Measuring reinforcer efficacy: Does relative persistence do it? Comment on Meisch (2000).

2000 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 350-351
Author(s):  
Marc N. Branch
1998 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Weavers ◽  
T. Mary Foster ◽  
William Temple

1931 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 433-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred O. Tonney ◽  
Ralph E. Noble
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek D. Reed ◽  
James K. Luiselli ◽  
Jennifer D. Magnuson ◽  
Stefanie Fillers ◽  
Shawn Vieira ◽  
...  

Behaviour ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 92 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 129-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-Joachim Mosler

Males of Haplochromis burtoni have ritualized fights with physical contact and they assess the relative persistence of their opponents by their reactions, following their own behavior patterns. For this the fighter has to know which reactions have a typical winner or loser meaning and thus which reactions could point at more or less persistence. I evaluated the meanings out of a preliminary data sample of 27 fights by calculating information values, with a formula developed, for each reaction in each fighting stage. In general, it seems that Displaying Long, that is, being Rammed for a long time has a typical winner meaning, indicating more persistence. The hypothetical reactions were tested with a second sample. In 20 out of 23 fights the number of typical winner reactions of the winner is greater, up to the last fighting stage. Because this difference is only in the last fighting stage significant, I postulated a "Critical Fighting Stage". The fighter comes into this stage when he feels a little weariness. From this stage on, and not before, his assessment of his opponent should become relevant for him. A fighter with this strategy has three advantages : 1. Each bluff will be ineffective if it does not happen in the "Critical Fighting Stage". Therefore, a fighter should by no means show he is in this stage. 2. A fighter cannot give any information about how long he will fight, because he does not know it himself. 3. He does not know it himself because he adapts his persistence to the fighting of his opponent. ` The results brought the following new aspects to sociobiological hypotheses: 1. A bimodal function of the ESS nearly agreed with the frequency distribution of the duration of 50 fights. I tried to describe the suitable penalty function on the basis of my observations. 2. I found that the assessment improved with the fighting stages. Therefore, the information acquired in each stage is not constant. 3. The concept of the "Critical Fighting Stage" allows for the best adaptation of a fighter's persistence to the fighting of his opponent.


2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole M. Trosclair-Lasserre ◽  
Dorothea C. Lerman ◽  
Nathan A. Call ◽  
Laura R. Addison ◽  
Tiffany Kodak

1963 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duncan Macrae

Among the causes of the demise of the Fourth Republic, one prominently mentioned has been the incapacity of governments to govern. Not merely cabinet instability as such, but the association of premiers' popularity in the Assembly with their disinclination toward bold policy innovations, is the charge. Stability indeed there was: continuity of ministers under changing cabinets, relative persistence of cabinets (such as those of Queuille and Mollet) that maintained the existing political balance or even defended the Assembly against innovation. Stability, too, of policy: the continuation of the Indo-Chinese war and the Algerian war, for example, long after a policy change might have been considered. Underlying this sometimes artificial stability was the threat that an innovating premier or minister might soon find himself returned to the status of an ordinary denuty.


1992 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laszlo Lugosi

The relative persistence capacity in mouse spleen of 10 and 9 BCG substrains from liquid and dried vaccines, respectively, was evaluated in two studies. Recoverable BCG colony counts from mouse spleen were determined at given days on solid medium in the two studies during a period of 1–360 and 1–345 days, respectively, after the intravenous BCG vaccination, performed with two different viable units. From 36 000 (study 1) and 21 600 (study 2) recoverable BCG colony counts, 180 and 108 mean relative persistence capacity values were estimated to test the residual virulence during the follow-up time, using computerized statistical analysis. The early and late trends of mean relative persistence capacity of the BCG substrains in mouse spleen were tested by linear regression analysis and analysis of variance and covariance; then with ranked adjusted group mean relative persistence capacity, Gabriel's simultaneous test procedure was performed for multiple comparison to diminish type 1 error in statistical inference and in objective interpretation of the experimental results. The associations of the ranked mean relative persistence capacity of the BCG substrains at the different sacrifice days of mice were also analyzed by Kendall's test of concordance. The early, late, and overall relative persistence capacity reflects the residual virulence of the BCG substrains and provides information on the required protective efficacy (immunogenicity) and adverse reactions (reactogenicity), allowing the appropriate vaccination dose, expressed in viable units of the substrain used, to be determined. Key words: BCG substrains, residual virulence, relative persistence in mouse spleen, multiple comparison.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document