Identification of a Possible Seismic Gap Near Unalaska Island, Eastern Aleutians, Alaska

2013 ◽  
pp. 81-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. S. House ◽  
L. R. Sykes ◽  
J. N. Davies ◽  
K. H. Jacob
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Gap

Estimation of site response functions for the central seismic gap of Himalaya, India

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjali Sharma ◽  
Renu Yadav ◽  
Dinesh Kumar ◽  
Ajay Paul ◽  
S. S. Teotia
Keyword(s):  
Site Response ◽  
Seismic Gap ◽  
Response Functions ◽  
Central Seismic Gap

scholarly journals Plate Coupling Mechanism of the Central Andes Subduction: Insight from Gravity Model

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-21
Author(s):  
Rezene Mahatsente
Keyword(s):  
Subduction Zone ◽  
Continental Crust ◽  
Gravity Model ◽  
Central Andes ◽  
High Density ◽  
Seismic Gap ◽  
Coupling Mechanism ◽  
Crust And Upper Mantle ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Plate Coupling

Abstract The Central Andes experienced major earthquake (Mw =8.2) in April 2014 in a region where the giant 1877 earthquake (Mw=8.8) occurred. The 2014 Iquique earthquake did not break the entire seismic gap zones as previously predicted. Geodetic and seismological observations indicate a highly coupled plate interface. To assess the locking mechanism of plate interfaces beneath Central Andes, a 2.5-D gravity model of the crust and upper mantle structure of the central segment of the subduction zone was developed based on terrestrial and satellite gravity data from the LAGEOS, GRACE and GOCE satellite missions. The densities and major structures of the gravity model are constrained by velocity models from receiver function and seismic tomography. The gravity model defined details of crustal and slab structure necessary to understand the cause of megathrust asperity generation. The densities of the upper and lower crust in the fore-arc (2970 – 3000 kg m−3) are much higher than the average density of continental crust. The high density bodies are interpreted as plutonic or ophiolitic structures emplaced onto continental crust. The plutonic or ophiolitic structures may be exerting pressure on the Nazca slab and lock the plate interfaces beneath the Central Andes subduction zone. Thus, normal pressure exerted by high density fore-arc structures and buoyancy force may control plate coupling in the Central Andes. However, this interpretation does not exclude other possible factors controlling plate coupling in the Central Andes. Seafloor roughness and variations in pore-fluid pressure in sediments along subduction channel can affect plate coupling and asperity generation.

Fitting copulas to bivariate earthquake data: the seismic gap hypothesis revisited

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aristidis K. Nikoloulopoulos ◽  
Dimitris Karlis
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Gap ◽  
Earthquake Data

A seismic gap past and future

Eos ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 69 (17) ◽  
pp. 545
Author(s):  
William Ward Maggs
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Gap

Absence of strain accumulation in the Shumagin Seismic Gap, Alaska, 1980–1987

1988 ◽  
Vol 93 (B7) ◽  
pp. 7909 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lisowski ◽  
J. C. Savage ◽  
W. H. Prescott ◽  
W. K. Gross
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Gap ◽  
Strain Accumulation

Near-Fault Monitoring Reveals Combined Seismic and Slow Activation of a Fault Branch within the Istanbul–Marmara Seismic Gap in Northwest Turkey

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Martínez-Garzón ◽  
Virginie Durand ◽  
Stephan Bentz ◽  
Grzegorz Kwiatek ◽  
Georg Dresen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Gap ◽  
Marmara Region ◽  
Fault Rupture ◽  
Aseismic Slip ◽  
Near Fault ◽  
Fault Monitoring ◽  
Aftershock Sequences ◽  
Borehole Strainmeter ◽  
Seismic Moment Release ◽  
Fluid Diffusion

Abstract Various geophysical observations show that seismic and aseismic slip on a fault may occur concurrently. We analyze microseismicity recordings from a temporary near-fault seismic network and borehole strainmeter data from the eastern Marmara region in northwest Turkey to track seismic and aseismic deformation around the hypocentral region of an Mw 4.5 earthquake in 2018. A slow transient is observed that lasted about 30 days starting at the time of the Mw 4.5 event. We study about 1200 microseismic events that occurred during 417 days after the Mw 4.5 event around the mainshock fault rupture. The seismicity reveals a strong temporal clustering, including four episodic seismic sequences, each containing more than 30 events per day. Seismicity from the first two sequences displayed typical characteristics driven by aseismic slip and/or fluids, such as the activation of a broader region around the mainshock and swarm-like topology. The third and fourth sequences correspond to typical mainshock–aftershock sequences. These observations suggest that slow slip and potentially fluid diffusion along the fault plane could have controlled the seismicity during the initial 150 days following the Mw 4.5 event. In contrast, stress redistribution and breaking of remaining asperities may have caused the activity after the initial 150 days. Our observation from a newly installed combined dense seismic and borehole strainmeter network follows an earlier observation of a slow transient occurring in conjunction with enhanced local seismic moment release in the same region. This suggests a frequent interaction of seismic and aseismic slip in the Istanbul–Marmara seismic gap.

Complex Slip Distribution of the 2021 Mw 7.4 Maduo, China, Earthquake: An Event Occurring on the Slowly Slipping Fault

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rumeng Guo ◽  
Hongfeng Yang ◽  
Yu Li ◽  
Yong Zheng ◽  
Lupeng Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Slip Rate ◽  
Slip Distribution ◽  
Seismic Gap ◽  
Seismogenic Fault ◽  
Coseismic Slip ◽  
Slip Rates ◽  
Kunlun Mountain ◽  
Coulomb Failure ◽  
Main Fault ◽  
Large Earthquakes

Abstract The 21 May 2021 Maduo earthquake occurred on the Kunlun Mountain Pass–Jiangcuo fault (KMPJF), a seismogenic fault with no documented large earthquakes. To probe its kinematics, we first estimate the slip rates of the KMPJF and Tuosuo Lake segment (TLS, ∼75 km north of the KMPJF) of the East Kunlun fault (EKLF) based on the secular Global Positioning System (GPS) data using the Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Our model reveals that the slip rates of the KMPJF and TLS are 1.7 ± 0.8 and 7.1 ± 0.3 mm/yr, respectively. Then, we invert high-resolution GPS and Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar observations to decipher the fault geometry and detailed coseismic slip distribution associated with the Maduo earthquake. The geometry of the KMPFJ significantly varies along strike, composed of five fault subsegments. The most slip is accommodated by two steeply dipping fault segments, with the patch of large sinistral slip concentrated in the shallow depth on a simple straight structure. The released seismic moment is ∼1.5×1020  N·m, equivalent to an Mw 7.39 event, with a peak slip of ∼9.3 m. Combining the average coseismic slip and slip rate of the main fault, an earthquake recurrence period of ∼1250−400+1120  yr is estimated. The Maduo earthquake reminds us to reevaluate the potential of seismic gaps where slip rates are low. Based on our calculated Coulomb failure stress, the Maduo earthquake imposes positive stress on the Maqin–Maqu segment of the EKLF, a long-recognized seismic gap, implying that it may accelerate the occurrence of the next major event in this region.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document