Self-Monitoring Personality and Job Performance, Success, and Leadership: A Meta-Analysis

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Wilmot ◽  
John E. Barbuto
1994 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
DENIZ S. ONES ◽  
MICHAEL K. MOUNT ◽  
MURRAY R. BARRICK ◽  
JOHN E. HUNTER

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 160-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guadalupe Guzman ◽  
Taryn S. Goldberg ◽  
H. Lee Swanson

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thushel Jayaweera ◽  
Matthijs Bal ◽  
Katharina Chudzikowski ◽  
Simon de Jong

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore the macroeconomic factors that may moderate the psychological contract breach (PCB) and work outcome relationship.Design/methodology/approachThis study conducted a meta-analysis based on data from 134 studies.FindingsThe study revealed that the inflation rate and the unemployment rate of a country moderated the association among employee PCB, job performance and turnover.Research limitations/implicationsThe availability of more detailed macroeconomic data against the PCB and outcome relationship for other countries and studies examining the impact of micro-economic data for PCB and outcome relationship would provide a better understanding of the context.Practical implicationsThe authors believe that the results highlight the importance of the national economy since it impacts individual outcomes following a breach.Social implicationsEmployment policies to capture the impact of macroeconomic circumstances as discussed.Originality/valueOne of the valuable contributions made by this paper is that the authors capture the current accumulative knowledge regarding the breach and performance and breach and turnover relationship. Second, the study examines how the inflation rate and unemployment rate could moderate the association between PCB and job performance and turnover.


2008 ◽  
Vol 61 (10) ◽  
pp. 1371-1398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arie Shirom ◽  
Simona Shechter Gilboa ◽  
Yitzhak Fried ◽  
Cary L. Cooper

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Jaroslaw Grobelny

There are two main views on the role of cognitive abilities in job performance prediction. The first approach is based on meta-analysis and incremental validity analysis research and the main assumption is that general mental ability (GMA) is the best job performance predictor regardless of the occupation. The second approach, referred to as specific validity theory, assumes that job-unique weighting of different specific mental abilities (SMA) is a better predictor of job performance than GMA and occupational context cannot be ignored when job performance is predicted. The validity study of both GMA and SMA as predictors of job performance across different occupational groups (N = 4033, k = 15) was conducted. The results were analyzed by calculating observed validity coefficients and with the use of the incremental validity and the relative importance analysis. The results supports the specific validity theory – SMA proved to be a valid job performance predictor and occupational context moderated GMA validity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document