Graduate student committee report: Constructing a psychoanalytic training experience in graduate school

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy J. Zeddies
2020 ◽  
pp. 43-53
Author(s):  
Vladimir Sergeevich Malyshev ◽  

Introduction to the problem. The relevance of the analysis of the environment of a graduate student from the position of searching for a pedagogical means of managing his formation as a highly qualified specialist is due to the multidimensional goals and objectives of postgraduate training, which are based on the conditions of real life. The purpose of the article is to identify and justify the functional and predictive model of the environment of students in graduate school as a means of scientific and scientific-pedagogical training of highly qualified personnel. The methodology of the study. Theoretical bases of the description of a model of students in graduate school made presentation on environmental design, as part of a technology of the environmental approach in education, as well as theoretical and practical experience of understanding the way of life as a condition of personality during the educational process. An important role was played by the results of the study of the use of information and communication technologies as a system-forming factor in the training of highly qualified personnel in graduate school, conducted by the author since 2017. Results and conclusion. The environment of students in graduate school is presented as an integral tool that includes the parameters of the possibility, probability and reliability of achieving an educational goal in the environment and with the help of the environment. These parameters are revealed in the course of a sequential solution of nine tasks to describe the environment of students in graduate school, based on the rules of combining parts of the environmental approach in order to realize the educational potential inherent in it. The way of life of a graduate student is considered as a condition for becoming a highly qualified specialist with scientific and scientific-pedagogical training as a result of the interaction of the student with the environment.


2010 ◽  
Vol 43 (03) ◽  
pp. 557-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward M. Burmila

AbstractDespite being responsible for a large percentage of undergraduate instruction, graduate students often receive little preparation for their first solo teaching assignments (J. D. Nyquist et al.,Change31 (3): 18, 1999). Furthermore, the existing literature on pedagogy fails to address the unique challenges faced by graduate students who are asked to serve as course instructors rather than teaching assistants. This article presents seven pieces of advice intended to better prepare the predoctoral graduate student to assume the role of the professor before assuming the title. By understanding the attitudes of undergraduate students toward graduate instructors, preparing in advance to handle the mistakes that novice teachers often make, and recognizing the correlation between outward confidence and student perceptions of instructor quality, graduate students can derive the most benefit from a stressful and time-consuming assignment. Most important, graduate instructors can learn to effectively manage the time spent on teaching duties to ensure that other responsibilities such as coursework, qualifying exams, and dissertation research do not suffer.


Author(s):  
Семен Резник ◽  
Semen Reznik

Examines the content, system and technology training in graduate school, preparing for independent scientific activities, methodology of scientific work, and gives recommendations for the writing, preparation and defense of a thesis. Much attention is paid to the preparation of a graduate student to work at the Department of the University, the organization and planning of his life and work. For graduate students and degree applicants, as well as for students who want to devote themselves to research and teaching.


1972 ◽  
Vol 5 (04) ◽  
pp. 432-435
Author(s):  
William C. Yoels

As any recent Ph.D. recipient can attest, the writing of a doctoral dissertation is at times a process fraught with uncertainty and anxiety over the “meaning” of one's work and its implications for the growth of knowledge in the discipline. The dissertation usually marks the first opportunity for a graduate student to exercise a great deal of independence and autonomy on a research project of one's own choosing; and the successful defense of the completed dissertation represents the final phase in a socialization process designed to initiate the newcomer into the sacred “holies” of academic folkways and mores.From its inception in 1861, when Yale became the first American university to grant the Ph.D. degree, the doctoral degree was viewed as a “research degree” and the writing of a dissertation was justified in terms of making an “original contribution” to the scholar's own discipline. A casual glance through several recent graduate school catalogues indicates that the official rhetoric concerning the dissertation continues to stress the notion of an “original contribution.”


2014 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 1211-1233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Schneider ◽  
Douglas Wilkerson ◽  
Brenda Solomon ◽  
Caryl Perlman ◽  
Denise Duval Tsioles ◽  
...  

1980 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 168-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul E. Delfin ◽  
Michael C. Roberts

This repeated measures study pioneers into the realm of students' self assessment of graduate training experience effectiveness.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document