Beyond destructive and constructive interparental conflict: Children’s psychological vulnerability to interparental disorganization.

2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (12) ◽  
pp. 2192-2205
Author(s):  
Patrick T. Davies ◽  
Joanna K. Pearson ◽  
Jesse L. Coe ◽  
Rochelle F. Hentges ◽  
Melissa L. Sturge-Apple
Diagnostica ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mechtild Gödde ◽  
Sabine Walper

Zusammenfassung.Die Children’s Perception of Interparental Conflict Scale (CPIC) von Grych, Seid und Fincham (1992) ist ein in der amerikanischen Forschung inzwischen gut etabliertes Fragebogenverfahren zur Erfassung elterlicher Konflikte aus der Sicht der betroffenen Kinder. Neben eher “objektiven“ äußeren Merkmalen des Konflikts wird auch die subjektive Bewertung der Kinder hinsichtlich der Ursachen und Bedeutsamkeit der elterlichen Auseinandersetzungen erfasst. Mit der vorliegenden Arbeit wird eine Kurzversion des CPIC vorgestellt, die an einer Stichprobe von 335 Kindern und Jugendlichen getestet wurde. Die Analysen hinsichtlich Dimensionalität, Reliabilität und Validität belegen die Güte der deutschen Fassung des CPIC. Der Fragebogen weist eine dreidimensionale Struktur auf mit den gegenüber dem amerikanischen Original inhaltlich etwas abweichend akzentuierten SkalenKonfliktpersistenz, Kind als Konfliktanlass und Kind als Vermittler.


2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-258
Author(s):  
Natasha S. Seiter ◽  
Rachel G. Lucas-Thompson ◽  
Dan J. Graham

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin-Xin Wang ◽  
Kai Dou ◽  
Jian Bin Li ◽  
Ming-Chen Zhang ◽  
Ji-Yao Guan

Although interparental conflict is a risk factor for adolescent problematic internet use (PIU), little research has investigated the mediating and moderating mechanisms underlying this association from the perspective of "school × family" interplay. To address such gaps, this study tested the idea that interparental conflict might be associated with PIU in adolescents via restraining the protective effect of future positive time perspective and via boosting deleterious effect of future negative time perspective. In addition, this study also investigated the moderation effect of teacher-student relationship in the association between interparental conflict and future time perspective. Using three-wave longitudinal data, with each time point spanning three months apart, this study examined the aforesaid questions in a sample of 523 Chinese adolescents (M age = 14.64, SD = 1.37; 276 boys and 247 girls). Results of moderated mediation model indicated that interparental conflict at T1 was associated with PIU at T3 in adolescents through future negative time perspective at T2, especially for adolescents with a great teacher-student relationship. These findings shed light on the underlying mechanisms that explain how interparental conflict is associated with PIU in adolescents and provide effective prevention and intervention strategies of PIU in a Chinese cultural context


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 1016-1036
Author(s):  
Mengyu Miranda Gao ◽  
Aryanne D. de Silva ◽  
E. Mark Cummings ◽  
Patrick T. Davies

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-66
Author(s):  
Simo K Määttä ◽  
Eeva Puumala ◽  
Riitta Ylikomi

This article analyzes three video-recorded asylum interviews, their written records and the corresponding decisions by the Finnish Immigration Service. The goal is to identify the causes and consequences of vulnerability in instances that are particularly important when assessing whether the asylum seeker has a well-grounded fear of persecution. A combination of linguistic, psychological and epistemic perspectives on vulnerability shows that these three dimensions are closely intertwined in asylum interviews. Linguistic vulnerability is linked for the most part to interpreting, whereas psychological vulnerability stems from the difficulty in recounting traumatic experiences. Both linguistic and psychological vulnerabilities are central forces that also lead to epistemic vulnerability. Epistemic vulnerability, we claim, gives rise to certain practices within the asylum procedure, which again represents the materialization of the discourses of reporting, truth and credibility.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document