

scholarly journals Decorrelated GRACE time-variable gravity solutions by GFZ, and their validation using a hydrological model

2009 ◽  
Vol 83 (10) ◽  
pp. 903-913 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Kusche ◽  
R. Schmidt ◽  
S. Petrovic ◽  
R. Rietbroek
Keyword(s):  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Time Variable ◽  
Time Variable Gravity ◽  
Variable Gravity
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document