Hospitals serving the uninsured and underserved need help with public reporting and pay-for-performance measures

2008 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 140 (5) ◽  
pp. S-1014-S-1015
Author(s):  
Anjali S. Kumar ◽  
Lana Bijelic ◽  
Kirthi Kolli ◽  
Kimberly N. Hoang ◽  
Shafik Sidani ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Poldrugovac ◽  
J E Amuah ◽  
H Wei-Randall ◽  
P Sidhom ◽  
K Morris ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Evidence of the impact of public reporting of healthcare performance on quality improvement is not yet sufficient to draw conclusions with certainty, despite the important policy implications. This study explored the impact of implementing public reporting of performance indicators of long-term care facilities in Canada. The objective was to analyse whether improvements can be observed in performance measures after publication. Methods We considered 16 performance indicators in long-term care in Canada, 8 of which are publicly reported at a facility level, while the other 8 are privately reported. We analysed data from the Continuing Care Reporting System managed by the Canadian Institute for Health Information and based on information collection with RAI-MDS 2.0 © between the fiscal years 2011 and 2018. A multilevel model was developed to analyse time trends, before and after publication, which started in 2015. The analysis was also stratified by key sample characteristics, such as the facilities' jurisdiction, size, urban or rural location and performance prior to publication. Results Data from 1087 long-term care facilities were included. Among the 8 publicly reported indicators, the trend in the period after publication did not change significantly in 5 cases, improved in 2 cases and worsened in 1 case. Among the 8 privately reported indicators, no change was observed in 7, and worsening in 1 indicator. The stratification of the data suggests that for those indicators that were already improving prior to public reporting, there was either no change in trend or there was a decrease in the rate of improvement after publication. For those indicators that showed a worsening trend prior to public reporting, the contrary was observed. Conclusions Our findings suggest public reporting of performance data can support change. The trends of performance indicators prior to publication appear to have an impact on whether further change will occur after publication. Key messages Public reporting is likely one of the factors affecting change in performance in long-term care facilities. Public reporting of performance measures in long-term care facilities may support improvements in particular in cases where improvement was not observed before publication.


Circulation ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 119 (23) ◽  
pp. 2978-2985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura A. Petersen ◽  
LeChauncy D. Woodard ◽  
Louise M. Henderson ◽  
Tracy H. Urech ◽  
Kenneth Pietz

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A16.3-A17
Author(s):  
D Sutcliffe ◽  
L Hobbs ◽  
G Flatt ◽  
E Shaw ◽  
T Stokes ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document