Four Schools Primarily Serving Native American Children Go From "Lowest of Low" To Meeting State Standards

2003 ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Robinson-Zañartu

As a group, Native American people are perhaps the least understood and most underserved populations in schools. Native American is a collective term, representing a large variety of cultures, language groups, customs, traditions, levels of acculturation, and levels of traditional language use. In the context of this variation, I raise and discuss a number of common patterns in their traditions and histories: world view and belief systems, acculturation stress, school-home discontinuity, learning styles, and communication patterns, which are useful reference points from which to develop more culturally compatible evaluation approaches. The ecosystems and dynamic/mediational approaches are suggested as promising.


Author(s):  
Michael E. Staub

Split-brain theorizing became the lingua franca of the 1970s and 1980s, with the left hemisphere considered the seat of rationality and language while the right hemisphere housed intuition and creativity. Expert and popular writing on cerebral asymmetry came to be directed to society’s privileged, who were encouraged to expand their right-brain potential with yoga, transcendental meditation, and biofeedback. At the same time, a substantial part of debates among neuropsychologists and related medical, social-scientific, and educational professionals revolved around the implications of such a revaluing of right-hemispheric skills specifically for African American, Latino, and Native American children. A remarkable array of experts began to affirm the existence of racial differences in intelligence while taking up a critique that “right-brained” (and often poor and minority) children were trapped in “left-brained” schools. Declaring IQ to be an inaccurate measure, psychologist Alan S. Kaufman in 1979 developed an influential alternative assessment scale specifically to expand what counted as intelligence and to include a range of creative, nonverbal, spatial, and emotional capacities—only to find that gaps in test scores between white and nonwhite children narrowed accordingly.


2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 1707-1714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna O. Shadlow ◽  
Richard E. Boles ◽  
Michael C. Roberts ◽  
Lauren Winston

1992 ◽  
Vol 101 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 33-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack L. Paradise

Antimicrobial prophylaxis for recurrent otitis media was first reported in 1960 in an uncontrolled study using a long-acting sulfonamide in Native American children younger than 11 years of age. In subsequent controlled studies using various antimicrobial drugs (primarily aminopenicillins or sulfonamides) subjects receiving prophylaxis continued to have episodes of acute otitis media, but at rates substantially lower than those of controls. More recently, prophylaxis has appeared effective in reducing the number of acute recurrences, but not the cumulative proportion of time with middle ear effusion that was present independent of such recurrences. Although questions remain about choice of drug, optimal dosage schedules, risk of untoward drug reactions, duration of use, and the risk of encouraging the emergence of resistant strains of pathogenic bacteria, antimicrobial prophylaxis currently appears to be the most logical first approach in the management of the child with recurrent otitis media.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document