Researchers assess breast cancer risk and the effects of tamoxifen prophylaxis among women in primary care practices

2005 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (1 suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 232-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda Sales Luiz Vianna ◽  
Juliana Giacomazzi ◽  
Cristina Brinckmann Oliveira Netto ◽  
Luciana Neves Nunes ◽  
Maira Caleffi ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 56-56
Author(s):  
Karina Bukhanov ◽  
Joel S. Ironstone ◽  
Cindy Basso ◽  
Tina Bilodeau

56 Background: Mammographic breast density is a significant risk factor for breast cancer. Women with extremely dense breasts are at 4-to-6 times the risk of developing breast cancer than women with primarily fatty breast tissue. Electrical Breast Densitometry (EBD) is a new technique that assesses breast density. EBD is non-ionizing, fast, has low cost per test ($20-$30) and may help in breast cancer risk assessment in the primary care setting. Methods: This study evaluated the feasibility of the EBD in an IRB-approved pilot study of 20 patients. The study used a custom-made self-adhesive electrode (SenoSENSE Medical Systems, Toronto, Canada) interfaced to an off-the-shelf impedance meter (Bodystat 1500, Bodystat, Isle of Man, UK) with a customized cable. On the same day as the subject’s scheduled mammogram, impedance measurements were acquired for each breast. Mammogram densities were scored by a trained radiologist using standard BiRADS breast density categories 1 to 4. Results: A high correlation coefficient was observed (Pearson correlation coefficient >0.80) between breast density determined by the EBD and the BiRADS breast density score. In addition a statistically significant difference was observed between dense categories (BiRADS 3,4) and fatty categories (BiRADS 1,2) (p<0.01), as well as between extremely dense breasts (BiRADS 4) and all other categories (p<0.01). Very high correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient >0.95) was observed between EBD measurements on the left and right breasts. Previous studies have reported a left/right correlation of 0.89 for blinded mammography readers. Conclusions: These results suggests that the EBD measure may be less variable than mammographic estimates of density. The results of the study suggest that Electrical Breast Densitometry is a promising technique for the assessment of breast density and the ability to aid in evaluation of breast cancer risk. It can be reasonably deployed at primary care facilities.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehtap Kartal ◽  
Nilgun Ozcakar ◽  
Sehnaz Hatipoglu ◽  
Makbule Neslisah Tan ◽  
Azize Dilek Guldal

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly-Anne Phillips ◽  
Emma J. Steel ◽  
Ian Collins ◽  
Jon Emery ◽  
Marie Pirotta ◽  
...  

To capitalise on advances in breast cancer prevention, all women would need to have their breast cancer risk formally assessed. With ~85% of Australians attending primary care clinics at least once a year, primary care is an opportune location for formal breast cancer risk assessment and management. This study assessed the current practice and needs of primary care clinicians regarding assessment and management of breast cancer risk. Two facilitated focus group discussions were held with 17 primary care clinicians (12 GPs and 5 practice nurses (PNs)) as part of a larger needs assessment. Primary care clinicians viewed assessment and management of cardiovascular risk as an intrinsic, expected part of their role, often triggered by practice software prompts and facilitated by use of an online tool. Conversely, assessment of breast cancer risk was not routine and was generally patient- (not clinician-) initiated, and risk management (apart from routine screening) was considered outside the primary care domain. Clinicians suggested that routine assessment and management of breast cancer risk might be achieved if it were widely endorsed as within the remit of primary care and supported by an online risk-assessment and decision aid tool that was integrated into primary care software. This study identified several key issues that would need to be addressed to facilitate the transition to routine assessment and management of breast cancer risk in primary care, based largely on the model used for cardiovascular disease.


2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. e429-e438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiraz I. Mishra ◽  
Bruce DeForge ◽  
Beth Barnet ◽  
Shana Ntiri ◽  
Laura Grant

Surgery ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 120 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara L. Smith ◽  
Michele A. Gadd ◽  
Christina Lawler ◽  
Deborah J. MacDonald ◽  
Sarah C. Grudberg ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 735-741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie O Culver ◽  
Deborah J Bowen ◽  
Susan E Reynolds ◽  
Linda E Pinsky ◽  
Nancy Press ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document