The heat budget in the North Atlantic subtropical frontal zone

1993 ◽  
Vol 98 (C4) ◽  
pp. 6883-6893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel L. Rudnick ◽  
Robert A. Weller
1999 ◽  
Vol 104 (C1) ◽  
pp. 1377-1392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Jones ◽  
Harry Leach

2010 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 391-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.V. Veretenenko ◽  
V.A. Dergachev ◽  
P.B. Dmitriyev

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (13) ◽  
pp. 4996-5018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha W. Buckley ◽  
Rui M. Ponte ◽  
Gaël Forget ◽  
Patrick Heimbach

A recent state estimate covering the period 1992–2010 from the Estimating the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean (ECCO) project is utilized to quantify the upper-ocean heat budget in the North Atlantic on monthly to interannual time scales (seasonal cycle removed). Three novel techniques are introduced: 1) the heat budget is integrated over the maximum climatological mixed layer depth (integral denoted as H), which gives results that are relevant for explaining SST while avoiding strong contributions from vertical diffusion and entrainment; 2) advective convergences are separated into Ekman and geostrophic parts, a technique that is successful away from ocean boundaries; and 3) air–sea heat fluxes and Ekman advection are combined into one local forcing term. The central results of our analysis are as follows: 1) In the interior of subtropical gyre, local forcing explains the majority of H variance on all time scales resolved by the ECCO estimate. 2) In the Gulf Stream region, low-frequency H anomalies are forced by geostrophic convergences and damped by air–sea heat fluxes. 3) In the interior of the subpolar gyre, diffusion and bolus transports play a leading order role in H variability, and these transports are correlated with low-frequency variability in wintertime mixed layer depths.


Ocean Science ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. C. Wells ◽  
S. A. Josey ◽  
R. E. Hadfield

Abstract. The upper ocean heat budget (0–300 m) of the North Atlantic from 20°–60° N is investigated using data from Argo profiling floats for 1999–2005 and the NCEP/NCAR and NOC surface flux datasets. Estimates of the different terms in the budget (heat storage, advection, diffusion and surface exchange) are obtained using the methodology developed by Hadfield et al. (2007a, b). The method includes optimal interpolation of the individual profiles to produce gridded fields with error estimates at a 10°×10° grid box resolution. Closure of the heat budget is obtained within the error estimates for some regions – particularly the eastern subtropical Atlantic – but not for those boxes that include the Gulf Stream. Over the whole range considered, closure is obtained for 13 (9) out of 20 boxes with the NOC (NCEP/NCAR) surface fluxes. The seasonal heat budget at 20–30° N, 35–25° W is considered in detail. Here, the NCEP based budget has an annual mean residual of −55±35 Wm−2 compared with a NOC based value of −4±35 Wm−2. For this box, the net heat divergence of 36 Wm−2 (Ekman=−4 Wm−2, geostrophic=11 Wm−2, diffusion=29 Wm−2) offsets the net heating of 32 Wm−2 from the NOC surface heat fluxes. The results in this box are consistent with an earlier evaluation of the fluxes using measurements from research buoys in the subduction array which revealed biases in NCEP but good agreement of the buoy values with the NOC fields.


2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. C. Wells ◽  
S. A. Josey ◽  
R. E. Hadfield

Abstract. The upper ocean heat budget (0–300 m) of the North Atlantic from 20°–60° N is investigated using data from Argo profiling floats for 1999–2005 and the NCEP/NCAR and NOC surface flux datasets. Estimates of the different terms in the budget (heat storage, advection, diffusion and surface exchange) are obtained using the methodology developed by Hadfield et al. (2007). The method includes optimal interpolation of the individual profiles to produce gridded fields with error estimates at a 10×10 degree grid box resolution. Closure of the heat budget is obtained within the error estimates for some regions – particularly the eastern subtropical Atlantic – but not for those boxes that include the Gulf Stream. Over the whole range considered, closure is obtained for 13 (9) out of 20 boxes with the NOC (NCEP/NCAR) surface fluxes. The seasonal heat budget at 20°–30° N, 35°–25° W is considered in detail. Here, the NCEP based budget has an annual mean residual of -55±35 W m-2 compared with a NOC based value of -4±35 W m-2. For this box, the net heat divergence of 36 W m-2 (Ekman=-4 W m-2, geostrophic=11 W m-2, diffusion=29 W m-2) offsets the net heating of 32 W m-2 from the NOC surface heat fluxes. The results in this box are consistent with an earlier evaluation of the fluxes using measurements from research buoys in the subduction array which revealed biases in NCEP but good agreement of the buoy values with the NOC fields.


1995 ◽  
Vol 348 (1324) ◽  
pp. 125-132 ◽  

Knowledge of the uptake of atmospheric carbon dioxide by the North Atlantic is important in understanding the global carbon budget. Obtaining an accurate value for the ocean sinks in the northern hemisphere temperate zone, in particular, would make it possible to be more quantitative about the enigmatic land sink in these latitudes. The global ocean sink is dominated by the North Atlantic, despite its small area in comparison with the North Pacific. Of the possible methods for calculating the uptake, potentially the most informative is that based on the gas exchange equation because information about the seasonal and spatial trends can be obtained. However, there still remain serious questions about which form of the gas exchange coefficient is appropriate to carbon dioxide. Here we summarize current knowledge of the gas exchange coefficient, including recent new evidence which supports lower gas exchange rates and which, therefore, generally supports the Liss-Merlivat prediction for less soluble gases. In view of the uncertainties still surrounding the direct calculation, we investigate methods for calculating the basin-wide uptake by exploiting what is known about the general circulation of the North Atlantic. The uptake can be estimated by dividing it into pre-industrial steady state and anthropogenic contributions. We make a new estimate of the pre-industrial flux based on the heat budget of the North Atlantic, and also consider two earlier calculations of the same quantity. Taking a best value, adding the better-known anthropogenic flux and making small corrections, we find a value of 0.7± 0.15 Gt C a -1 for the uptake of the North Atlantic, north of 15° N, in the mid 1980s. Though larger than the gas exchange based estimates of Tans et al. (1990), this value is not enough to obviate the need which they deduced for a sizeable ‘land-based’ northern hemisphere sink for CO 2 .


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document