Eye movement control in reading: The role of word boundaries.

Author(s):  
Alexander Pollatsek ◽  
Keith Rayner
2009 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 934-947 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masafumi Ohki ◽  
Hiromasa Kitazawa ◽  
Takahito Hiramatsu ◽  
Kimitake Kaga ◽  
Taiko Kitamura ◽  
...  

The anatomical connection between the frontal eye field and the cerebellar hemispheric lobule VII (H-VII) suggests a potential role of the hemisphere in voluntary eye movement control. To reveal the involvement of the hemisphere in smooth pursuit and saccade control, we made a unilateral lesion around H-VII and examined its effects in three Macaca fuscata that were trained to pursue visually a small target. To the step (3°)-ramp (5–20°/s) target motion, the monkeys usually showed an initial pursuit eye movement at a latency of 80–140 ms and a small catch-up saccade at 140–220 ms that was followed by a postsaccadic pursuit eye movement that roughly matched the ramp target velocity. After unilateral cerebellar hemispheric lesioning, the initial pursuit eye movements were impaired, and the velocities of the postsaccadic pursuit eye movements decreased. The onsets of 5° visually guided saccades to the stationary target were delayed, and their amplitudes showed a tendency of increased trial-to-trial variability but never became hypo- or hypermetric. Similar tendencies were observed in the onsets and amplitudes of catch-up saccades. The adaptation of open-loop smooth pursuit velocity, tested by a step increase in target velocity for a brief period, was impaired. These lesion effects were recognized in all directions, particularly in the ipsiversive direction. A recovery was observed at 4 wk postlesion for some of these lesion effects. These results suggest that the cerebellar hemispheric region around lobule VII is involved in the control of smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements.


2008 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 934-947 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ohki ◽  
H. Kitazawa ◽  
T. Hiramatsu ◽  
K. Kaga ◽  
T. Kitamura ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 675-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph Radach ◽  
Lynn Huestegge ◽  
Ronan Reilly

1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 680-681
Author(s):  
K. Doré-Mazars

This commentary focuses on Findlay & Walker's model and more specifically, on its underestimation of the role of cognitive processes in eye movement control during complex activities such as text scanning. In particular, the issue of the complexity of the subject's task/behavior is discussed to stress the importance of the link between selection for perceptual processing on the one hand, and the selection of a target for a saccade, on the other. Future models will have to account for the fact that the goal of any saccade is to bring the eyes to a relevant object and that the selection of this saccade target is closely related to object recognition.


2008 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 250-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahito Hiramatsu ◽  
Masafumi Ohki ◽  
Hiromasa Kitazawa ◽  
Guoxiang Xiong ◽  
Taiko Kitamura ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1012-1018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Helmchen ◽  
Jonas Pohlmann ◽  
Peter Trillenberg ◽  
Rebekka Lencer ◽  
Julia Graf ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 695-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Pollatsek ◽  
Keith Rayner

We are largely in agreement with the Findlay & Walker model. However, they appear to dismiss the role of covert spatial attention in tasks in which people are free to move their eyes. We argue that an account of the facts about the perceptual span in reading requires a window of attention not centered around the fovea. Moreover, a computational model of reading that we (Reichle et al. 1998) developed gives a good account of eye movement control in reading and would be unable to do so without relying heavily on covert attention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document