The Life Sciences Center at Chicago State University-A Clearinghouse of Information for All Life Science Students

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivy M. Dise Dunn
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 64
Author(s):  
Kelvin Lee

Journal of Biology and Life Science (JBLS) would like to acknowledge the following reviewers for their assistance with peer review of manuscripts for this issue. Many authors, regardless of whether JBLS publishes their work, appreciate the helpful feedback provided by the reviewers. Their comments and suggestions were of great help to the authors in improving the quality of their papers. Each of the reviewers listed below returned at least one review for this issue.Reviewers for Volume 12, Number 1Bonam Srinivasa Reddy, INSERM, FranceBratko Filipic, CIETO, SloveniaBruno Edson-Chaves, USP&UECE, BrazilChandra S Bathula, Louisiana State University, USADamir Suljevic, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and HerzegovinaMaciej Jarzębski, Poznan University of Life Sciences, PolandMeltem Sesli, Turkish Biotechnology, TurkeyNatalia Tkachuk, T.H. Shevchenko National University “Chernihiv Colehium”, UkraineRajaa Ahmed Mahmoud, University of Basrah, IraqSridhar Mandali, UCLA, USATayseer Ibrahim Alnaggar, Ain Shams University & Najran University, EgyptXiaohuang Cao, Guangdong Ocean University, ChinaYuliana, Udayana University, Indonesia Kelvin LeeEditorial AssistantJournal of Biology and Life Science-------------------------------------------Macrothink Institute5348 Vegas Dr.#825Las Vegas, Nevada 89108United StatesTel: 1-702-953-1852 ext.510Fax: 1-702-420-2900E-mail: [email protected]: http://jbls.macrothink.org


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 343
Author(s):  
Kelvin Lee

Journal of Biology and Life Science (JBLS) would like to acknowledge the following reviewers for their assistance with peer review of manuscripts for this issue. Many authors, regardless of whether JBLS publishes their work, appreciate the helpful feedback provided by the reviewers. Their comments and suggestions were of great help to the authors in improving the quality of their papers. Each of the reviewers listed below returned at least one review for this issue.Reviewers for Volume 11, Number 2 Bratko Filipic, (CIETO), SloveniaChandra S Bathula, Louisiana State University, USADamir Suljevic, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and HerzegovinaDjallel Eddine Gherissi, Souk Ahars University, AlgeriaEric Aian Silva, Federal University of Sergipe, BrazilEwa Moliszewska, Opole University, PolandGeonyzl Lepiten Alviola, Davao Doctors College, PhlippinesHomyra Tasnim, Louisiana State University, BangladeshJarod A Rollins, MDI Biological Laboratory, USAJeriels Matatula, Indonesian Silvicultural Community, IndonesiaJosé Max Barbosa de Oliveira Junior, Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará, BrazilKelechi Nkechinyere, Enugu State University of Science and Technology (ESUT), NigeriaKhyati Hitesh Shah, Stanford University, USAMaciej Jarzębski, Poznan University of Life Sciences, PolandMaria Montserrat Rivera del Alamo, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, SpainMeenakshi Agarwal, Florida Agriculture and Mechanical University, USANatalia Tkachuk, T.H. Shevchenko National University “Chernihiv Colehium”, UkraineOluwole Oladele, Federal University of Technology, NigeriaRagab A. El-Mergawi, National Research Centre, EgyptRajaa Ahmed Mahmoud, University of Basrah, IraqSridhar Mandali, UCLA, USATayseer Ibrahim Alnaggar, Ain Shams University & Najran University, EgyptValdeir Lima, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), BrazilWenlong He, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, ChinaXiaohuang Cao, Guangdong Ocean University, ChinaYuliana, Udayana University, Indonesia Kelvin LeeEditorial AssistantJournal of Biology and Life Science-------------------------------------------Macrothink Institute5348 Vegas Dr.#825Las Vegas, Nevada 89108United StatesTel: 1-702-953-1852 ext.510Fax: 1-702-420-2900E-mail: [email protected]: http://jbls.macrothink.org


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Sanders O’Leary ◽  
Hannah Whang Sayson ◽  
Casey Shapiro ◽  
Alan Garfinkel ◽  
William J. Conley ◽  
...  

Description of an innovative new math curriculum for life science students and a study examining its cognitive and noncognitive impacts, including improved academic performance in math, higher grade outcomes in subsequent science courses, and increased interest in quantitative concepts and skills relevant to 21st-century biology.


Author(s):  
Robert Speers

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 298-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph C. Watkins

The choice of pedagogy in statistics should take advantage of the quantitative capabilities and scientific background of the students. In this article, we propose a model for a statistics course that assumes student competency in calculus and a broadening knowledge in biology. We illustrate our methods and practices through examples from the curriculum.


2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (S02) ◽  
Author(s):  
T M Pepper ◽  
R L Denadel ◽  
C J Van Allen ◽  
H T Horner

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena A.E. Tibell ◽  
Carl-Johan Rundgren

Molecular life science is one of the fastest-growing fields of scientific and technical innovation, and biotechnology has profound effects on many aspects of daily life—often with deep, ethical dimensions. At the same time, the content is inherently complex, highly abstract, and deeply rooted in diverse disciplines ranging from “pure sciences,” such as math, chemistry, and physics, through “applied sciences,” such as medicine and agriculture, to subjects that are traditionally within the remit of humanities, notably philosophy and ethics. Together, these features pose diverse, important, and exciting challenges for tomorrow's teachers and educational establishments. With backgrounds in molecular life science research and secondary life science teaching, we (Tibell and Rundgren, respectively) bring different experiences, perspectives, concerns, and awareness of these issues. Taking the nature of the discipline as a starting point, we highlight important facets of molecular life science that are both characteristic of the domain and challenging for learning and education. Of these challenges, we focus most detail on content, reasoning difficulties, and communication issues. We also discuss implications for education research and teaching in the molecular life sciences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document