Improving everyday memory performance after acquired brain injury: An RCT on recollection and working memory training.

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 586-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Merle Richter ◽  
Claudia Mödden ◽  
Paul Eling ◽  
Helmut Hildebrandt
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Assecondi ◽  
Rong Hu ◽  
Gail Eskes ◽  
Michelle Read ◽  
Chris Griffiths ◽  
...  

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors flagged that the article had published with the Acknowledgements erroneously excluded from the declarations at the end of the article.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Assecondi ◽  
Rong Hu ◽  
Gail Eskes ◽  
Michelle Read ◽  
Chris Griffiths ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) admissions have an incidence of 385 per 100,000 of the population in the UK, and as brain injury often involves the frontal networks, cognitive domains affected are likely to be executive control, working memory, and problem-solving deficits, resulting in difficulty with everyday activities. The above observations make working memory, and related constructs such as attention and executive functioning attractive targets for neurorehabilitation. We propose a combined home-based rehabilitation protocol involving the concurrent administration of a working memory training program (adaptive N-back task) with non-invasive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex to promote long-lasting modification of brain areas underlying working memory function. Method Patients with a working memory deficit will be recruited and assigned to two age-matched groups receiving working memory training for 2 weeks: an active group, receiving tDCS (2 mA for 20 min), and a control group, receiving sham stimulation. After the end of the first 2 weeks, both groups will continue the working memory training for three more weeks. Outcome measures will be recorded at timepoints throughout the intervention, including baseline, after the 2 weeks of stimulation, at the end of the working memory training regimen and 1 month after the completion of the training. Discussion The aim of the study is to assess if non-invasive tDCS stimulation has an impact on performance and benefits of a working memory training regimen. Specifically, we will examine the impact of brain stimulation on training gains, if changes in gains would last, and whether changes in training performance transfer to other cognitive domains. Furthermore, we will explore whether training improvements impact on everyday life activities and how the home-based training regimen is received by participants, with the view to develop an effective home healthcare tool that could enhance working memory and daily functioning. Trial registration This study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04010149 on July 8, 2019.


2016 ◽  
Vol 97 (10) ◽  
pp. e140
Author(s):  
Xiaoping Yun ◽  
Zhengwei Chen ◽  
Pu Zhang ◽  
Huili Zhang ◽  
Huazhen Zhang

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (8) ◽  
pp. 1168-1182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura E. Matzen ◽  
Michael C. Trumbo ◽  
Michael J. Haass ◽  
Michael A. Hunter ◽  
Austin Silva ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 907-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonna Nilsson ◽  
Alexander V. Lebedev ◽  
Anders Rydström ◽  
Martin Lövdén

The promise of transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) as a modulator of cognition has appealed to researchers, media, and the general public. Researchers have suggested that tDCS may increase effects of cognitive training. In this study of 123 older adults, we examined the interactive effects of 20 sessions of anodal tDCS over the left prefrontal cortex (vs. sham tDCS) and simultaneous working memory training (vs. control training) on change in cognitive abilities. Stimulation did not modulate gains from pre- to posttest on latent factors of either trained or untrained tasks in a statistically significant manner. A supporting meta-analysis ( n = 266), including younger as well as older individuals, showed that, when combined with training, tDCS was not much more effective than sham tDCS at changing working memory performance ( g = 0.07, 95% confidence interval, or CI = [−0.21, 0.34]) and global cognition performance ( g = −0.01, 95% CI = [−0.29, 0.26]) assessed in the absence of stimulation. These results question the general usefulness of current tDCS protocols for enhancing the effects of cognitive training on cognitive ability.


Brain Injury ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (13-14) ◽  
pp. 1658-1665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Björkdahl ◽  
Elisabeth Åkerlund ◽  
Siv Svensson ◽  
Eva Esbjörnsson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document