Mechanisms of Selective Information Exposure

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron M. Scherer ◽  
Paul D. Windschitl ◽  
Andrew R. Smith
2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Scherer ◽  
P. D. Windschitl ◽  
A. R. Smith ◽  
J. P. Rose

Desalination ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 199 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 521-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adinela Cazacu ◽  
Mathieu Michau ◽  
Carole Arnal-Herault ◽  
Anca Meffre ◽  
Remi Caraballo ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Kelly Garrett ◽  
Shira Dvir Gvirsman ◽  
Benjamin K. Johnson ◽  
Yariv Tsfati ◽  
Rachel Neo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 283 (1826) ◽  
pp. 20152954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristian Pasquaretta ◽  
Marine Battesti ◽  
Elizabeth Klenschi ◽  
Christophe A. H. Bousquet ◽  
Cedric Sueur ◽  
...  

Animals use a number of different mechanisms to acquire crucial information. During social encounters, animals can pass information from one to another but, ideally, they would only use information that benefits survival and reproduction. Therefore, individuals need to be able to determine the value of the information they receive. One cue can come from the behaviour of other individuals that are already using the information. Using a previous extended dataset, we studied how individual decision-making is influenced by the behaviour of conspecifics in Drosophila melanogaster . We analysed how uninformed flies acquire and later use information about oviposition site choice they learn from informed flies. Our results suggest that uninformed flies adjust their future choices based on how coordinated the behaviours of the informed individuals they encounter are. Following social interaction, uninformed flies tended either to collectively follow the choice of the informed flies or to avoid it. Using social network analysis, we show that this selective information use seems to be based on the level of homogeneity of the social network. In particular, we found that the variance of individual centrality parameters among informed flies was lower in the case of a ‘follow’ outcome compared with the case of an ‘avoid’ outcome.


Author(s):  
Lu Wei ◽  
Tien-Tsung Lee

Trust is a central construct of social research. While numerous studies have investigated trust as either a dependent or independent variable, little attention has been paid to its relationship with health-related behaviors in the context of a public health crisis. How trust in different entities influences people’s social distancing intention is therefore an important question that merits academic scrutiny. Moreover, the relationship between trust and social distancing intention cannot be well understood without an account of the information environment. As previous studies have reached a consensus about the limited effects of information exposure on individual outcomes, this research focuses on possible moderating effects. Results show that information exposure, no matter via interpersonal or media sources, has no direct effects on behavioral intention. Rather, risk communication serves as a moderator of the relationship between trust and social distancing intention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document