The prediction of social physique anxiety, body image, perceived ability to dancing motivation: A basic needs theory perspective

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suh-Ruu Yeh ◽  
Chi-Yen Lin
2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 405
Author(s):  
Hidayatus Sholihah

There are two main motivation theories. a hierarchy of basic needs theory,� and an expectancy theory. In a Hyrarchy of basic needs theory, Maslow has stated that the basic needs as a main behaviour direction are structured into a hierarchy. There are five basic human needs.� The first: Physiological needs such as: salary, bonus or working condition. The second: the safety needs, such as: safe job environment, job security or health cover. The third, social needs, such as �union and team work. The next is self esteem, such as getting an award, medal, certificate or any other recognisition. Then the last is self actualization, for example is by providing an opportunity to share knowledge, skills and eprerience. The evaluation of this theory are: there is no spiritual needs as human basic needs is a main weakness of this theory. Then it is possible that different level of� needs� have to be satisfied in the same time, or not in hierarchy level or, not always have to be fulfilled in order. The next motivation theory is an Expectancy Theory. This theory is based on three main factors. The first factor is: English teachers will be motivated to work harder if they have a good perception to their own competences in accordance with their job. The second, individual motivation depends on the rewards given when they finish a� particular job. Finally, it also depends on their regards to the rewards given from the job that they do. Expectancy theory is a good theory, however, it is not easy to be implemented because the principals should provide various types of reward to satisfy the expectation of their English teachers. Considering the strengths and weaknesses of these two theories, it is better to combine both of them in the practice to get more effective results.


Author(s):  
De Wet Schutte

Abstract Community development lacks a proper theory. This paper postulates that the reason for this intolerable state being that community development has been hijacked by charity organizations and politicians with ‘do good’ intentions, simply because it lacks proper scientific theory that offers some element of prediction in the outcome. Current development approaches are revisited and the basic needs theory proposed as a useful theory that takes community development beyond just various ‘approaches’. It merges the complexities of the community development concept into a distinct scientifically based theory that includes an assessment technique (Priority Index), which makes it possible to identify and prioritize the basic or ‘true’ needs in a community. The theory equates addressing the basic community needs with the ‘art of timing’, which means doing the right thing at the right time is the only real solution to trigger the upward development spiral. In doing so, the basic needs theory postulates that once the identified basic needs in the target community are brought within their locus of control, the upward development spiral is triggered and a predictably new set of ‘higher level’ needs will emerge. This process is essential to the change principle inherent to the community development process.


1973 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 210-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary M. Erickson

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleanor Quested ◽  
Nikos Ntoumanis ◽  
Carme Viladrich ◽  
Ellen Haug ◽  
Yngvar Ommundsen ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 586-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleanor Quested ◽  
Joan L. Duda ◽  
Nikos Ntoumanis ◽  
Jonathan P. Maxwell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document