Relationships, Gender Relations, and Hope in Women in STEM Majors

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rhea Owens ◽  
Karen D. Multon ◽  
Barbara A. Kerr
Sex Roles ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 75 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 110-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan M. Barth ◽  
Sarah Dunlap ◽  
Kelsey Chappetta

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Sliko ◽  
◽  
Aldo Morales ◽  
Sedig Agili ◽  
Reuben Asempapa
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 571-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikki A. Falk ◽  
Patrick J. Rottinghaus ◽  
Tracy N. Casanova ◽  
Fred H. Borgen ◽  
Nancy E. Betz

Despite social cognitive and cultural barriers, women continue to consider and declare science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) majors. Research suggests that both self-efficacy and interest are necessary to approach a career goal; however, women in STEM report lower interest and confidence compared to their male counterparts. Using integrative career profiles of 448 potential and declared STEM majors, we investigated Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, and Conventional thresholds of self-efficacy and interest among women and men using the career and personality assessments integrative online system. Results indicated gender as a moderator for the Realistic threshold, where women have a lower threshold for approaching and declaring a STEM major compared with men. Women in this sample showed similar levels of Investigative self-efficacy and interests compared with men. This study adds to prior literature investigating people–thing orientations among men and women in STEM. These results may be utilized in broadening female participation in STEM and alleviating underrepresentation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 488-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isis H. Settles ◽  
Rachel C. O’Connor ◽  
Stevie C. Y. Yap

In a study of 639 female undergraduates in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors, we found that the relation between a negative academic climate and more interference between identities as women and as scientists, and lower science performance perceptions, was mediated by lower psychological well-being. We also found partial support for gender identity (centrality, private regard, and public regard) as a buffer of the link between climate/interference and psychological well-being. Specifically, gender centrality buffered the link between identity interference and well-being. Gender public regard buffered the association of both negative climate and interference with well-being, and gender private regard exacerbated the link between interference and well-being. We discuss these results in terms of the benefits that gender identification may provide for women in STEM and suggest that educators create networks for women in STEM, while working to reduce sexism and improve academic climates. Online slides for instructors who want to use this article for teaching are available on PWQ 's website at http://pwq.sagepub.com/supplemental


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document