Similarity of relationship standards, couple communication patterns, and marital satisfaction among Chinese couples.

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 806-816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peilian Chi ◽  
Norman B. Epstein ◽  
Xiaoyi Fang ◽  
Debbie O. B. Lam ◽  
Xiaoming Li

Author(s):  
Caroline Dugal ◽  
Audrey Brassard ◽  
Aurélie Claing ◽  
Audrey-Ann Lefebvre ◽  
Ariane Audet ◽  
...  


2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 530-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah June Carroll ◽  
E. Jeffrey Hill ◽  
Jeremy B. Yorgason ◽  
Jeffry H. Larson ◽  
Jonathan G. Sandberg


PSYCHOLOGIA ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji YOKOTANI




2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 168-141
Author(s):  
Shima Moghadasali ◽  
Malek Mirhashemi ◽  
Nasrin Bagheri


2009 ◽  
pp. 63-85
Author(s):  
Silvia Mazzoni ◽  
Liliana Caravelli ◽  
Fernando Cosimi

- The study examined communication features of couples with a alcoholic partner. Two groups were compared (N = 58): alcoholic subjects with experience of intimate partners violence (A.V.=29) and alcoholic subjects that don't experience IPV (A.N.V.=29). The CPQ was administered to asses dyadic communication patterns and the Scheme of Analysis of histories of couple violence was used to evaluate risk factors of IPV. A.V. group showed significantly higher levels of negative communication, i.e. demand/withdraw pattern, than did other group. Furthermore, the groups significantly differ to violence against familiars and unfamiliars. Research and clinical implications are discussed. Key words: couple violence; alcoholism; couple communication; demand/ withdraw pattern.



2021 ◽  
pp. 43-55
Author(s):  
Sedigheh HasaniMoghadam ◽  
Jila Ganji ◽  
Hamid Sharif Nia ◽  
Mohsen Aarabi ◽  
Soghra Khani

Background: Given the effect of various factors on the use of communication patterns by couples, this study aimed to determine the most common communication pattern among couples and related factors in Sari, northern Iran. Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 520 people (260 couples) in Sari. Data were collected using a demographic–fertility factors questionnaire, Enrich couple scale, communication patterns questionnaire, general health questionnaire (GHQ-28), and NEO personality inventory. Data analysis was performed in SPSS version 25 using descriptive and inferential statistics (multiple regression model). Results: While the mean (standard deviation) age of women included in the study was 34.08 (7.71) years, the mean age of men was 39.13 (9.18) years. The most common communication patterns in both women and men was the mutual constructive communication, whereas the lowest frequent communication pattern was the demand/withdraw communication in both men and women. Marital satisfaction had a significant positive correlation with mutual constructive communication pattern in women and men (P = 0.001). In addition, a significant inverse correlation was observed between the number of marriage to date, women’s age, and spouses' demand/withdraw communication pattern with mutual constructive communication pattern in women. Also, a significant inverse correlation was observed between flexibility (P = 0.047), number of marriages (P = 0.013), and the wives' age (P = 0.005) with mutual constructive communication pattern in men. Conclusion: According to the results of the study, it is necessary to recognize the factors related to couples’ communication patterns in order to improve the communication patterns so that marital conflicts could be avoided while a more effective communication is established.  Keywords: communication patterns, couples, personality characteristics, marital satisfaction, public health





Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document