Effects of Administration Directions and Student Attributions on Student Ratings

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven R. Winniger ◽  
Andrew J. Caudill
Keyword(s):  
2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 176-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Furnham ◽  
Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic

Abstract. This study examines the relationship between students' personality and intelligence scores with their preferences for the personality profile of their lecturers. Student ratings (N = 136) of 30 lecturer trait characteristics were coded into an internally reliable Big Five taxonomy ( Costa & McCrae, 1992 ). Descriptive statistics showed that, overall, students tended to prefer conscientious, open, and stable lecturers, though correlations revealed that these preferences were largely a function of students' own personality traits. Thus, open students preferred open lecturers, while agreeable students preferred agreeable lecturers. There was evidence of a similarity effect for both Agreeableness and Openness. In addition, less intelligent students were more likely to prefer agreeable lecturers than their more intelligent counterparts were. A series of regressions showed that individual differences are particularly good predictors of preferences for agreeable lecturers, and modest, albeit significant, predictors of preferences for open and neurotic lecturers. Educational and vocational implications are considered.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana M. Doumas ◽  
Christine L. Pearson ◽  
Jenna E. Elgin

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cade Hulbert ◽  
Kristin Batten ◽  
Jessica Kesler ◽  
Carly Gintz ◽  
Jeffrey R. Stowell ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 419-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter M. Nelson ◽  
Theodore J. Christ

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thamar Voss ◽  
Mareike Kunter ◽  
Jurgen Baumert

TACD Journal ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-44
Author(s):  
Betty C. M. Milburn

1978 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 483-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaac I. Bejar ◽  
Kenneth O. Doyle

Multivariate analysis of variance revealed a significant relationship between student ratings and curriculum area but not between ratings and course format. The technical and practical ramifications of these findings are discussed.


1988 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn M. Rickard ◽  
Robert W. Titley

This article describes an interviewing game used in a graduate-level interviewing skills course. The goal of the game is to teach basic components of the interviewing process such as comfort with the interview, microcounseling skills, hypothesis generation, and hypothesis testing. The instructor plays the part of a client and is interviewed by two teams of students. Roles of students in the game and game procedure are explained. Favorable student ratings and positive feedback have been received.


AAUP Bulletin ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilbert J. Mckeachie

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document