The role of attentional control in analogical reasoning for baboons

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy M. Flemming ◽  
Joel Fagot
2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Dougherty ◽  
Amber Sprenger ◽  
Sharona Atkins ◽  
Ana M. Franco-Watkins ◽  
Rick Thomas

2021 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. 103961
Author(s):  
José M. Salguero ◽  
Juan Ramos-Cejudo ◽  
Esperanza García-Sancho ◽  
Ilyana Arbulu ◽  
José L. Zaccagnini ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Emilia Justyna Powell

This chapter explores in considerable detail differences and similarities between the Islamic legal tradition and international law. It discusses in detail the historical interaction between these legal traditions, their co-evolution, and the academic conversations on this topic. The chapter also addresses the Islamic milieu’s contributions to international law, and sources of Islamic law including the Quran, sunna, judicial consensus, and analogical reasoning. It talks about the role of religion in international law. Mapping the specific characteristics of Islamic law and international law offers a glimpse of the contrasting and similar paradigms, spirit, and operation of law. This chapter identifies three points of convergence: law of scholars, customary law, and rule of law; as well as three points of departure: relation between law and religion, sources of law, and religious features in the courtroom (religious affiliation and gender of judges, holy oaths).


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 263178771987970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph Hamann ◽  
John Luiz ◽  
Kutlwano Ramaboa ◽  
Farzad Khan ◽  
Xolisa Dhlamini ◽  
...  

We express our unease with one-sided invitations into the Northern mainstream, as well as with Southern critics’ retreat into indigenous enclaves of organizational scholarship. We use this dichotomy to theorize the role of context in organizational theorizing by linking scholarly conversations on context, analogical reasoning, and problematizing assumptions. This creates the opportunity to more carefully consider how not just our theoretical backgrounds but also our contextual life-worlds provide the assumptions and analogies we bring into our theorizing. We use this platform to consider in more detail systematic biases in both the Northern mainstream (erasing and imposing biases) and the Southern critique (scapegoating and valorizing biases). These biases have in common that they essentialize context. To address this risk and to facilitate contextual reflexivity, we propose a form of dialogical scholarly engagement to generate complementary spaces to fruitfully question our contextually embedded assumptions.


Pain ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 152 (2) ◽  
pp. 453-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valéry Legrain ◽  
Geert Crombez ◽  
Katrien Verhoeven ◽  
André Mouraux

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 4317-4333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiong Wu ◽  
Chi-Fu Chang ◽  
Sisi Xi ◽  
I-Wen Huang ◽  
Zuxiang Liu ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve Wolverton ◽  
R. Lee Lyman

The role of analogical reasoning has been extensively discussed by American archaeologists. Geologists and evolutionary biologists suggest two kinds of analogy are necessary in historical science. The distinction between immanent and configurational properties and processes in these affinal disciplines clarifies the role of analogical reasoning in archaeology. Examples of archaeological analogies reveals conflation of the two kinds of processes and properties. Distinction between immanence and configuration provides a basis to identify the potentials and pitfalls of analogical reasoning in archaeology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document