Supplemental Material for The Reference Group Identity Dependence Scale-Adults: Creation of a Short Form, Validity Assessment, and Measurement Invariance by Race/Ethnicity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald F. Levant ◽  
Daniel K. McKelvey ◽  
Alexis DaFonseca ◽  
Ryon C. McDermott

1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 384-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay C. Wade ◽  
Charles J. Gelso

The purpose of this study was to develop a measure of male identity based on Wade's (1998) theory of male reference group identity dependence. The construct was operationalized in the form of a self-report instrument, the Reference Group Identity Dependence Scale (RGIDS), that assesses feelings of psychological relatedness to other males. A total of 344 undergraduate males from a large state university completed the RGIDS. Construct validity was evaluated by relating the RGIDS to measures of ego identity, gender role conflict, social anxiety, self-esteem, and anxiety and depression symptomatology. Results of the factor analysis indicated that a four-factor structure corresponded to three hypothesized levels of the construct. The four subscales of the RGIDS demonstrated sound internal consistency, and correlations found between the RGIDS and the other measures in the study indicated preliminary support for validity of the construct. The findings are discussed in terms of implications for the theory and future research on men and masculinity.


1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay C. Wade ◽  
Charles J. Gelso

2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 708-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald F. Levant ◽  
Kathleen M. Alto ◽  
Daniel K. McKelvey ◽  
Katherine A. Richmond ◽  
Ryon C. McDermott

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-189
Author(s):  
Ronald F. Levant ◽  
Kathleen M. Alto ◽  
Daniel McKelvey ◽  
Seth Pardo ◽  
Stefan Jadaszewski ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Y. T. Fong ◽  
Janet Y. H. Wong ◽  
Edmond P. H. Choi ◽  
K. F. Lam ◽  
C. Kwok

Abstract Background The Short Form 12-item Health Survey (SF-12v2) was originally developed in English, but it is also available in Hong Kong (HK) Chinese. While both language versions had their measurement properties well assessed in their respective populations, their measurement invariance in scores has not been examined. Therefore, we aimed to assess their measurement invariance. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study on individuals aged 18 years or older at a university campus. Those who were bilingual in English and Chinese were randomly assigned to self-complete either the standard English or the HK Chinese SF-12v2. Measurement invariance of the two components and eight scales of the SF-12v2 was concluded if the corresponding 90% confidence interval (CI) for the difference between the two language versions entirely fell within the minimal clinically important difference of ± 3 units. Multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was also performed. Results A total of 1013 participants completed the SF-12v2 (496 in English and 517 in HK Chinese), with a mean age of 22 years (Range 18–58), and 626 participants (62%) were female. There were no significant differences in demographics. Only the physical and mental components and the mental health (MH) scale had their 90% CIs (0.21 to 1.61, − 1.00 to 0.98, and − 0.86 to 2.84, respectively) completely fall within the ± 3 units. The multiple-group CFA showed partial strict invariance. Conclusions The English and HK Chinese versions of the SF-12v2 can be used in studies with their two components and MH scores pooled in the analysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document