Dissociation between speech and music processing in preverbal infants

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Bortfeld ◽  
Eswen Fava ◽  
David A. Boas
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Kiley Hamlin ◽  
Tomer Ullman ◽  
Josh Tenenbaum ◽  
Noah Goodman ◽  
Chris Baker

2020 ◽  
pp. 292-314
Author(s):  
Ben Bradley

Darwin used observations of infants as evidence for his evolutionary hypotheses about human agency, in three ways. First, human actions that appear fully formed at the start of life, like sucking, were deemed reflexes or instinctive fruits of evolution. Second, infant actions show in a clear and simple form the foundations of human agency. Third, when there is no direct way of proving how complex forms of human action evolved, their growth in infancy provides a working model for natural, simple-to-complex development that is analogous to evolution. Two texts exploit these arguments: Expression (1872) and ‘A Biographical Sketch of an Infant’ (1877). The former concentrates on crying and weeping. The latter focuses on some of the distinctively human forms of agency described in Descent. A key omission in the evidence Darwin’s infant observations provide for his theory is a test of infants’ capacity for group-interaction. Evidence from such a test is critical to acceptance of Descent’s thesis that adaptations to group-life ground the most distinctive forms of human behaviour. Only recently have scientists sought this evidence. From these we know that preverbal infants do have a capacity for ‘groupness.’ Darwin’s observations of young children show a robustness and prescience borne out by contemporary research.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 191795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Schlingloff ◽  
Gergely Csibra ◽  
Denis Tatone

Hamlin et al . found in 2007 that preverbal infants displayed a preference for helpers over hinderers. The robustness of this finding and the conditions under which infant sociomoral evaluation can be elicited has since been debated. Here, we conducted a replication of the original study, in which we tested 14- to 16-month-olds using a familiarization procedure with three-dimensional animated video stimuli. Unlike previous replication attempts, ours uniquely benefited from detailed procedural advice by Hamlin. In contrast with the original results, only 16 out of 32 infants (50%) in our study reached for the helper; thus, we were not able to replicate the findings. A possible reason for this failure is that infants' preference for prosocial agents may not be reliably elicited with the procedure and stimuli adopted. Alternatively, the effect size of infants’ preference may be smaller than originally estimated. The study addresses ongoing methodological debates on the replicability of influential findings in infant cognition.


2016 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 484-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina Lüke ◽  
Angela Grimminger ◽  
Katharina J. Rohlfing ◽  
Ulf Liszkowski ◽  
Ute Ritterfeld

2016 ◽  
Vol 140 (4) ◽  
pp. 3448-3448
Author(s):  
Feng-Ming Tsao ◽  
Yu-Hsin Hu ◽  
Chieh Kao ◽  
huei-mei liu

2019 ◽  
Vol 183 ◽  
pp. 33-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina C.J.M. de Klerk ◽  
Chiara Bulgarelli ◽  
Antonia Hamilton ◽  
Victoria Southgate

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (0) ◽  
pp. 204
Author(s):  
Alan M. Slater ◽  
Dina Lew ◽  
Gavin Bremner ◽  
Peter Walker

One of the most important crossmodal associations is between vision and sound, and we know that such bimodal information is of great importance in perceptual learning. Many crossmodal relationships are non-arbitrary or ‘natural’, and a particularly important case is object naming. While many object-name relationships are arbitrary, others are not. The clearest examples are known as onomatopoeia — the cuckoo and the kittiwake are named after the sounds they make. And a striking demonstration that such effects extend beyond onomatopoeic naming of familiar objects concerns shapes. When adults are shown two shapes, one angular and one with rounded contours, and given the words ‘Takete’ and ‘Maluma’ they will invariably associate ‘Takete’ with the angular shape, and ‘Maluma’ with the rounded shape. This effect was first described by Kohler in 1947, and there have been recent demonstrations of the effect with adults and young (3-year-old) children. Several researchers have suggested that these non-arbitrary associations may be of great importance in that they may influence and ‘bootstrap’ the infant’s early language development, particularly the learning of words for objects. If this is so, such associations should be present prior to language acquisition, and we describe three experiments which demonstrate such relationships in preverbal, 3–5-month-old infants, using random shapes, such as those in the figure, and angular and rounded face-like stimuli.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document