"Choice processing in emotionally difficult decisions": Correction.

1998 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 861-861
Author(s):  
Mary Frances Luce ◽  
James R. Bettman ◽  
John W. Payne
Keyword(s):  
Choice Processing

Multimodal Measures of the Energetic Demands of Information Processing in a Suboptimal Environment

1993 ◽  
Vol 37 (19) ◽  
pp. 1393-1397
Author(s):  
Arthur M. Ryan ◽  
Richard W. Backs
Keyword(s):  
Feature Extraction ◽  
Information Processing ◽  
Visual Memory ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Processing Stage ◽  
Allocation Policy ◽  
Response Choice ◽  
Variable Capacity ◽  
Auditory Noise ◽  
Choice Processing

Twenty-four male volunteers participated in a study in which the feature extraction and response choice information processing stages of a visual memory task and the environment in which the task was performed were manipulated in order to assess the specificity of energetic demands. Ambient auditory noise was a state variable that was predicted to directly affect the energetic mechanism supporting the feature extraction processing stage and to indirectly affect the energetic mechanism supporting the response choice processing stage. Several classes of dependent measures were taken including performance, cardiovascular, pulmonary, and metabolic in order to isolate effects upon energetic mechanisms. The present study did not support the proposition of multiple energetic mechanisms. Instead, the combination of a single variable-capacity energetic resource with a flexible allocation policy to the processing stages was a better fit to the results.

The Effects of Concurrent Verbalization on Choice Processing

1989 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Biehal ◽  
Dipankar Chakravarti
Keyword(s):  
Concurrent Verbalization ◽  
Choice Processing

Heading south with a north-up map: A choice processing analysis of map alignment effects

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Tlauka ◽  
Melissa Prince ◽  
Louis Sullivan ◽  
Jason S. McCarley
Keyword(s):  
Map Alignment ◽  
Choice Processing

Choice processing in emotionally difficult decisions.

1997 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 384-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Frances Luce ◽  
James R. Bettman ◽  
John W. Payne
Keyword(s):  
Choice Processing

scholarly journals Tourist Choice Processing: Evaluating Decision Rules and Methods of Their Measurement

2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 699-711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunxiao Li ◽  
Scott McCabe ◽  
Haiyan Song
Keyword(s):  
Explanatory Power ◽  
Decision Rules ◽  
Preference Order ◽  
Consumption Behavior ◽  
Evaluation Indicator ◽  
Innovative Method ◽  
Tourism Studies ◽  
Out Of Sample ◽  
Managerial Implications ◽  
Choice Processing

A detailed understanding of decision rules is essential in order to better explain consumption behavior, yet the variety of decision rules used have been somewhat neglected in tourism research. This study adopts an innovative method, greedoid analysis, to estimate a noncompensatory type of decision rule known as lexicographic by aspect (LBA). It is quite different from the weighted additive (WADD) model commonly assumed in tourism studies. By utilizing an experimental research design, this study enables the evaluation of the two types of decision rules regarding their predictive and explanatory power. Additionally, we introduce a novel evaluation indicator (“cost”), which allows further investigation of the heterogeneity in the use of decision rules. The results suggest that although the out-of-sample accuracy is lower, the LBA model has a better explanatory performance on respondents’ preference order. Moreover, the different perspective provided by the LBA model is useful for obtaining managerial implications.

The Effects of Concurrent Verbalization on Choice Processing

1989 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Biehal ◽  
Dipankar Chakravarti
Keyword(s):  
Product Information ◽  
Verbal Protocol ◽  
Problem Framing ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Concurrent Verbalization ◽  
Task Perception ◽  
Initial Choice ◽  
Choice Processing ◽  
And Task

Subjects made an initial choice using external product information. Some concurrently verbalized this choice, whereas others did not. Next, they received more information on new brands and a new attribute for all brands. Both verbalizers and nonverbalizers then made a second choice using some of the first choice information incidentally acquired in memory. All subjects verbalized this second choice. The effects of the first choice verbalization manipulation were examined by analyzing the second choice protocols along with the choice outcome and task perception measures. In comparison with verbalizers, nonverbalizers did more problem framing and brand processing during earlier phases of the second choice. However, choice outcomes did not differ. The findings suggest that the verbalization manipulation may have altered the first choice, creating memory differences that affected some subsequent tasks. Retrieval measures corroborate this conclusion. The concurrent verbal protocol method is evaluated on the basis of these findings.

Think it through before making a choice? Processing mode does not influence social mindfulness

2018 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 85-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorothee Mischkowski ◽  
Isabel Thielmann ◽  
Andreas Glöckner
Keyword(s):  
Processing Mode ◽  
Choice Processing

Hybrid Bishop-Hill model combined finite element analysis for elastic-yield limited design

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1814-1836
Author(s):  
Ribeka Takahashi ◽  
David T. Fullwood ◽  
Travis M. Rampton ◽  
Darrell J. Skousen ◽  
Brent L. Adams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Material Anisotropy ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Hill Model ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Local Stresses ◽  
Material Choice ◽  
Practical Tool ◽  
Choice Processing

Purpose – Microstructure-sensitive design (MSD), for optimal performance of engineering components that are sensitive to material anisotropy, has largely been confined to the realm of theory. The purpose of this paper is to insert the MSD framework into a finite element environment in order to arrive at a practical tool for improved selection and design of materials for critical engineering situations. Design/methodology/approach – This study applies the recently developed Hybrid Bishop-Hill (HBH) model to map the yield surface of anisotropic oxygen free electronic copper. Combining this information with the detailed local stresses determined via finite element analysis (FEA), a “configurational yield stress” is determined for the entire component. By varying the material choice/processing conditions and selecting the directionality of anisotropy, an optimal configuration is found. Findings – The paper provides a new FEA-based framework for MSD for yield-limited situations. The approach identified optimal directionality and processing configurations for three engineering situations that are particularly sensitive to material anisotropy. Research limitations/implications – The microstructure design space for this study is limited to a selection of eight copper materials produced by a range of processing methods, but is generalizable to many materials that exhibit anisotropic behavior. Originality/value – The introduction of MSD methodology into a finite element environment is a first step toward a comprehensive designer toolkit for exploiting the anisotropy of general materials (such as metals) in a way that is routinely undertaken in the world of fiber-based composite materials. While the gains are not as sizeable (due to the less-extreme anisotropy), in many applications they may be extremely important.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document