Experiences of older transgender and gender nonconforming adults in psychotherapy: A qualitative study.

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Beth Elder
2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 478-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
An Pham ◽  
Anthony R. Morgan ◽  
Hannah Kerman ◽  
Katie Albertson ◽  
Julia M. Crouch ◽  
...  

Sexologies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. e61-e71 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Scandurra ◽  
R. Vitelli ◽  
N.M. Maldonato ◽  
P. Valerio ◽  
V. Bochicchio

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Pelts ◽  
David L. Albright ◽  
Justin T. McDaniel ◽  
Sandra Laski ◽  
Kelli Godfrey

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Billies

The work of the Welfare Warriors Research Collaborative (WWRC), a participatory action research (PAR) project that looks at how low income lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and gender nonconforming (LG-BTGNC) people survive and resist violence and discrimination in New York City, raises the question of what it means to make conscientization, or critical consciousness, a core feature of PAR. Guishard's (2009) reconceptualization of conscientization as “moments of consciousness” provides a new way of looking at what seemed to be missing from WWRC's process and analysis. According to Guishard, rather than a singular awakening, critical consciousness emerges continually through interactions with others and the social context. Analysis of the WWRC's process demonstrates that PAR researchers doing “PAR deep” (Fine, 2008)—research in which community members share in all aspects of design, method, analysis and product development—should have an agenda for developing critical consciousness, just as they would have agendas for participation, for action, and for research.


Author(s):  
Joseph Plaster

In recent years there has been a strong “public turn” within universities that is renewing interest in collaborative approaches to knowledge creation. This article draws on performance studies literature to explore the cross-disciplinary collaborations made possible when the academy broadens our scope of inquiry to include knowledge produced through performance. It takes as a case study the “Peabody Ballroom Experience,” an ongoing collaboration between the Johns Hopkins University Sheridan Libraries, the Peabody Institute BFA Dance program, and Baltimore’s ballroom community—a performance-based arts culture comprising gay, lesbian, queer, transgender, and gender-nonconforming people of color.


Author(s):  
Heather L. Armstrong

Sexual disorders and dysfunction are common among people of all sexual orientations and gender identities. And while definitions and conceptions of sexual health are typically broad, the clinical and research perspectives on sexual function and dysfunction have traditionally relied on the four-phase model of sexual response and disorders are generally classified as “male” or “female.” This chapter reviews the diagnostic criteria for specific sexual dysfunctions and presents a summary of existing research among sexual and gender minority populations. Overall, research on sexual dysfunction among sexual and gender minority people is limited, and this is especially true for transgender and gender nonconforming individuals. Understanding these often complex disorders requires that individuals, clinicians, and researchers consider a range of biopsychosocial factors that can affect and be affected by one’s sexual health and sexuality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document