Patient dropout from a couples' group treatment for panic disorder with agoraphobia.

1995 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 626-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele M. Carter ◽  
Julia Turovsky ◽  
Tracy Sbrocco ◽  
Elizabeth A. Meadows ◽  
David H. Barlow
2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claude Bélanger ◽  
Catherine Courchesne ◽  
Andrea G. Leduc ◽  
Caroline Dugal ◽  
Ghassan El-Baalbaki ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen J. Teng ◽  
Terri L. Barrera ◽  
Emily L. Hiatt ◽  
Angelic D. Chaison ◽  
Nancy Jo Dunn ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Perreault ◽  
Dominic Julien ◽  
Noé Djawn White ◽  
Claude Bélanger ◽  
André Marchand ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 16???24 ◽  
Author(s):  
LINDA M. NAGY ◽  
JOHN H. KRYSTAL ◽  
DENNIS S. CHARNEY ◽  
KATHLEEN R. MERIKANGAS ◽  
SCOTT W. WOODS

2007 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 409-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferdinando Galassi ◽  
Silvia Quercioli ◽  
Diana Charismas ◽  
Valentina Niccolai ◽  
Elisabetta Barciulli

Author(s):  
Darlene Williamson

Given the potential of long term intervention to positively influence speech/language and psychosocial domains, a treatment protocol was developed at the Stroke Comeback Center which addresses communication impairments arising from chronic aphasia. This article presents the details of this program including the group purposes and principles, the use of technology in groups, and the applicability of a group program across multiple treatment settings.


Crisis ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 451-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan S. Chesin ◽  
Beth S. Brodsky ◽  
Brandon Beeler ◽  
Christopher A. Benjamin-Phillips ◽  
Ida Taghavi ◽  
...  

Abstract. Background: Few investigations of patient perceptions of suicide prevention interventions exist, limiting our understanding of the processes and components of treatment that may be engaging and effective for high suicide-risk patients. Aims: Building on promising quantitative data that showed that adjunct mindfulness-based cognitive therapy to prevent suicidal behavior (MBCT-S) reduced suicidal thinking and depression among high suicide-risk patients, we subjected MBCT-S to qualitative inspection by patient participants. Method: Data were provided by 15 patients who completed MBCT-S during a focus group and/or via a survey. Qualitative data were coded using thematic analysis. Themes were summarized using descriptive analysis. Results: Most patients viewed the intervention as acceptable and feasible. Patients attributed MBCT-S treatment engagement and clinical improvement to improved emotion regulation. A minority of patients indicated that factors related to the group treatment modality were helpful. A small percentage of patients found that aspects of the treatment increased emotional distress and triggered suicidal thinking. These experiences, however, were described as fleeting and were not linked to suicidal behavior. Limitations: The sample size was small. Conclusion: Information gathered from this study may assist in refining MBCT-S and treatments to prevent suicidal behavior among high suicide-risk patients generally.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document