Medication errors are frequent in the emergency department and often arise from the fast pace and heavy patient load

2004 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Wretborn ◽  
Håkan Starkenberg ◽  
Thoralph Ruge ◽  
Daniel B. Wilhelms ◽  
Ulf Ekelund

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e0130020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Wretborn ◽  
Ardavan Khoshnood ◽  
Mattias Wieloch ◽  
Ulf Ekelund

2009 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. S44 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M. Rothschild ◽  
W. Churchill ◽  
A. Erickson ◽  
K. Munz ◽  
J.D. Schuur ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 558-563
Author(s):  
Akshay Kumar ◽  
Dheeneshbabu Lakshminarayanan ◽  
Nitesh Joshi ◽  
Sonali Vaid ◽  
Sanjeev Bhoi ◽  
...  

BackgroundProlonged wait times prior to triage outside the emergency department (ED) were a major problem at our institution, compromising patient safety. Patients often waited for hours outside the ED in hot weather leading to exhaustion and clinical deterioration. The aim was to decrease the median waiting time to triage from 50 min outside ED for patients to <30 min over a 4-month period.MethodsA quality improvement (QI) team was formed. Data on waiting time to triage were collected between 12 pm and 1 pm. Data were collected by hospital attendants and recorded manually. T1 was noted as a time of arrival outside the ED, and T2 was noted as the time of first medical contact. The QI team used plan–do–study–act cycles to test solutions. Change ideas to address these gaps were tested during May and June 2018. Change ideas were focused on improving the knowledge and skills of staff posted in triage and reducing turnover of triage staff. Data were analysed using run chart rules.ResultsWithin 6 weeks, the waiting time to triage reduced to <30 min (median, 12 min; IQR, 11 min) and this improvement was sustained for the next 8 weeks despite an increase in patient load.ConclusionThe authors demonstrated that people new to QI could use improvement methods to address a specific problem. It was the commitment of the frontline staff, with the active support of senior leadership in the department that helped this effort succeed.


2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 423-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca L. Beaudoin ◽  
Roland C. Merchant ◽  
Adam Janicki ◽  
Donald M. McKaig ◽  
Kavita M. Babu

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 290-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mònica Vilà-de-Muga ◽  
Laura Colom-Ferrer ◽  
Mariona Gonzàlez-Herrero ◽  
Carles Luaces-Cubells

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 753-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine Laguë ◽  
Philippe Voyer ◽  
Marie-Christine Ouellet ◽  
Valérie Boucher ◽  
Marianne Giroux ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectivesIn the fast pace of the Emergency Department (ED), clinicians are in need of tailored screening tools to detect seniors who are at risk of adverse outcomes. We aimed to explore the usefulness of the Bergman-Paris Question (BPQ) to expose potential undetected geriatric syndromes in community-living seniors presenting to the ED.MethodsThis is a planned sub-study of the INDEED multicentre prospective cohort study, including independent or semi-independent seniors (≥65 years old) admitted to hospital after an ED stay ≥8 hours and who were not delirious. Patients were assessed using validated screening tests for 3 geriatric syndromes: cognitive and functional impairment, and frailty. The BPQ was asked upon availability of a relative at enrolment. BPQ’s sensitivity and specificity analyses were used to ascertain outcomes.ResultsA response to the BPQ was available for 171 patients (47% of the main study’s cohort). Of this number, 75.4% were positive (suggesting impairment), and 24.6% were negative. To detect one of the three geriatric syndromes, the BPQ had a sensitivity of 85.4% (95% CI [76.3, 92.0]) and a specificity of 35.4% (95% CI [25.1, 46.7]). Similar results were obtained for each separate outcome. Odds ratio demonstrated a higher risk of presence of geriatric syndromes.ConclusionThe Bergman-Paris Question could be an ED screening tool for possible geriatric syndrome. A positive BPQ should prompt the need of further investigations and a negative BPQ possibly warrants no further action. More research is needed to validate the usefulness of the BPQ for day-to-day geriatric screening by ED professionals or geriatricians.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document