Hemispheric specialization for processing soccer related pictures: The role of supporter fanaticism.

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 329-341
Author(s):  
Erick Francisco Quintas Conde ◽  
Adriana Oliveira de Santana Lucena ◽  
Rosenir Maria da Silva ◽  
Alberto Filgueiras ◽  
Allan Pablo Lameira ◽  
...  
Brain Injury ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (13-14) ◽  
pp. 1617-1629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanisha G. Hill-Jarrett ◽  
Jason T. Gravano ◽  
Christopher N. Sozda ◽  
William M. Perlstein

1982 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 655-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Brizzolara ◽  
Gianni L. De Nobili ◽  
Giovanni Ferretti

The role of the right hemisphere in a task of haptic discrimination of line orientation was studied in 16 children aged 7–6 and 16 adults aged 25 yr. The exploratory movements were limited to hand and wrist, since it has been shown that distal movements are mediated by the contralateral hemisphere. A comparison of the performance of the two hands shows a clear superiority of the left hand and inferred right hemisphere in both children and adults. An especial emphasis in the discussion is given to the role of the experimental procedure in enhancing the effect of the hemispheric functional asymmetries.


2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rochele Paz Fonseca ◽  
Lilian Cristine Scherer ◽  
Camila Rosa de Oliveira ◽  
Maria Alice de Mattos Pimenta Parente

Doctor Ru ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 23-28
Author(s):  
E.A. Narodova ◽  
◽  
N.A. Schnaider ◽  
V.V. Narodova ◽  
E.E. Erakhtin ◽  
...  

Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1602
Author(s):  
Christian Mancini ◽  
Giovanni Mirabella

The relationship between handedness, laterality, and inhibitory control is a valuable benchmark for testing the hypothesis of the right-hemispheric specialization of inhibition. According to this theory, and given that to stop a limb movement, it is sufficient to alter the activity of the contralateral hemisphere, then suppressing a left arm movement should be faster than suppressing a right-arm movement. This is because, in the latter case, inhibitory commands produced in the right hemisphere should be sent to the other hemisphere. Further, as lateralization of cognitive functions in left-handers is less pronounced than in right-handers, in the former, the inhibitory control should rely on both hemispheres. We tested these predictions on a medium-large sample of left- and right-handers (n = 52). Each participant completed two sessions of the reaching versions of the stop-signal task, one using the right arm and one using the left arm. We found that reactive and proactive inhibition do not differ according to handedness. However, we found a significant advantage of the right versus the left arm in canceling movements outright. By contrast, there were no differences in proactive inhibition. As we also found that participants performed movements faster with the right than with the left arm, we interpret our results in light of the dominant role of the left hemisphere in some aspects of motor control.


Author(s):  
Lise Van der Haegen ◽  
Qing Cai

It is intriguing that the two brain halves of the human brain look so similar, but are in fact quite different at the anatomical level, and even more so at the functional level. In particular, the highly frequent co-occurrence of right-handedness and left hemisphere dominance of language has led to an abundance of laterality research. This chapter discusses the most important recent finding on laterality (i.e., left or right hemisphere) and degree of hemispheric specialization for speech production, auditory speech processing, and reading. Following a descriptive overview of these three core sub-processes of language, the chapter summarizes possible influences on the lateralization of each, including anatomical, evolutionary, genetic, developmental, and experiential factors, as well as handedness and impairment. It will become clear that language is a heterogeneous cognitive function driven by a variety of underpinning origins. Next, the often-underestimated role of the right hemisphere for language is discussed with respect to prosody and metaphor comprehension, as well as individual differences in the lateralization of healthy and language-impaired brains. Finally, recent insights into the relationship between lateralized language and non-language functions are discussed, highlighting the unique contribution of lateralization research to the growing knowledge of general human brain mechanisms.


2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rochele Paz Fonseca ◽  
Lilian Cristine Scherer ◽  
Camila Rosa de Oliveira ◽  
Maria Alice de Mattos Pimenta Parente

2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 414-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Behne ◽  
Henning Scheich ◽  
André Brechmann

Animal and human studies suggest that directional categorization of frequency-modulated (FM) tones (rising vs. falling) is a function of the right auditory cortex (AC). To investigate this hemispheric specialization in more detail, we analyzed both the binaural and monaural representation of FM tones and the influence of contralateral white noise on the processing of FM tone direction. In two fMRI-experiments, FM tones with varied direction, center-frequencies, and duration were presented binaurally or monaurally without contralateral white noise (experiment 1) and with contralateral white noise (experiment 2) while the subjects had to perform the same directional categorization task. In experiment 1, contralateral FM tones led to strongest activation, binaural FM tones to intermediate, and ipsilateral FM tones to weakest activation in each AC. This is in accordance with binaural response properties of neurons in animal AC. In experiment 2, contralateral white noise had no significant effect on the activation of left AC by FM tones, whereas in right AC, it led to a significant increase in activation for ipsilateral FM tones. This result provides further support for the critical role of right AC for directional categorization of FM tones, which for ipsilateral input has to be processed in competition to the excitatory input of white noise via the direct contralateral pathway.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document